New Rivian R2 vs BMW iX3! | 4K

Overall comparison

The review compares the BMW iX3, the first of BMW’s new Neue Klasse electric cars, with the Rivian R2, a more affordable, adventure-oriented SUV. The R2 is not expected to be available in Europe until 2028.

There are no formal scores. The reviewer describes the iX3 as an excellent, highly efficient driver’s car, but ultimately prefers the R2 for its more welcoming interior, relaxed character, and overall ease of use.

BMW iX3

Strengths

• A standout electric SUV to drive, with responsive steering, well-managed weight, and more engaging handling than the Rivian.
• Very efficient in the back-to-back test: 4 miles/kWh, compared with the R2’s 3.7 miles/kWh.
• Offers substantially more range on paper—estimated in the review at roughly 80–100 miles more than the Rivian.
• The projected display at the base of the windscreen is useful and keeps key information in the driver’s line of sight.
• Excellent driving position, with a low seat position and good adjustment.

Weaknesses

• The design is criticized as somewhat dumpy, with awkward details such as pop-out door handles, unusual aero wheels, and a plastic interpretation of BMW’s kidney grille.
• The touchscreen-led interior redesign removes the iDrive click wheel and physical controls. Some controls are difficult to reach, and the touch-sensitive buttons are considered frustrating.
• Changing basic settings, such as where the air blows, requires navigating the touchscreen.
• Some interior materials feel cheap or scratchy for a premium car. The reviewer criticizes the plastics, imitation-metal trim, and seat-adjustment controls.
• The large battery contributes to the car’s high weight.
• Despite being the more powerful car by the reviewer’s assessment of how it uses its power, the iX3 still has several irritating design and usability choices.
• The tested example cost $72,000 with options. The US base price was given as about $62,000, with a cheaper single-motor, smaller-battery version planned.

Rivian R2

Strengths

• A clean, distinctive, and relatively unfussy exterior, with a tough stance and recognizable front lighting.
• Practical features include a large front trunk that opens from the exterior and a rear window that opens independently of the tailgate, which is useful for loading and carrying a dog.
• The cabin feels light, spacious, and welcoming, with fabric, open-pore wood, and durable-feeling floor mats.
• Its interface is described as more intuitive and Apple-like than BMW’s. A configurable control wheel can handle functions such as temperature, fan speed, and cruise control, reducing the need to use the screen.
• Thoughtful storage and convenience features include two gloveboxes, a sliding armrest tray, pop-up cupholders, and a switch that lowers all five windows.
• The reviewer finds it calmer and easier to live with, with a relaxed, Volvo-like ride and a “zen” character.
• The tested R2 Performance has 656 hp, an 88 kWh battery, an EPA range of 330 miles, and weighs about 2,250 kg—around 80 kg less than the BMW.
• Pricing is a major draw: the range starts at about $45,000, while the dual-motor Performance starts at $58,000. The tested car cost $62,000, including options.

Weaknesses

• Its range is significantly shorter than the BMW’s, a meaningful drawback for long American road trips and areas with less-developed charging infrastructure.
• The reviewer considers its 656 hp excessive.
• Its driving character is less sporty than the BMW’s: it feels more truck-derived, with softer suspension and more body movement.
• The selectable ride and regeneration settings do not make a dramatic difference. Even the lowest regeneration setting does not let the car coast much.
• It does not offer Apple CarPlay or Android Auto.
• The light-colored interior may be harder to keep clean in family use.
• The charging-flap panel fit is criticized as slightly untidy.

Driving and ownership comparison

The BMW is the better choice for drivers who prioritize maximum range, efficiency, and engaging handling. The Rivian is less focused on sporty driving but feels more relaxed, approachable, and practical.

Both cars have interface-related annoyances, though the reviewer finds the BMW’s more frustrating. The R2’s lower starting price is attractive, but its long-term prospects are uncertain: the reviewer notes that Rivian is burning cash as it scales up production.

Verdict

The reviewer calls the iX3 the best-driving electric SUV of its type, but says it tries slightly too hard with its design and technology. Despite the Rivian’s range disadvantage, the reviewer would choose the R2, finding it cooler, calmer, easier to use, and more complete overall.

Different speaker perspectives

• Main presenter: Praises the BMW’s driving and efficiency but is put off by its interior controls and some material choices. Ultimately favors the Rivian’s comfort, cabin, and everyday usability.
• Alex, the US car correspondent: Says Rivian’s identity is tied to outdoor adventure and that the R2 makes the brand’s premium approach more accessible. He notes that the BMW’s range advantage matters in the US, depending on location and charging access, but also says the R2 is more fun to drive in a spirited way. Both cars have annoyances, with the BMW somewhat harsher.