Video summary
Should you buy Nexon Diesel in 2025 | New Tata Nexon Diesel AMT Drive🔥| Better than 3XO ?
Main summary
Key takeaways
Product reviewed
Tata Nexon Diesel (AMT) — specifically the Creative Plus S variant (mentioned as being driven in the video).
Key features mentioned
- Powertrain: 1.5L 4-cylinder diesel, ~113 bhp and 260 Nm torque
- Transmission: AMT (Automated Manual Transmission) with paddle shifters (via +/−); also uses Sport mode
- Ride/handling tech:
- TPMS
- Large touchscreen
- 360° camera (camera quality praised)
- Lighting/indicator mentions: LED features (LED DRLs/indicators referenced; exact items not clearly listed)
- Safety: 5-star safety rating (no specific body/NCAP variant details given)
- Driver assistance: electronic safety/driver-assist behavior described as “tech” that may intervene too much
- Other usability/electronics: 12V socket + Type-C ports referenced (positioning discussed later)
Driving / user experience (reviewer impressions)
Engine, refinement, noise
- Low-speed noise: diesel noise is more noticeable only at higher RPM; at low RPM, noise entry into the cabin reduces.
- Vibration: no meaningful vibration reported; contrasted with the older 2019 Nexon, where vibration was felt.
Pickup & AMT behavior (main critique)
- Initial pickup: “good,” especially for starting off.
- Main downside: AMT jerk/shift feel, especially:
- During low-speed crawling, shifts feel smoother overall, but some jerk remains.
- Between 2↔3 and 3↔4, jerk is more noticeable.
- At high speed, if you suddenly accelerate/pull, there can be lag/disappointment versus torque-converter automatics.
- Comparison (smoothness): the video claims a torque converter is smoother than this AMT.
Steering, stability, braking, suspension
- Steering feedback: good; steering weight feels solid even at ~80 km/h
- Stability in turns: “feels good” during sudden steering and sharp turns at 80–90
- Braking: example around ~90 km/h—car drifts slightly, but braking felt good
- Suspension (praised):
- Not stiff
- Glides well at high speed
- Claimed to be better than segment comparisons, specifically mentioning Hyundai/Sonet
Visibility & ergonomics
- Ergonomics: controls feel within reach; no major ergonomics issues noted.
- AC controls: touch buttons; reviewer notes people may need time to get used to them.
- Wiper/controls access: headlight/wiper stock placement described as a bit far and smaller than ideal.
- Blind spot: thick A-pillar causes a blind spot, especially during highway/hill turning.
Mileage / economy claims
- City mileage: 15–16 km/l (live reading mentioned around 17 km/l)
- Company claim: 25 km/l
- Reviewer conclusion: mileage is “good”; it doesn’t feel like numbers will drastically worsen.
Pricing / variant context
- On-road price: around ₹14.5 lakh (Ujjain context)
- Another reference: ₹15.4 lakh on-road in Indore
- Note: exact basis/OTR breakup not fully explained.
Pros mentioned
- Strong diesel performance feel in Sport mode (“power feels amazing”)
- Stability and safe handling, good steering weight/response
- Comfortable suspension and good high-speed composure
- Good features for the money (TPMS, touchscreen, 360° camera quality praised)
- Safety rating: 5-star
- Improved refinement vs older Nexon (less vibration)
- Low-speed driving suits AMT: jerk is less troublesome if you don’t pull hard
Cons mentioned
- AMT jerk/shift feel (notably 2→3 and 3→4, plus lag if accelerating suddenly at higher speeds)
- Diesel cabin noise (though less at low RPM)
- Thick A-pillar blind spot
- Wiper stalk placement (far and small)
- Service experience complaint trend: Tata service inconsistency attributed to showroom variability
- Quality/fit-finish concerns: panel gaps visibility criticized (example cited from delivery/other situation)
- Charging port accessibility: cable holes/ports placed very low, making plugging awkward (must insert carefully)
Comparisons made with similar cars
- Versus torque converter automatics: Nexon AMT described as less smooth than torque-converter setups.
- Versus K Sonet: video claims K Sonet has a proper torque converter in this segment (implying smoother drive).
- Versus Hyundai: suspension quality claimed better than Hyundai options (Hyundai mentioned generally).
- Versus XUV 3XO: video notes XUV 3XO diesel AMT exists; AMT behavior is said to be broadly similar.
- Versus Tata Sonet (sound): diesel sound “enters inside” in this Nexon; compared against Sonet lacking the same sound trait.
Overall verdict / recommendation
Buy recommendation depends on driving style:
- If you mostly drive in city/slow speeds and want stability, features, safety, and refinement, the AMT can be acceptable.
- If you often accelerate hard / drive at higher speeds and expect torque-converter-like smoothness, the video warns that AMT lag/jerk will be noticeable, making it less ideal.
Unique points mentioned (consolidated)
- Stability feels good; Tata car reliability in stability.
- AMT present; causes some jerk vs torque converter.
- Torque converter would be smoother.
- Thick A-pillar causes blind spot during turning.
- Diesel noise enters cabin more at higher RPM; less at low RPM.
- 1.5L diesel engine: ~113 bhp and 260 Nm.
- Pickup is good in AMT.
- Less vibration vs the 2019 model.
- Ergonomics/control reach is good.
- AC controls are touch-based; initial learning curve.
- Wiper/headlight stalk access: a bit far/small.
- Visibility otherwise good (bonnet/windshield/ORVM).
- AMT shift behavior: noticeable jerk during 2→3 and 3→4.
- At high speed sudden pull causes lag/disappointment.
- Steering feedback and weight are good even at ~80 km/h.
- Stability during sudden steering/sharp turns (80–90).
- Suspension: not stiff; better than Hyundai/Sonet (claimed).
- Mileage: 15–16 km/l city, live ~17 km/l; company claim 25.
- Cruise control present; feature richness emphasized.
- Variant pricing references: ~₹14.5L OTR (Ujjain) / ₹15.4L OTR (Indore).
- TPMS + touchscreen + 360° camera quality praised.
- Sport mode: diesel power feel amazing.
- Braking example: some drift but braking performance good.
- Safety: 5-star rating.
- Service experience complaints are common (showroom-dependent).
- Fit/finish quality/panel gaps criticized.
- AMT recommended mainly for slow driving; otherwise manual is “more correct.”
- Paddle shifters available.
- Some tech systems may intervene aggressively; user may later disable features.
- Sound characteristic: diesel sound enters cabin; compared to Sonet.
- Ports/cable holes placed too low and awkward; must insert carefully.
- Software update (after recent model arrival) improved stability/working perfectly.
Speakers / views
- Rohit Chauhan (primary reviewer/driver): Provided impressions on engine, AMT behavior, ergonomics, mileage, handling, features, quality, service commentary, and comparisons.