"Tomorrow": What Pharaoh's Answer Reveals About a Hardened Heart

Main ideas, concepts, and lessons

Context: the plagues in Exodus 8

• The speaker reviews earlier events in Egypt:
  • Aaron’s rod replaces/makes the magicians’ rods ineffective.
  • The Nile is turned to blood (fish die; the river becomes foul and economically damaging).
• The focus then shifts to God’s second major plague in Exodus 8:
  • Frogs, followed by lice, and then flies.

God’s message to Pharaoh

• God commands Moses to confront Pharaoh with the demand: “Let my people go that they may serve me.”
• Each plague is presented as:
  • Judgment and
  • Proof that the events are supernatural and purposeful, not random.

Moses as political engagement (argument against non-involvement)

• The speaker stresses that Moses went to a secular ruler (Pharaoh) with God’s demands.
• From this, the speaker argues that biblical faith allows (and sometimes requires) involvement in politics, citing examples such as:
  • Daniel
  • Leaders like Nehemiah (and an implicit reference to the “three friends”).

Plague mechanics: judgment affects everyone, but God controls timing

Frogs

• Frogs invade widely: in houses, food, beds, ovens, etc.
• The speaker emphasizes that Pharaoh was not spared—God does not treat Pharaoh as fundamentally different from others.

Hardened heart and delayed consequence

• Pharaoh asks Moses to entreat God to remove the frogs.
• When Moses asks when, Pharaoh replies “Tomorrow.”
• The speaker uses this to illustrate:
  • a hardened heart can prevent clear thinking,
  • leading Pharaoh to tolerate the plague one more day.
• God removes the frogs exactly according to Pharaoh’s requested time, reinforcing that God controls events precisely.

God “flows through people,” requiring human participation

• The speaker highlights that God works through Moses and Aaron, not apart from them.
• Key claim: even when God is sovereign, the working is presented as happening through appointed people.
• Moses and Aaron must still petition God after speaking judgment.
• Support is drawn from passages such as Ephesians (God works according to power “in us”) and the claim that God does not act without revealing to His servants.

The power of spoken words

• The speaker argues that what people speak can shape outcomes:
  • God “did according to the word of Moses.”
• Proverbs 18:21 is cited:
  • “Death and life are in the power of the tongue.”
• Application: if someone speaks defeat (e.g., “nothing works for me,” “I’m not healed”), they may be reinforcing that outcome.

Lice plague: created life from dust

• The lice plague is framed as different from the earlier plagues:
  • Earlier events involve transforming existing elements or producing creatures through rod/water symbolism.
• For lice:
  • Moses and Aaron smite dust, and it becomes lice.
• This is described as a creative miracle—life emerging from what had no life in itself.
• The magicians cannot replicate it and acknowledge: “This is the finger of God.”

Flies plague: separation between Israel and Egypt

• For flies, God explicitly states He will sever/divide the land where His people dwell, so His people are not harmed.
• The speaker applies this to theology of favor and covenant:
  • God “has favorites” in the sense that believers/covenant people receive protection and blessing not shared by those outside covenant.
• Christians should expect a difference from the suffering of unbelievers (not necessarily every individual experience, but a principle of redemption/protection).

Pharaoh’s compromise and continued resistance

• Pharaoh eventually allows worship “in the land” (but not full departure).
• Moses rejects this as inadequate because Egyptians would view certain sacrifices (notably cattle) as an abomination and respond violently.
• Pharaoh offers partial release (“don’t go very far”); Moses presses for the required approach.
• After Moses prays for removal of the flies:
  • the flies are removed completely,
  • yet Pharaoh hardens his heart again and refuses.

---

Methodology / instruction list (as presented)

God’s instruction to Pharaoh (repeated pattern)

• Moses goes to Pharaoh with God’s direct demand:
  • Command: “Let my people go that they may serve me.”
  • Warning: If Pharaoh refuses, specific plagues will come.

Timing negotiation concept (example from frogs)

• If Pharaoh asks for relief:
  • Moses tells Pharaoh he can name the time.
• The speaker presents this as a test showing:
  • Pharaoh’s hard heart, and
  • God’s control over outcomes.

Human participation after speaking

• Even after declaring judgment, Moses and Aaron:
  • cry out / petition God for the plague to stop.
• Application emphasized:
  • believers must pray, speak, and “release authority” rather than assume blessings happen automatically without participation.

Word-based faith application (spoken outcomes)

• The speaker teaches:
  • words carry spiritual weight,
  • believers should speak in line with God’s promises (e.g., healing, provision),
  • rather than repeating negative outcomes.

---

Speakers / sources featured

Primary speaker

• Unspecified male narrator/teacher (the speaker of the commentary)

Scripture sources referenced (Bible)

• Exodus 8 (main text being discussed)
• Ephesians 3:20
• Ephesians 1:3
• Mark 11:23
• Proverbs 18:21
• 1 Peter 2:24
• Also referenced:
  • Genesis 1
  • Exodus 23
  • A general reference to Joseph and Egyptians’ attitude toward cattle

Individuals mentioned (biblical figures)

• Moses
• Aaron
• Pharaoh
• Egyptian magicians