Video summary

Sheldon Dingwall - Mannheim Guitar Summit - full interview

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product(s) discussed

This interview mainly discusses Dingwall bass preamps—specifically:

  • Trickfish preamp (seen on a Z3 at the show)
  • Neve preamp (the most common choice in Dingwall active basses)
  • Darkglass preamp (briefly mentioned)

The rest of the interview also covers Dingwall instrument setup/detail topics (e.g., headroom, technique, intonation/pads/bridge) and upcoming product plans.


Key features / what’s being claimed

Trickfish preamp (on a Dingwall Z3)

  • Sounds “great” and is described as highly musical.
  • Claim: in 30 seconds, you can tell it’s one of the most “musical preamps.”
  • Described as capable of “everything you want” (no detailed controls/features list provided beyond overall tone/musicality).
  • Positioned as having tough competition, yet still a standout.

Neve preamp (dominant in active bass sales)

  • For 85–90% of Sheldon’s customers who buy an active bass, they choose the Neve preamp.
  • He tries to stay neutral, but says the Neve preamp is “amazing” / “simply incredible.”
  • Customers guided to it often report they “can’t imagine anything better.”

Darkglass preamp (niche, but versatile)

  • Fits a metal-focused niche very well and is widely used in metal.
  • Also works for other genres such as pop, funk, and R&B (i.e., not only metal).
  • Framed as a genre/tone “purpose fit,” though exact controls/features weren’t detailed.

Comparisons made (Trickfish vs Neve vs Darkglass)

  • Trickfish vs Neve: Sheldon describes Trickfish as facing “tough competition.”
    • He also uses a playful metaphor (“three-cushion billiards”) suggesting overlapping goals even with different approaches.
  • Neve dominance: Neve is framed as the default choice for most customers (85–90%).
  • Darkglass placement: Excellent for metal, but still usable beyond that niche.
  • Overall framing: multiple excellent options, not a single clear “winner.”

Pros (as stated)

Trickfish

  • Very musical
  • Fast to evaluate (identifiable quickly)
  • Sounds great
  • “Does everything”

Neve

  • Extremely well-liked
  • Described as incredible
  • Most active-bass buyers choose it
  • Strong customer satisfaction

Darkglass

  • Strong utility for metal
  • Still broad enough for other genres
  • Described as fitting its niche well

Practical usability advice included

  • If your amp has a tweeter, upper-mid/high frequencies can sound harsh; lowering tweeter level can help.
  • Technique and setup matter: playing harder can run out of headroom, requiring more EQ.
  • The preamp adds “magic,” but baseline performance depends heavily on technique.

Cons / limitations mentioned

Tweeter harshness (often mistaken for preamp tone)

  • If you hear harsh mid-highs, it may be your tweeter, not the preamp.
  • Recommendation: lower tweeter level.

Technique/headroom limitation

  • Digging in harder can physically push you out of headroom and increase the need for EQ.
  • Implication: you can’t EQ your way out of everything.

Bridge/pads adjustment caution (“brake pads”)

When asked about lowering “brake pads,” Sheldon advises:

  • Make small changes only:
    • Start around half a turn
    • Write down your settings
  • Avoid over-adjusting:
    • Don’t exceed 2–3 turns tightening to avoid crushing pads in
  • Note the effect:
    • It can eliminate/change some low frequencies, and that change is noticeable.

(No explicit “cons” unique to Trickfish/Neve/Darkglass were listed beyond general matching/setup/headroom limits.)


User experience / how it performs in real use

  • Fast evaluation: Trickfish is described as immediately identifiable in tone quality (“in 30 seconds…”).
  • Customer trust loop: Sheldon points to consistent positive customer feedback and high selection rates for Neve.
  • Performance depends on technique: he emphasizes refining technique and working within what the bass/setup can do.
  • Genre coverage:
    • Darkglass: metal-forward but also good for pop/funk/R&B
    • Neve and Trickfish: positioned as broad, “musical” options

Other product/instrument details that came up (beyond preamp reviews)

  • Technique and headroom: louder playing without headroom leads to increased EQ needs.
  • Bridge pad adjustment (“brake pads”)
    • Adjustability is personal/subjective (he and Ryan differ)
    • Changes frequency response, including some low frequencies
  • New “ready-to-play” model: mentioned with no detailed specs, but framed as part of longer-term work
  • Planned roadmap: working for the next 5 years, including 2–3 new models
  • Domestic vs imported production
    • Mostly imported currently
    • Efforts to increase domestic capacity (e.g., integrating an “Effigy”)
    • Mentions Fastlane collaboration with smaller builders, with results not yet satisfying
  • Engineering/production minutiae
    • Tuner peg redesign
    • Tuner alignment (E-string tilt)
    • Five-bolt neck
    • Bolt placement to prevent fret compression
    • Torque sensitivity related to humidity/dryness
    • Emphasis on long development time and tight tolerances

Numerical scores/ratings mentioned

  • 85–90% of active-bass customers choose the Neve preamp.
  • No star ratings or numerical sound scores for Trickfish/Neve/Darkglass beyond that.

Concise verdict / recommendation (based on the interview)

  • Overall: No single declared “winner,” but Trickfish, Neve, and Darkglass are framed as top-tier options, each with different strengths.
  • Most widely chosen “safe bet” (in this customer base): Neve (85–90% selection rate)
  • Most “exciting” for maximum musicality: Trickfish
  • Best match if your main target is metal (with flexibility): Darkglass

Unique points mentioned about the product(s)

  1. Trickfish is very musical; you can tell quickly (~30 seconds).
  2. Trickfish “does everything you want.”
  3. Trickfish competes strongly with Neve.
  4. Neve is selected by 85–90% of active-bass buyers.
  5. Sheldon personally finds Neve “incredible” (despite aiming for neutrality).
  6. Darkglass fits metal well; many metal users.
  7. Darkglass also works for pop/funk/R&B.
  8. Tweeter advice: lower tweeter level if upper-mids sound harsh.
  9. Technique/headroom: harder playing can force more EQ because you run out of headroom.
  10. Preamp adds “magic,” but technique/setup are foundational.
  11. Bridge pad guidance: start small (half turn), write down settings, limit to 2–3 turns, don’t crush pads in.
  12. Pad adjustment reduces/changes some low frequencies.
  13. Upcoming plans: 2–3 new models over time; work spans the next 5 years.
  14. Production sourcing: mostly imported, with domestic integration efforts (e.g., Effigy) and collaboration challenges (e.g., Fastlane).
  15. Engineering emphasis: small mechanical changes (tuner angles, bolt placement, torque) affect playability/buzzing; torque can fail across humidity/dryness.

Speakers / perspectives (from the provided subtitles)

  • John Fox (dealer/interviewer):
    • Asks about the Trickfish preamp
    • References customer feedback/service
    • Prompts practical questions (e.g., tweeter harshness, brake pad adjustment)
  • Sheldon Dingwall (Dingwall):
    • Provides the core comparisons (Trickfish vs Neve vs Darkglass)
    • Makes the 85–90% Neve selection claim
    • Adds tone/genre notes
    • Gives extensive setup/engineering advice

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video