Samsung S26 Ultra VS Z Fold 8 ¿Que DEBO elegir?

Product(s) discussed

• Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 8 (foldable)
• Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (conventional candybar phone) (Used as the main comparison throughout.)

---

Key points / features mentioned about Galaxy Z Fold 8

Design & usability (folding experience)

• Feels “different” for the first 2–3 days; not immediately as comfortable as the S26 Ultra.
• The outer screen can feel “too short” to the speaker at times, though it’s still comfortable for many tasks.
• When opened, it provides a larger screen experience for:
  • enjoying content
  • multitasking
• Flexibility benefit: a major justification for foldables is that when closed, you use your phone less—while still getting “mini-tablet” benefits when opened.
• Screen size claim: internal display is 7.6 inches, described as plenty for videos, games, and movies.

Software & app layout issues (pros/cons)

• The Fold 8 is described as a major step—“closest thing” to a phone + tablet in one device (best concept among the Samsung foldables mentioned).
• Still has UI/behavior inconsistencies, such as:
  • Instagram/games/YouTube adapting awkwardly between outer vs. inner screen
  • persistent “errors” and operating system problems the speaker doesn’t fully understand

Multitasking

• Can handle using 3–4 apps at once (the speaker says this is not possible on the S26 Ultra mainly due to screen size).

Camera experience (major con)

• Cameras are “more than enough” for 95% of people, but the speaker is tech-focused and wants top-tier camera performance.
• Compared to the Oppo Find N6, Fold 8 cameras lack the “wow effect.”
• Compared to S26 Ultra:
  • S26 Ultra cameras are described as more impressive, nicer, more professional
  • the speaker feels more eager to shoot with the S26 Ultra than with the Fold 8
• For trips/family pets, the speaker would sometimes shoot on the Fold, but doesn’t feel the Fold’s camera is “spectacular.”

Durability / trade-offs

Typical foldable concerns are highlighted:

• Risk of hinge issues over time
• Only IP48 protection, so concerns include dust/sand (beach/pool) and possible ingress
• Fear of repair costs, including an example of ~€500 screen repair due to wear/tear rather than impact
• Worries about screen cracking over time from normal wear (e.g., fingernails)

Battery & thermals (major pro)

• First Samsung foldable where battery is described as not a concern
• Can leave Saturday and return Sunday without worry, except heavy GPS use
• Claims it doesn’t get hot (the S26 Ultra also doesn’t, but the Fold handles battery/heat well)
• Charging:
  • Charging is slower than S26 Ultra
  • Reaches over 60% in ~30 minutes (closer to 70%)
  • Supports wireless charging and reverse charging
  • Mentions Maxsafe compatibility (with the appropriate case/accessories)

Charging / OS / update support

• Launches with Android 17 + One UI 9
• One UI 9 for S26 Ultra expected around September (the speaker corrects earlier leak timing)
• Updates:
  • Fold 8: 7 years
  • S26 Ultra: 6 more years
• The speaker believes the Fold could be replaced sooner in practice due to foldable wear/concerns (hinge, screen, dust), even if the official update duration is longer.

Notable missing features

• Samsung removed Flex Mode this year; some half-open video usage features aren’t usable as before.
• No S Pen included (speaker is strongly critical):
  • S Pen is exclusive to Ultra models
  • speaker doesn’t understand why Samsung doesn’t include one even with a fragile-screen design

Sound mention

• A comparison about sound at maximum volume between Fold 8 and S26 Ultra is referenced, but the actual result/details are not included beyond the setup.

---

Key points / features mentioned about Galaxy S26 Ultra (comparison highlights)

• Traditional “pick up and use” comfort: no folding learning curve.
• Larger mainstream advantages from long-term habit:
  • after 10–15 years using conventional phones, familiarity becomes a strong factor
• Screen benefits vs Fold:
  • Fold screens aren’t described as having the Ultra’s anti-glare characteristics
• Camera superiority (speaker’s view):
  • “professional” results and more motivation to shoot
• Durability perception:
  • fewer concerns about hinges, dust ingress, and crease wear
• Updates:
  • 6 more years (vs Fold’s 7)

---

Pros mentioned for Fold 8

• Strong overall foldable concept; best “phone+tablet” experience among Samsung foldables (speaker’s view)
• Much improved internal screen crease visibility (new tech; “practically don’t notice” most of the time)
• Great battery life and low heat for a foldable
• Multitasking: can run 3–4 apps at once
• Premium enjoyment from the foldable form factor (better for YouTube/video/game viewing when opened)

