Xiaomi 17 Ultra Camera Review with Tons of Camera Samples

Xiaomi 17 Ultra camera review — key points from the subtitles

Overall focus

The video is primarily a hands-on camera performance review, using real-world photos and videos captured during trips around Bangalore and Chikmagalur. It also includes usability notes beyond the camera (notably battery and network).

---

Main camera features highlighted

Multi-lens camera system

• 50MP main camera
• 200MP periscope/telephoto camera with variable focal range
  • Optical zoom ranges mentioned: 75mm–100mm
  • Step values referenced, including examples like 4.3 (~85–90mm) and 4.3 = 100mm
  • Zoom support up to 8.6x
  • The speaker clarifies that some zoom ranges are not digital (still/optical), depending on the setting
• 50MP ultra-wide camera
• 50MP front camera

Leica modes / color profiles

• Leica Authentic: more natural, less punchy
• Leica Vibrant: more punchy colors, aimed at a social/Instagram-style look

Portrait mode + bokeh

The review heavily emphasizes:

• Hair blur accuracy
• Realistic subject separation

Video capabilities (rear camera)

• 4K 30
• Also supports 4K 120 and 8K
• Zoom during video referenced at multiple levels: 1X, 2X, 3.2X, 4.3X, up to 8.6X, plus ultra-wide

---

Photo/video performance (what the reviewer claims)

Low-light performance

Strong results including:

• Night shots in a mall
• Scenes at sunset and other dull lighting conditions

Indoor / food photography

• Considered very strong

Outdoor shots

• Gardens and flowers are described as high quality and natural

Telephoto / periscope praise

• Distant-subject capture is highlighted
• Example: a dragonfly shot (taken by a friend; described as stunning)
• Flowers shot using periscope zoom

Portrait mode results

• Impressed with hair blurring, described as incredibly well done and outstanding

Selfies (50MP front)

• Generally good output
• Mentions default skin smoothing, but says it can be disabled in settings

---

User experience notes (non-camera)

Battery

• Battery capacity: 6000 mAh
• Typical everyday use: about 1.5 days
• Heavy camera use example:
  • ~600 photos in ~3 hours drops to about 55%

Network reception

In a low-signal area (a restaurant in Chikmagalur):

• Xiaomi showed 1 bar of 4G
• The reviewer’s iPhone and wife’s Galaxy Fold 5 had no signal
• The reviewer attributes this to better antenna/network handling

---

Comparisons / context mentioned

• Leica color philosophy:
  • “Instagram people” may prefer Vibrant
  • “Purists” may prefer Authentic
• Price comparison (model names not fully detailed):
  • The reviewer claims some other Vivo/Oppo “Ultra” models launched at significantly higher pricing, especially when bundled with kits/accessories
• Friend/enthusiast comparison:
  • A Bangalore camera enthusiast used manual settings and still achieved very strong results, suggesting the phone rewards knowledge (not just auto mode)

---

Pros (explicitly implied/praised)

• Excellent overall photo quality across indoor, outdoor, low-light, food, and everyday subjects
• Very strong portrait/bokeh, especially hair edge blur
• Impressive optical/telephoto range, with good results up to 8.6x
• Good selfie quality, with controllable skin smoothing
• Good video quality across multiple zoom levels
• Battery life around ~1.5 days, usable even with heavy shooting (though photo bursts reduce it faster)
• Network reception advantage in poor signal areas

---

Cons / limitations mentioned

• Default skin smoothing on selfies (toggle available)
• Expensive device (“slightly on the expensive side”)
• No major camera failures were mentioned; the tone is largely positive

---

Unique points mentioned (consolidated)

1. Review based on using the phone for ~2 months and traveling with it.
2. Trip samples include Bangalore (~50 days ago) and Chikmagalur.
3. Bangalore shots used a camera kit; Chikmagalur shots were taken without it.
4. Lens setup: 50MP main + 200MP tele (75–100mm optical range) + 50MP ultra-wide + 50MP front.
5. Leica Authentic vs Leica Vibrant profile differences.
6. Autofocus/shutter speed described as very good (in context of interface/sample).
7. Clarification that certain zoom ranges are not digital.
8. Low-light photos praised (mall, sunset/dull lighting, night scenes).
9. Food and everyday object shots look great.
10. Ultra-wide results look good.
11. Portrait bokeh: exceptional hair blurring.
12. Periscope/telephoto: strong distant-subject capture (dragonfly; flowers).
13. Selfies: good, but default skin smoothing.
14. Video: 4K 30, plus 4K 120 and 8K, with strong multi-zoom performance.
15. Reviewer summary: best for camera enthusiasts, though auto mode works well for novices.
16. Battery: 6000 mAh, ~1.5 days typical; faster drain with extreme photo bursts.
17. Network reception: Xiaomi performed better than iPhone/Galaxy Fold in low-signal conditions.
18. Pricing: described as expensive, with a claim that some competitors’ “Ultra” options cost more.

---

Speaker breakdown

• Single main speaker (Ranjit) handled essentially all camera, battery, network, and pricing commentary, including references to all samples.

---

Concise verdict / recommendation

Recommended if you want a camera-centric phone. The reviewer’s samples and commentary emphasize excellent versatility (wide to long tele, up to 8.6x), strong low-light performance, and standout portrait hair bokeh. They also note that auto mode is surprisingly capable even for non-experts. The main downside mentioned is price, though it’s framed as potentially reasonable compared with some other “Ultra” competitors.