Video summary
The Best Stocks & Shares ISA in 2026 (BIG CHANGES)
Main summary
Key takeaways
Finance-focused summary (Stocks & Shares ISA broker comparison for 2026 “BIG CHANGES”)
Key idea / selection criteria
The speaker argues that UK Stocks & Shares ISA platforms differ meaningfully in:
- Fees (platform/dealing costs and trading costs)
- FX costs (buying non-GBP assets)
- Product range (e.g., ETFs vs mutual funds)
- Fractional share availability
- Execution model (and the behavioral risk it creates)
So, the “best ISA” depends on the investor’s style and priorities.
Brokers mentioned + what they’re “best for” (and why)
1) Lightyear
New offer (as of 11 March, “a month old”)
- FX fee reduced: 0.35% → 0.1%
- No account fees or trading fees (FX is presented as the main cost)
- Cash deposit fees:
- Apple Pay/card deposits incur a fee
- Bank transfer avoids it
Fractional shares
- Fractional buying is now available for “most ETFs” (index-style investing)
- Many US companies available fractionally (leveraging low FX)
- Limitation: fractional shares not broadly available for GB pound-listed companies yet (expected but not confirmed)
- Mentions ~6,000 investments available (about half of Trading 212’s range)
Sustainability / risk (company financials & caution)
- Shows a latest accounts loss of ~£10m
- Supported by ~$58m fundraising, including Richard Branson
- Claims they’re “unit profitable” but UK business not yet profitable; using VC funding to reach full profitability
- Speaker wants proof the pricing lasts:
- If it continues and expands ETF/share range in ~12 months, it could become #1
Disclosures/risks
- Capital is at risk with promotions
Use case in speaker’s portfolio
- Used for ISA
- Specifically for spare funds in a limited company
- Speaker uses five brokerage accounts to help avoid exceeding FSCS limits
Promo detail (affiliate)
- New customers using link/promo code “Damian”:
- £100 deposit → free fractional shares up to £100
- Promo credited to a general investment account, not an ISA
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- None directly (discussion is mostly at ETF/US-share category level)
2) Freetrade
Core positioning
- Stocks & Shares ISA becomes “free” on the basic plan
- Paid tiers are described as poor in the speaker’s calculations
FX fee (important cost)
- 0.99% (highest in the comparison)
- Example:
- Investing £1,200 into a foreign-listed investment → £12 FX cost
- Also applies when selling
Where it’s strong
- Mutual funds + legacy overlap
- Supports mutual funds listed in pounds
- Example mutual fund family: Vanguard LifeStrategy funds
- Speaker’s framing: mutual fund cost advantages vs buying directly elsewhere, because some platforms charge %/uncapped annual fees
Also offers gilts
- UK government bonds (not common among low-fee modern platforms)
SIP wrapper note
- SIP is also on the free basic plan (ISA wrapper info)
Use case in speaker’s view
- Best for buyers who want mutual funds + low platform fees, despite higher FX
Promo detail (affiliate)
- Using affiliate link:
- Deposit at least £50 → free share up to £100
- Capital at risk
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- Vanguard LifeStrategy (fund range)
- Gilts / UK government bonds
3) Trading 212
Core fee structure
- “Effectively free” for the speaker’s style
- FX fee: 0.15% on non-pound purchases
- Deposit-by-card/Apple Pay fee can be avoided with bank transfer
Product/tools
- Pie feature
- Build/copy portfolios
- Copy from users or professional portfolio managers
- Fractional shares
- Described as the widest range across ETFs and individual companies
- Start investing with as little as £1
Important caution / risk note: CFDs
- Trading 212 is profitable partly via CFDs
- CFDs are described as highly speculative (“most people lose money”)
- The app may promote CFDs inside ISA search flows
- You may see CFD results, but you can’t buy them inside an ISA without extra steps (disclaimers/suitability questionnaires)
- Speaker recommends awareness to avoid accidental exposure
Use case
- Speaker’s main broker
- Has used it for ~6 years
Promo detail (affiliate)
- Fractional share up to £100 via link/code “Damian”
- Deposit £1
- Code valid up to 10 days after signup
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- None directly; emphasis on ETFs & funds
4) Prosper
Targeted “lowest fees” strategy (specific use case)
- Entry around 2023
- ~200 funds offered, but 30 ETFs have fund provider fee refunds
Fee structure
- No account fees
- No trading fees
- For the 30 ETF list:
- They refund the built-in ongoing charge (fund fee)
- Example exposures mentioned within the 30:
- S&P 500
- UK market and bond funds
- Speaker clarifies these are examples of categories, not the exact holdings they personally invest in
Company financial caution
- Shows ~£2.5m loss in 2025, up from ~£1.9m the prior year
- Seeking revenue via savings and financial guidance products
- Speaker warns the “current offer” may not last forever
Use case
- Consider only if you find the investment you want on Prosper’s 30 ETF fee-refund list
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- S&P 500
- UK market and bond funds (category)
5) InvestEngine
ETF-only ISA
- No individual shares—ETF-only
Fees
- No platform/dealing/FX fees because ETFs are “listed in pounds”
Scale
- 849 funds (at recording time)
Execution trade-off (process / risk control)
- Slow execution
- Batches orders
- May take days to show/withdraw
- Speaker’s view: this prevents emotional trading (“distraction-free, set and forget”)
Recent reductions (potential downside)
- Removed exchange-traded commodities
- Removed pre-built portfolios
- Removed low-cost managed ISA service
Use case
- Speaker uses it for business investing via a limited company; they apply the same method for the ISA
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- Mentions exchange-traded commodities (asset class), no specific tickers
6) IBKR (Interactive Brokers)
Positioning
- Best for frequent/serious trading and advanced execution
FX fee
- Described as lower than Lightyear’s 0.1% (speaker’s claim)
Costs and drawbacks
- Has trading fees and minimum account activity fees
- Speaker concludes it’s usually more expensive overall unless you place trades of a few thousand pounds or more frequently
Pros
- Advanced trading functionality and execution
- Speaker’s view: confidence that fee/offers won’t change quickly
Cons
- Complexity—fee tables and tools can be overwhelming
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- None
7) Hargreaves Lansdown (HL)
Not recommended for standard Stocks & Shares ISA
- Speaker criticizes HL mainly on cost.