---

Cons mentioned for Fold 8

• Outer screen limitations; not as comfortable as a conventional phone long-term
• Software/app adaptation quirks between inner/outer screens (Instagram, games, YouTube) plus general fold OS errors
• Cameras don’t deliver the “wow” factor versus top alternatives (notably Oppo Find N6) and feel inferior to S26 Ultra
• Removed Flex Mode features
• No S Pen support/hardware included (S Pens remain Ultra-only)
• Durability worries:
  • hinge, IP48 dust/sand ingress, and wear/tear leading to costly repairs

---

Overall user experience (as described)

• The speaker genuinely enjoys the Fold 8 overall, but feels:
  • early excitement fades
  • the fold experience “still feels like it’s missing something,” mainly due to:
    • camera disappointment
    • lack of S Pen
    • durability/maintenance fears
• Implied conclusion: foldables are best as a “try it” or “seasonal” device rather than a permanent replacement.

---

Pricing / value comparisons mentioned

• A common argument is noted: for around €2000, you could buy:
  • S26 Ultra + a Galaxy Tab S10 + watch/headphones
  • (or have money left over)
• In the speaker’s case, pricing is reduced because Samsung lends devices.
• The speaker also mentions finding brand-new Fold 8 units on secondhand sites for roughly €1300–€1350.
• The speaker argues price still matters for “normal people” because €1300 is significant relative to life expenses.

---

Quantitative / explicit numbers mentioned

• Fold 8 internal screen: 7.6 inches
• Charging: 60% in ~30 minutes (closer to 70%)
• Update support:
  • Fold 8: 7 years
  • S26 Ultra: 6 more years
• Camera expectation threshold: adequate for 95% of people
• Durability fear cost example: ~€500 repair

---

Verdict / recommendation (based on the video content)

• Fold 8 recommendation: worth trying, especially as the first Samsung foldable the speaker feels won’t disappoint—but still has bugs, camera limitations, missing S Pen, and durability concerns.
• Final choice for this speaker: Keep the S26 Ultra, because it better fits his needs long-term (especially cameras, anti-glare, durability, and software/habit comfort).
• For most people / “normal” buyers: the speaker suggests the Fold 8 may not be a lifelong choice due to cost, trade-offs, and repair/durability anxiety.

---

Unique points list (all distinct claims mentioned)

1. Samsung lends phones temporarily; must choose which to keep later.
2. S26 Ultra is familiar and easy to use; foldables require adjustment.
3. Fold 8 feels odd for first 2–3 days.
4. Outer Fold screen can feel too short, though usable.
5. Fold 8 is described as a more “different” fold experience than previous Samsung devices.
6. Fold use-case: reduces time using phone when closed; provides mini-tablet when opened.
7. Fold 8 described as best “phone+tablet” concept among Samsung foldables.
8. Inner/outer screen app adaptation issues (Instagram/games/YouTube), plus OS errors.
9. Cameras are adequate for most, but disappointing for tech-focused expectations.
10. Oppo Find N6 camera quality is “light years ahead” of Fold 8.
11. S26 Ultra cameras are more impressive and make him more eager to use the camera.
12. Flex Mode removed; half-open features reduced.
13. Internal crease visibility greatly improved (mostly not noticeable).
14. Fold supports multitasking: 3–4 apps at once.
15. Fold performance advantage over S26 Ultra is minimal (speaker cites ~10% max) and not noticeable daily.
16. Fold 8 battery is strong; Saturday-to-Sunday use without worry (except heavy GPS).
17. Fold 8 stays cooler; doesn’t get hot even in hot weather.
18. Charging: ~60% in 30 min (closer to 70%).
19. Wireless charging, reverse charging, and Maxsafe accessory compatibility mentioned.
20. Fold launches with Android 17 / One UI 9; S26 Ultra expected to get One UI 9 in September.
21. Update duration: 7 years for Fold vs 6 for S26 Ultra.
22. Fold may be replaced sooner due to hinge/screen/dust wear risks.
23. Fold 8 lacks S Pen hardware; S Pens remain Ultra-only.
24. Concern about IP48 dust/sand and hinge/screen durability.
25. Fear of needing costly repair (~€500) from normal wear/tear.
26. Fold screens lack Ultra’s anti-glare screen.
27. Sound comparison at max volume referenced (details not included).
28. Value argument: Fold cost vs buying Ultra + Tab + peripherals.
29. Secondhand pricing near €1300–€1350 for brand-new Fold 8 mentioned.
30. Overall: Fold 8 is great to try; S26 Ultra chosen for better long-term fit.

---

Speakers/views

• Single main speaker (no distinct multi-speaker opinions clearly separated in subtitles).