Video summary
Comment j'ai fait plus de 200K$ en 35 jours grâce à Trendtrack + Claude (copie moi)
Main summary
Key takeaways
Business strategy (product discovery → brand-building → automation)
- Positioning: Find early, scalable products that can become a brand + ecosystem—not just “trend grabs.”
- Core execution thesis: Identify new product opportunities by spotting recently launched shops with heavy ad activity (a proxy for traction/validation). Then use AI to turn research into a ranked shortlist and a go-to-market testing plan.
Framework / playbook embedded in the method
1) TrendTrack product sourcing filters (manual “patterns”)
Shop origin filter
- Exclude India + Pakistan
- Reason: lower traffic quality and more frequent copying of US offers.
- Low CPM/CPC doesn’t justify the approach.
Recency filter
- Creation date: last 30 days
- Optional adjustment: 60 days to modify timelines.
Ad-volume filter (traction proxy)
- Ads: minimum 50 ads in the last 24 hours
- Rationale: spy tools can lag and show “zero traffic” at first.
- Meta live ads indicate the store is actively testing and scaling.
2) Product selection criteria (what to keep vs skip)
Prefer products that show
- Sustained / rising ad activity
- Newness in concept/angle
- Avoid “the same product” that’s been around for 2–3 years.
- Clear marketing angles
- e.g., fear/anxiety narratives, seasonal needs, specific demographics
- Brand/AV (avatar) expansion potential
- Prefer non-commodity positioning.
Avoid / be cautious with
- Products that are too established or dominated by big brands (especially in cosmetics).
- Supplements in the US
- High CPMs for ~6 months per speaker.
- Some categories described as harder/complex operationally (notably supplements).
Category guidance
- For recurring-style purchases: cosmetics instead of dietary supplements (better/more manageable).
- US “food supplements” not recommended; for supplements-like needs, consider launching in Europe/UK.
3) AI automation using Claude + TrendTrack API (MCP/Cloud)
Workflow change
- Replace 2–3 hours of manual market + competitor + angle analysis with ~10 minutes automated analysis (then review).
Output of the automation
- A product search table
- Top 10 products ranked with scoring
- For each product:
- avatars/subavatars
- marketing angles
- competitors
- target markets
- Generates a structured “what to test” instruction set for ads + landing/site build.
4) Scoring logic (margin/ROI-centric)
Margin target used in scoring
- Prefer products with at least “X4 margin” logic:
- “products I want to launch are products that have at least a margin of X4”
- phrased as: sales CF of 2 × 4
- intent: high margin
- Color-coded scoring:
- X3 acceptable to launch
- preference is higher margin
Additional “quality checks” included
- COGS (from AliExpress / cross-checked)
- Active ads and ad formats
- Main angle + perceived value
- Seasonality (or sells all year)
- Shipping/weight fit
- lighter = cheaper shipping → better unit economics
- LTV relevance (explicitly referenced)
Key metrics & KPIs mentioned
-
Revenue + profitability case result
- Found a product in February via this method:
- >$200,000 revenue in ~5 weeks
- >20% margin
- Found a product in February via this method:
-
Research speed / operational KPI
- Manual: 2–3 hours
- Automated method: 10–15 minutes
- Prompt creation took weeks, but ongoing usage is fast.
-
Ad-based traction metric
- ≥ 50 ads in last 24 hours
- Store/shop created within last 30 days
-
Marketing test budget guidance (CBO)
- $50/day starting out
- $100/day with larger budgets
-
Targeting details used for testing (avatar age bands, examples)
- 25–38
- 30–45
- 50–65 (tested as a separate sub-avatar)
- 18–24 (sub-avatar example)
-
Time to handle prompt
- ~10 minutes, sometimes requiring “continue” clicks a couple times.
Concrete examples / use cases (how outputs are applied)
Category and angle examples seen during browsing
- Pets/animals products (“trendy,” heavy scaling)
- Products targeting elderly using fear/anxiety angles
- Copper-related offering with fear/benefit positioning
- Weight loss products scaling with heavy ad presence
- Cosmetics sub-niches:
- dark circles / under-eye
- peptide-based creams
- leggings/shorts variations
Market expansion / avatar strategy examples from AI output
US scenario
- Primary avatar inferred: men 25–38 (professional/lifestyle)
- Sub-avatar example: students 18–24
- hook: “low school pain / attention crisis”
- Recommended actions:
- Test 2 sub-avatar creatives (video/testimonial/trucker style)
- Use $50/day CBO budget
- Creative structure example:
- “9:16 Hook, Hour 10 of my shift”
- Targeting detail:
- interests + Facebook Job Categories
France scenario (seasonality/event-based)
- Example men targeting: 30–45 for a pre-summer product
- Test men 50–65 due to a “real issue” (elder men concerns)
- Event-based angle:
- urgent wedding season (May–June)
- build a story like: “my son’s wedding in 3 weeks, I need to be ready”
Actionable recommendations
- Use the filter combo to find “validated testing” stores:
- Exclude India/Pakistan
- Last 30 days
- ≥ 50 ads / 24h
- Skip categories with unfavorable economics:
- Avoid US supplements (high CPMs ~6 months) → consider Europe/UK
- Build around ecosystem potential:
- Choose products where you can develop a niche store and repeatable brand messaging (not just a one-off sale).
- Operationalize the process:
- Connect Claude ↔ TrendTrack via MCP + API key to generate:
- top-10 shortlist
- competitor set
- avatar + sub-avatar plan
- recommended creatives and testing actions per market
- Connect Claude ↔ TrendTrack via MCP + API key to generate:
- After AI shortlist:
- Manually verify shop/product logic:
- ensure the shop isn’t “repackaging” ads across unrelated products (speaker notes scams/relauched shops with different FB pages).
- Manually verify shop/product logic:
High-level tech / implementation steps (business enablement)
- Get MCP URL from doc.trentrack.io → Integrations
- Configure the connector in Claude “Cloud” settings → Connector → Custom connector
- Create and copy a TrendTrack API key
- Paste API key into the provided prompt
- Run the prompt:
- it analyzes shops over the selected date window (example shown: “analyze shops over 30 days”)
- may require Continue a few times
Presenters / sources
- Givan (main presenter)
- Mentions “Alex” and a team involved.
- References TrendTrack and Claude/Anthropic integration.
- Only Givan is explicitly named as a presenter.
Rate this summary
Your feedback will help improve summaries.
Improve this summary
Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.
Translate summary in another language
Ask questions to this video
Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.