Summary of "Полная Прожарка🔥 Смартфон Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra Разрушаем Мифы"
Summary of the Review: Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra
Main Features
-
Processor & Performance: Equipped with a mid-to-upper-range chipset (8 Gen 3), the Poco F7 Ultra handles games and synthetic benchmarks like 3D Mark without crashing. However, it is not flagship-level performance and exhibits some throttling and heating under prolonged stress.
-
Display: The phone offers good pixel density but lacks advanced features such as a 144Hz refresh rate and LTPS/LTPS technology, which are common in sub-flagship phones. Brightness levels vary, with occasional reset issues during gaming.
-
Camera: The main camera performs adequately but is not outstanding; photos sometimes show flaws compared to true flagship devices. The front camera is limited to 1080p at 60fps, with no 4K support or autofocus. There is no telephoto lens.
-
Battery & Charging: Supports fast charging at 50W, fully charging in about 31 minutes. Battery life is decent—capable of recording 4 hours of 4K60fps video continuously and sustaining gaming for hours with moderate heating. Battery discharge speeds up below 20-25%. No wireless charging available.
-
Build & Extras: Features a metal frame, physical proximity sensor, and infrared port. Lacks IP68 or moisture protection. Uses an older USB 2.0 port. No headphone jack or memory card slot.
-
Software & Connectivity: Global version includes all bands and certifications. Bluetooth version discrepancy noted (5.4 vs 6.0). Game mode and performance boosting features are present but not fully optimized. Firmware updates have improved stability and brightness behavior.
-
Price: Launch price was around 56,000 rubles (~$600), including customs fees. Considered expensive for the features offered. Comparable or better devices are available in the same price range (e.g., Xiaomi 15 global, Realme 14 Pro Plus, Vivo X200 Pro Mini, OnePlus 13R).
Pros
- Stable performance in synthetic benchmarks and games without crashing
- Fast charging (50W) with relatively good battery endurance
- Does not overheat excessively during extended gaming or video recording
- Metal frame and decent build quality
- Global version with all necessary network bands and certifications
- Can record 4 hours of 4K60fps video continuously
- Infrared port and physical proximity sensor included
Cons
- Average camera quality with no standout features; front camera lacks 4K and autofocus
- Display lacks 144Hz refresh rate and LTPS technology, impacting smoothness and efficiency
- No IP68 water/dust resistance
- Outdated USB port (USB 2.0)
- No headphone jack or microSD card support
- Price considered high for the feature set; better options exist at similar or lower prices
- Brightness reset issues during gaming
- Battery discharge speeds up below 20-25%
- No wireless charging despite fast wired charging
- Lacks flagship-level accessories ecosystem (no flagship headphones, watches, or coolers)
- Firmware still has minor optimization issues; some users report video playback and streaming glitches
- No eSIM support
- No triggers or gaming-specific hardware buttons
User Experience & Observations
- The reviewer tested the device extensively over weeks, including gaming, 3D Mark stress tests, video recording, and real-world use.
- The device performed consistently well during streams and tests, without crashes or overheating.
- Some users and other reviewers report issues, but the reviewer’s unit showed stable behavior, suggesting variability by unit or firmware.
- Brightness resets during gaming, which can be annoying.
- Touchscreen sensitivity was sometimes slippery or sticky; configurable in game mode.
- Not recommended for users wanting flagship-level cameras or display features.
- Described as a “good device for 40,000 rubles,” but overpriced at launch (~56,000 rubles).
- Compared to Xiaomi 15 global and other sub-flagship models, which offer better value or features.
- Lacks the ecosystem and premium features that define true sub-flagship or flagship phones.
- Recommended to wait for a price drop to around 40,000 rubles before considering purchase.
Comparisons
- Xiaomi 15 Global: Superior performance and camera for similar or slightly higher price.
- Realme 14 Pro Plus: Better camera features including telephoto lens, and cheaper.
- Vivo X200 Pro Mini & Oppo Find X8: Comparable or better sub-flagship options.
- OnePlus 13R/13: Better overall package but slightly more expensive.
- Poco X7 Pro: Cheaper alternative for tighter budgets.
- Poco F7 Ultra lacks features like 144Hz display, LTPS screen, bypass charging, and gaming triggers present in some competitors.
Overall Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F7 Ultra is a stable and reasonably performing mid-range smartphone with fast charging and decent battery life. It handles gaming and benchmarks well without overheating or crashing. However, it falls short in camera quality, display technology, and premium features like water resistance and wireless charging. Its launch price is considered too high given the competition, and it is recommended to wait for a significant price drop (around 40,000 rubles) before purchase. The phone suits users who prioritize solid performance and battery life but are willing to compromise on camera and display features.
Different Perspectives from Speakers
- The main reviewer (Sanya) provides a detailed, pragmatic assessment based on long-term testing and real use.
- Some viewers and other reviewers reportedly experienced issues (video glitches, overheating), but these were not observed by the main reviewer.
- The reviewer acknowledges variability in device behavior and firmware optimization.
- Discussion about the lack of ecosystem and accessories for Poco brand devices compared to competitors.
- Emphasis on market pricing and sales trends influencing purchase decisions.
- Recognition that personal preferences and priorities vary, and the phone may suit some users but not others.
Summary
Poco F7 Ultra is a competent mid-range device with good performance and battery life but lacks flagship-level camera, display, and premium features. Overpriced at launch, it is better considered after price drops. Suitable for users who want solid hardware without flagship expectations.
Category
Product Review
Share this summary
Is the summary off?
If you think the summary is inaccurate, you can reprocess it with the latest model.