НАБУтыливание украинской власти продолжается

Summary of the subtitles

The speaker claims that President Volodymyr Zelensky’s administration is weakening (“collapsing”) and argues that the real political direction comes from Andriy Yermak. According to the speaker, Yermak wanted to force NABU and SAP (Ukraine’s anti-corruption bodies) under presidential control. The speaker says this plan faced resistance, and that Prosecutor General Kravchenko eventually “stepped away” rather than escalate.

Anti-corruption investigation: fraud call centers

A large part of the commentary focuses on an anti-corruption investigation into fraud call centers operating in Ukraine. The speaker says anti-corruption activists published (or are publishing) intercepted recordings involving senior officials from the Prosecutor General’s Office who allegedly protect fraudulent call centers.

Key allegations include:

• Call centers allegedly generate “millions” monthly.
• Roughly 2,000 such centers exist in Ukraine.
  • About half allegedly operate “legally” (with protection).
  • The rest allegedly operate “gray” (without it).
• Allegedly implicated enforcement bodies include: SBU, GUR, the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Prosecutor General’s Office, border guards, and financial monitoring.

Selective enforcement and “payment” pressure

The speaker argues that prosecutors effectively control which criminal cases related to call centers move forward—meaning pressure is applied selectively to push “gray” operators to pay. Allegations include:

• Staging “special operations” shortly after tapes become known, allegedly to force payment rather than pursue a genuine crackdown.
• Advising call center owners how to behave during interrogations.
• Coordinating with foreign (including European) authorities to target competitors, with references to issues involving Czech justice.

Alleged personal corruption in the Prosecutor General’s Office

The narrative shifts to alleged personal corruption within the Prosecutor General’s Office leadership. The speaker introduces two main individuals supposedly identified in the recordings:

• Sergey Kropyvа (described as a deputy head in an area tied to economic crimes and cybersecurity), allegedly appointed without competition.
• Elizaveta Ivakhnenko (described as a young deputy dean in cybersecurity), alleged to be a romantic partner connected to the prosecutor, given the pseudonym “Muse.”

According to the speaker, these figures live together, operate in high-cost environments, and allegedly attempted to conceal wealth once the situation became public. They are portrayed as being involved in protecting call centers and also in broader asset concealment (including relatives’ property and real estate).

Timeline: leaks, shutdowns, and political announcements

The speaker claims leaks and the closing of call-center operations occurred before a major televised/political announcement:

• The speaker says security forces noticed something was coming (a “leak” about 3–4 weeks earlier).
• Then, a large number of call centers operating in Europe and Central Asia were allegedly closed.
• On September 1, Zelensky allegedly announced laws tightening policies.
• The speaker claims prosecutions and searches then targeted offices tied to alleged Russian influence—while portraying this as helping Russia.

Arrests and alleged scheme expansion

The climax is that Kropyvа and Ivakhnenko were detained (described as attempting to flee toward the border), with bail amounts stated.

Another figure, Bohdan Boyko (linked to a Kharkiv football club and call-center supervision), is described as being identified and discussed in connection with the alleged scheme involving competitor elimination and international cooperation.

Final framing: political theater and “next week” targets

The speaker argues that Kravchenko is not finished politically/legal and suggests that the case against others will broaden next week, naming additional people (including alleged suspicions tied to land fraud and testimony).

The speaker ends by framing the entire process as political theater—e.g., “NABU just came to make a fuss”—while implying behind-the-scenes agreements and pressure involving key political figures.

---

Presenters / contributors (named in the subtitles)

• Volodymyr Zelensky
• Andriy Yermak
• Nazar? (referred to as “Dimon”)
• Deputy head of the Presidential Office: Oleksiy? “Oleg Tatarov”
• Prosecutor General: Kravchenko
• SBU head: Malyuk
• Deputy Prosecutor General: Vdovychenko (mentioned as appearing in the second part of the investigation)
• Sergey Kropyvа
• Elizaveta Ivakhnenko (“Muse”)
• Sergei Kutsiy (driver)
• Bohdan Boyko
• Igor Komarov (mentioned in relation to a murder/case described in the subtitles)
• Zelensky (referenced again for the September 1 announcement)
• Oleksandr? “Arakhamia”
• Verkhovna Rada (referenced as an institution, not a person)
• Krivonos (named as likely target of suspicions next week)
• Klemenko (named as likely target of suspicions next week)
• Khristenko (mentioned as providing testimony for Klemenko)