بلایی که الان سر ترامپ اومده زمان درگیری ها در عراق سر جورج بوش هم اومده بود،اما بوش چه کرد؟

Summary

Ali Nouri argues that losing a midterm election does not necessarily prevent a U.S. president from pursuing foreign policy. He compares Donald Trump’s political situation with George W. Bush’s after Democrats won control of Congress in the 2006 midterms.

The video recounts Bush’s response to opposition to the Iraq War. Rather than withdraw troops, Bush authorized the 2007 troop “surge.” Nouri says Democrats tried to use military funding legislation to impose a withdrawal timetable, but Bush vetoed the bill. Congress ultimately passed funding without the withdrawal conditions. Nouri presents this as an example of how a president can resist congressional pressure, particularly on national security.

Nouri applies that comparison to Trump, arguing that a president in the final years of a term may be more willing to take risks because reelection is no longer a concern. He says Trump could continue applying pressure on Iran through sanctions or military action, regardless of Democratic gains in Congress.

The video then advances a broader conspiratorial interpretation. It claims that the military-industrial complex, major financial interests, and organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations exert influence across both parties, while presidents act as public-facing executors of decisions made behind the scenes. As an analogy, Nouri refers to the 2003 Iraq invasion and alleges that U.S. leaders were prepared to manufacture a pretext for war.

Nouri concludes that congressional election results are largely political theater and argues that a wider plan to remove Iran’s government would continue regardless of which party controls Congress.

Context Note

The subtitles contain apparent transcription and date errors. The video’s claims about secret decision-makers and plans against Iran are presented as the speaker’s assertions, not as established facts.

Presenter

Ali Nouri.