Unit 5 Review Political Participation: Parties & Interest Groups AP Government

Main ideas & concepts covered

1) Why people vote: four theories

• Rational choice voting
  • People vote for the option they believe will benefit them personally the most.
• Retrospective voting
  • Voters look at how the incumbent president/incumbent party has performed.
  • They vote for the incumbent if they think things went well, or against them if they think things went poorly.
• Prospective voting
  • Voters look forward and choose the candidate/party they think will handle future issues best.
• Party-line voting
  • Voters choose candidates strictly based on party affiliation.
  • Example logic given: “all Republicans” or “all Democrats.”

2) U.S. voter turnout: level, causes of low turnout, and effects of state rules

• General pattern
  • Voter turnout in the U.S. is relatively low compared to other Western democracies.
  • Turnout is highest in presidential elections.
  • Turnout is lower in primaries and midterm elections.
• Key causes of low turnout mentioned
  • Registration requirements (needing to register)
  • Elections held on weekdays, which makes it harder for working people
  • (The video notes other reasons exist, but highlights these two as most important.)
• State-by-state factors
  • Voter registration laws affect turnout.
  • Photo ID laws
    • Often decrease turnout
    • Most commonly affects elderly and poor voters (less likely to have active photo IDs).
  • Voting procedures access
    • Early voting
    • Mail-in ballots
    • Absentee ballots
    • More access → increases turnout; less access → decreases turnout.
• Political efficacy
  • People with higher political efficacy are more likely to vote.
  • Meaning: they believe their actions can impact government.
• Demographic groups more likely to vote
  • Higher education
  • Higher income
  • Religious (as stated)
  • White voters (as stated)
• Factors influencing voters’ choice
  • Party identification
  • Ideology
  • Feelings about the candidate (e.g., perceived honesty/trustworthiness)
  • Contemporary political issues (e.g., health care vs. defense/security)
  • Candidate demographic characteristics (as stated)

3) Linkage institutions (context)

• Linkage institutions connect people to the government.
• The video frames the topic as including parties and interest groups as such linkage institutions.

---

Political parties: definition, purposes, and how they influence politics

Definition & goals

• Political party
  • An organization seeking political power by electing members to office.
• Primary purpose
  • Gain power and win elections
• Secondary purpose
  • After gaining power, influence policy

How parties try to win elections

• Mobilization / Get-out-the-vote
  • Encourage supporters to vote to help win elections.
• Educate voters and policymakers
  • Explain what the party “stands for” and what it aims to accomplish.
• Party platform
  • A formal list of policy goals, objectives, and issue positions.
• Recruit and nominate candidates
  • Select candidates for office.
• Support campaigns
  • Raise money
  • Coordinate media strategy to increase visibility of the party and candidates
  • Use communication technology and voter data to send and clarify political messages (noted as modern strategy)

Party influence in government

• Committee system influence
  • Majority party has more members on committees.
• Leadership roles
  • Example roles mentioned: Speaker of the House, majority leader, committee chairs
• Party caucuses
  • Groups of lawmakers that meet to establish goals, often along party lines.
• Party-line voting pressure
  • Many voters/officeholders face pressure to vote with their party.

---

Changing influence of political parties

• Parties have decreased in influence in recent decades.
• Reasons cited:
  • Rise of candidate-centered politics
    • Voters focus on the individual candidate more than party label (“D”/“R”).
  • Party realignment
    • Long-lasting shift in party affiliation over time (maps described from 1928–1930 toward “almost all blue” in the example).
  • Party dealignment
    • People don’t switch as much as they abandon parties (as stated).
  • Decline in party identification/loyalty
  • Campaign finance laws
    • Make it easier to give large amounts to PACs and super PACs
    • Candidates become less dependent on the party for money.
  • Primaries
    • Party members—not party leaders—choose candidates.

---

Minor/third parties: why they struggle in the U.S.

• The U.S. is described as a two-party system, dominated by Democrats and Republicans, but other parties exist.
• Structural barriers listed; the video explains two in detail and adds an informal barrier:
  • Winner-take-all voting districts (major focus)
    • District votes elect the candidate who wins the most votes in that district.
    • Problem for third parties: winning 10% everywhere still may produce zero seats.
    • Contrast: with proportional representation, parties would receive seats based on their share of votes.
  • Single-member districts (major focus)
    • One person represents the district; the runner-up gets nothing.
    • Therefore, it’s hard for a third party to come in first.
  • Informal barriers (major parties co-opt issues)
    • Major parties adopt popular ideas from third parties (e.g., environmental issues attributed to Democrats taking from the Green Party).
    • This can:
      • Make third-party success harder
      • Reduce voter willingness because supporters feel their vote “doesn’t matter”
    • Informal because there’s no direct law preventing action like more spending; it’s more about strategy and media/influence.

---

Interest groups: definition, functions, and influence

Definition & growth

• Interest groups
  • Organizations that attempt to influence policy.
• They are described as increasing in number and influence.
• Difference from parties:
  • Parties must take positions on many issues to build electoral coalitions.
  • Interest groups can be narrow and specific, which contributes to their growth.

Functions of interest groups

• Educate voters and officeholders
• Draft legislation
  • Lobbyists often work with members of Congress to write/edit bills at state, local, and federal levels.
• Mobilize their membership
  • Encourage supporters to contact representatives, vote, etc.
  • Example mentioned: NRA with “millions of members.”
• Iron triangles and issue networks
  • Iron triangle relationship described:
    • Congressional committees + bureaucratic agencies + interest groups
  • Symbiotic logic:
    • Committees write legislation
    • Interest groups ensure it benefits them
    • Agencies implement administrative rules/regulations
    • Interest groups offer support, including monetary support and electoral support
    • This can translate into strong, lasting influence.

Additional political activities mentioned

• Create PACs
• Contribute to super PACs
• Endorse candidates
• Engage in ads, protests, and get-out-the-vote efforts
• Use campaigns to influence both public opinion and election outcomes

---

Lobbying approaches described

• Lobbying Congress
  • Lobbyists provide information because they are issue experts.
  • Congress members are described as policy generalists.
• Lobbying courts (litigation approach)
  • Not face-to-face; interest groups file lawsuits to change policy through the courts.
  • File amicus curiae briefs to the Supreme Court (support/argue without being the direct party).
• Grassroots lobbying
  • Influence public opinion directly so the public contacts representatives and takes action.

---

Potential problems / critiques of interest groups

• Inequality of political and economic resources
  • Some interest groups are much more powerful due to money and membership.
  • This gives them greater access to decision-makers than smaller groups.
• Hyperpluralism
  • Too many groups prevents compromise and leads to gridlock.
  • This is presented as a critique of pluralist democracy.
• Revolving door
  • Members of Congress may leave office to work for interest groups they previously dealt with, often doing lucrative lobbying.
• Social movements
  • Broad-based grassroots efforts aimed at major policy change.
  • Compared with interest groups:
    • Often lack formal leadership and infrastructure
    • May have less clear policy objectives and time limits (as stated)
    • However, they can still gain momentum and achieve major changes.

---

Speakers / sources featured

• College Board
  • Referenced as the source of some content/wording about modern party communication technology and voter data.
• No specific individual speaker is identified in the subtitles.