Video summary
The Strategy Behind My $1.6M in Prop Firm Payouts
Main summary
Key takeaways
Finance-focused summary (markets / investing strategy / trading)
The presenter (JJ) describes a prop-firm-only futures trading strategy built around “fair price” / fair auction theory, targeting intraday mean reversion after the New York session open. The approach uses very aggressive trade frequency to meet prop-firm evaluation rules.
Proof / prop-firm payouts mentioned
JJ lists cumulative payouts across multiple prop firms (no tickers shown; appears focused on intraday futures trading):
- Topstep: $292,000 paid out + ~$50K (old dashboard)
- E8: $222,000
- Funded Engineer: $180,000
- My Funded Futures: $92,000
- Funded Next: $129,500 (“right now”)
- Lucid: ~$105,000 total
- Apex: ~$60,000+ (JJ says possibly a bit more)
- Alpha Futures: $75,000 total
- Bulwark Prime: ~$55,000 total
JJ also references performance from 2 weeks of data:
- 80 trades
- 8 days
- ~10 trades/day
- 57.5% win rate
- 1.5 risk-to-reward (explicitly stated: “1.5 risk to reward”)
Markets / instruments / tickers
- No specific ticker symbols are mentioned.
- The strategy is described generically for intraday index/futures-style “points”, using points as the unit for price movement and evaluation constraints (drawdown/profit targets).
Framework / step-by-step methodology
Session timing & setup logic
- Primary session: the New York session open (JJ says it works with other opens, but NY is best)
- Continuation: trade the first ~5 minutes after the open
- Mean reversion window: trade for the next 5 to 90 minutes
- framed as a ~90-minute total session
- Trade frequency goal: ~10 trades/day on the NY AM session
- No maximum trades (per JJ’s description)
“Fair price” concept and targeting
- Fair price is treated as the pre-open / open anchor, where the market is assumed to be “unfairly repriced” at the open due to:
- opening flow
- liquidity imbalances
- stops
- hedging
- momentum participation
- Core premise: the open move is unfair, so price should revert toward fair pricing.
Entry signals
Primary entry: displacement candle (toward fair price)
JJ describes a “zero discretion” rule:
- Body of current candle > body of previous candle
Additionally:
- Optional/discretionary: combine two candles to count as displacement.
Stronger variant: Break of Structure (BOS)
JJ distinguishes setup strength as:
- A+ setup: BOS (stronger confirmation / higher win rate)
- A setup: displacement candle
- B setup: something he says never take (“Just don’t take a B setup.”)
Scaling / layering
- JJ generally: trade each account one at a time and aim to get through all accounts daily.
- Layering is used when already in a trade:
- if price moves toward the trade and then breaks structure in your favor while still in-progress
- JJ explicitly discourages copy trading as a way to “spread risk out” across accounts on prop firms.
Risk management & trade sizing (numbers + rules)
JJ emphasizes that prop-firm evaluation math drives the risk plan.
Standard evaluation trade template (most recaps)
- Stop loss: 25 points
- Take profit: 38 points
- Framed as ~1 to 1.5 risk-to-reward, with 38 repeatedly presented as statistically optimal for evaluations.
When the candle is larger
If the opening candle is larger than 25 points, JJ uses larger sizing, for example:
- Stop: 50 points
- Take profit: 76 points
(Used when candle body exceeds thresholds such as 40–44+ points.)
Targeting rules tied to “prop firm evaluations”
JJ claims prop firms often structure evaluations with:
- $2,000 drawdown
- $3,000 profit target
He argues that keeping trades within 1–1.5R improves pass rate, because of how drawdown trails.
Prop firm vs live account disclaimer
- JJ says the full strategy/risk management is prop-firm only.
- For live trading, he suggests targeting fair price levels rather than fixed evaluation profit targets (without giving live-specific numeric values).
Fair price adjustments (explicit rule)
- JJ sometimes adjusts fair price intraday when volume/price action invalidates the original open anchor.
- Example described: fair price moved “from down here to up here” after consolidation + continuation up, because the expected “revert to open” behavior did not occur.
- News is treated as the primary factor that changes fair price.
News day handling (framework)
JJ distinguishes expected vs unexpected news:
- Expected news (e.g., Red folder at 8:30 a.m., shown via Forex Factory):
- “priced in”
- fair price remains the pre-news area (JJ asserts it stays near where fair price is drawn)
- Unexpected news / surprise tweets:
- changes fair price
- example (Trump tweet): fair price moved to the post-surprise consolidation, not the pre-news level
News trading approach
- Still uses displacement / BOS concepts, but targets multiple “chunks” of the move consistent with prop evaluation constraints.
- JJ references splitting into many smaller standardized evaluation trades (e.g., “13 different trades of 38/25/…” style partitioning), rather than one continuous “live-style” move.
- He notes Trump tweets can cause fast directional moves; JJ enters evaluation trades because it’s “plus EV” (not because the direction is predictable).
Key performance metrics & recommendations/cautions
Metrics
- 57.5% win rate
- 80 trades across 8 days
- Target structure: ~10 trades/day
- 1.5 risk-to-reward framework
Explicit recommendations
- Trade prop firms, not live accounts
- JJ argues live competition is institutional; prop firm rules make it harder for most live-style traders.
- Aim for prop-evaluation optimal R (commonly 25 SL / 38 TP)
- Maintain bias toward reversion to fair price
- Manage risk per account
- Consider only A/A+ setups
- Avoid B setups
Cautions / disclosures
- No explicit “not financial advice” statement appears in the subtitles JJ provided.
- Strong caution is implied:
- “please do not trade live accounts”
- prop-firm evaluation mechanics change risk/targeting logic
Timeline highlights mentioned
- First ~5 minutes: continuation attempt
- Next 5 to 90 minutes: reversion / mean reversion window
- JJ ends trading at 11:00 a.m. on multiple days (JJ says: “I tell myself 90 minutes and I’m done.”)
- News timing examples:
- 8:30 a.m.
- also mentions 10:00 a.m. as another news-related point
Presenters / sources
- Presenter: “JJ” (referred to as the main speaker throughout)
- Source for expected news: Forex Factory (used to identify “red folder” events)