Junior ISA
- Junior Stocks & Shares ISA is described as free and best in their ranking
Critiques
- Fees updated in a way that increased costs for many investors
- UI described as outdated (“Teletext” look)
Use case
- Onboarding children early (speaker notes HL “trying to lock in the next generation”)
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- None
8) Interactive Investor
Positioning
- More traditional broker:
- Phone support
- Managed investment options
- Range of stocks and funds
Fee trade-off
- Fixed-fee platform is uncompetitive for small investors
- More competitive for larger portfolios than HL/AJ Bell/Fidelity (speaker’s comparison)
Use case
- People who value human support and have larger balances that justify fixed fees
Tickers/assets explicitly referenced
- None
Framework / step-by-step investment methodology (broker selection)
No formal valuation/technical framework was provided. The “framework” is a decision process driven by behavior and costs:
- Compare FX fees (especially for non-GBP assets)
- Compare platform/dealing fees (account and transaction costs)
- Check fractional share availability
- ETFs-only vs ETFs + individual stocks
- Choose by product type
- ETFs-only vs mutual funds support
- Whether you need gilts
- Consider execution model / behavioral risk
- Faster execution vs batching/scheduled execution to reduce emotional trading
- Be alert to CFD promotion pitfalls (Trading 212)
- Watch ISA eligibility boundaries (especially around CFDs)
- Evaluate broker sustainability
- Look at recent company losses and fundraising/support
- Consider whether fee promotions look temporary
- Use multiple accounts to manage FSCS concentration risk
- Speaker spreads across platforms
Key numbers, timelines, and explicit recommendations
Key numbers / timelines mentioned
- Lightyear FX: 0.1%
- New on 11 March
- Speaker wants 12 months of proof
- Lightyear company loss: ~£10m (latest accounts)
- Lightyear fundraising: ~$58m (incl. Richard Branson)
- Freetrade FX: 0.99%
- Example FX cost: £1,200 foreign investment → £12 FX cost (also on sell)
- Trading 212 FX: 0.15%
- Trading 212 tenure: ~6 years
- Prosper:
- Fee-refund ETFs: 30
- Total funds: ~200
- Losses: ~£2.5m (2025) vs ~£1.9m prior year
- InvestEngine funds: 849
- Execution delays: orders/withdrawals can take days
- Cash interest mentioned:
- Trading 212 and Lightyear referenced as paying competitive interest
- Freetrade cash interest at 1% (speaker says “significantly lower”)
Speaker’s final “who they will use” recommendations
- Trading 212: main broker (fee-free for preferred approach; described as sustainable)
- Lightyear: best new option
- Use inside limited company
- Test offering over the next year
- Potential top pick if pricing/range persists
- Freetrade: best for mutual funds
- InvestEngine: passive, “set and forget” distraction-free approach
- Prosper: only if holdings exist on Prosper’s 30 ETF fee-refund list
- IBKR: professionals/frequent traders
- Hargreaves Lansdown (HL): kids junior ISA (free) and “next generation” framing
- Interactive Investor: phone support + managed options for larger balances
Disclosures / disclaimers noted
- Broker links are affiliate links:
- Using them pays the creator/viewer no extra cost; “doesn’t affect opinion.”
- Brokers mentioned are regulated/authorized by the FCA and covered by FSCS.
- Must follow CAST rules (client assets segregated from firm assets).
- Promotions: capital is at risk if you invest.
- CFDs note:
- CFDs are speculative
- Trading 212 may surface CFD results in ISA search flows
- Buying CFDs inside an ISA may require extra steps (disclaimers/suitability)
Presenters / sources
- Presenter: “Damian” (named via promo code/affiliate branding: Damian)
- Company backing source referenced: Richard Branson
- Regulatory sources referenced: FCA, FSCS, CAST rules