Noch ein Chinesischer-Nostradamus-Text ab 2022: Tui Bei Tu

Overview

The video introduces and interprets a Chinese prophetic text attributed to a “Chinese Nostradamus.” It is described as a collection of 60 poems (and matching images), similar in style and structure to the European Nostradamus tradition.

The host emphasizes that the text—named from a phrase connected to the images inside it—has multiple interpretations and is not tied to a single exact year, so different interpreters often map its verses onto current events in conflicting ways.

---

Core Framework: How the Host “Dates” the Poems

The host explains two main methods:

1. Calendar-matching method Align the poems with the Chinese sexagenary (60-cycle) system using the associated Heavenly Stems/Earthly Branches and five elements.

2. Event-sequence method Treat the poems as steps that advance when major world events occur. Under this approach, the discussion for 2022 is placed near the end of the cycle.

The year under consideration is linked to the Year of the Water Tiger (Renchen), but the host notes that different authors place the relevant moment at different poem numbers, sometimes influenced by political or ideological motives.

---

Poem Interpretations

Poem #56 (Earth/Goat): Conflict and Decisive Firepower

The host first presents poem 56, claiming it corresponds to an imminent conflict period.

Key interpretive focus:

• The imagery suggests chaos building across multiple “elements” (land/sea/air).
• Firepower is portrayed as more decisive than the number of soldiers.

Modern connections mentioned:

• Wars such as Ukraine, suggesting present conflict dynamics resemble the poem’s themes.
• Some interpreters even view it as possibly foreshadowing a nuclear third-world-war scenario, though the host treats this as uncertain.

Timeframe note:

• Using an alternative cyclical reading, the “next Earth/Goat year” would be much later—around 2039—implying turbulence could extend well beyond 2022.

---

Poem #39 (Water Tiger): Recurring Instability Until a “Peace” Year

Next, the host compares with poem #39, tied to the Water Tiger reading.

Interpretation themes:

• The lines are read as pointing to conflict and disruption, driven by recurring historical drivers (the host lists war, major disasters, and epidemics).
• Imagery such as “bird without a foot” is interpreted as referencing disruptive modern technology or events (the host speculates about aerial/flying objects or night-related disturbances).

Calendar/time mapping:

• A referenced timeframe is mapped onto the 12th month of the Chinese calendar, with alternatives pointing to December or January depending on historical calendar usage.
• “Southern power plant” vs. “northern mountain network” is interpreted as regional disagreement, possibly disrupting trade/supply chains—including concerns like gas shortages.
• “Golden rooster” is associated with the West and later time markers, including a link to September and metal-rooster cycles.

Peace timing (per this reading):

• Peace may return only after the next Year of the Rooster, suggested around 2029, but possibly as late as 2041 if the “golden rooster” marker is applied more strictly.

Overall conclusion from the host:

• Because there are multiple readings, the text implies many years of conflict rather than certainty about a single exact event.
• The appropriate response is preparation and adaptation, not prediction precision.

---

Additional Themes: Global Perception, Climate Change, and a “New Age”

Beyond war, the host argues several additional points:

• How conflicts are perceived varies People notice conflicts differently depending on proximity and economic impact. Africa’s conflicts are described as ongoing but less “felt” elsewhere because global supply chains may remain intact.

• Broader than China The prophetic text may be read “energetically,” implying relevance beyond China to a wider world.

• Transition to a “new age” The host references a “period 9,” saying a transitional phase starting 2017 would complete by 2024, bringing new energies.

• “Sea sinking” as climate metaphor The host treats “sea sinking” imagery as a metaphor for rising sea levels driven by melting polar ice, framing it as a scientifically supported climate risk that could become more consequential in the coming years.

---

Final Takeaway

The video does not claim absolute precision. Instead, it argues that under either major interpretive method, the text suggests:

• worsening conflict dynamics in the near future,
• weapon capability/firepower as a decisive factor,
• possible regional economic/supply-chain disruption,
• and longer-term instability until at least a rooster-year peace marker (potentially 2029, possibly 2041).

Host’s recommended stance: Stay pragmatic—be prepared and minimize impact through adaptation.

---

Presenters / Contributors

• Main presenter/host: The unnamed speaker (no clear name given in the subtitles).
• Mentioned (not presenters): Cornelia K., “Jim” (as a 17th-century commentator), and various referenced historical/calendar commenters/interpreters within the host’s discussion.