Video summary
This Trade Has Serious Potential
Main summary
Key takeaways
Overview (Earnings Failure Options Trade on COST)
The presenter proposes/holds an “earnings failure” trade on Costco (COST) after its latest earnings release. The goal is to profit from a fast post-earnings directional unraveling, where the market’s initially favorable/contained reaction fails to sustain and price moves in the intended direction.
Catalyst Timing
- Earnings reported: ~4:15 p.m. ET (yesterday)
- Earnings call: ~5:00 p.m. ET
- Immediate reaction: described as choppy/whipsaw (mixed information absorbed quickly)
- Overnight bias: stock traded lower during the overnight session, even though earnings appeared to “beat estimates” on the surface
Trade Setup Logic
Fundamental / Consensus Interpretation
- Even though reported numbers beat estimates, the presenter believes the forward outlook / analyst reaction is bearish.
- They cite analyst target downgrades across the board as evidence that guidance/earnings quality is not truly strong.
- A “beat” contribution is mentioned as being related to tariffs (described as “a t to a tariff fund”).
Price Action Confirmations
- Bottom tick: occurred at the open
- Stock is green on the day (~+2.3%) at the time referenced
- Technical observations:
- An engulfing candle on the daily chart after the S&P made new cash-session lows around ~9:56 a.m.
- Stop-outs may occur due to price undercutting previous lows (including new year lows)
- The stock shows exhaustion in selling and is bouncing from the lower end of a ~2-year range
- Reference: “August 2024” and that COST hasn’t done much in ~2 years
- Market context: the S&P 500 moved higher early, then reversed to new lows; COST’s relative strength is used as supporting evidence.
Options Strategy (Back Spread)
Instrument and Structure
- Instrument: COST options (calls)
- Structure: Back spread
- Sell one call strike
- Buy a higher strike call
Expiration
- November expiration
Strikes Sold / Bought
- Sell: 910 calls
- Buy: 945 calls
Expected Behavior / Payoff Zone
- Current spot referenced: ~918 (also described as in a “19 range” due to chart zoom/scale)
- Worst-case framing (P/L shape explanation):
- If the stock rallies and “chills out” near ~950, that’s described as the worst case area for this back spread payoff.
Risk and Profit Expectations (Explicit Numbers)
If the Stock Moves Sharply Lower
- Worst case at expiration: ~$1,000 mentioned as worst case (described as “basically come expiration” in the presenter’s model)
If the Stock Rallies and Holds (Not the Intended Case)
- Example scenario: ~930 on Nov 1 (about $12 above current)
- Loss could be: ~-$3,800
Trade Management / Exit Discipline
- The presenter emphasizes earnings failure trades should work quickly.
- If momentum fails or price breaks the thesis level, they plan to exit rather than “let it marinate.”
- Example of an underlying-based exit (illustrative):
- A close around ~896 would get them out if holding shares
- Framed as roughly ~2% downside risk from the entry (plus slippage)
Current Performance
- At narration time, the position is reported up ~ $179.
Methodology / Step-by-Step Framework
- Choose an earnings failure candidate
- Earnings outside the “hot season,” but with a specific remaining name (COST).
- Wait for analyst reaction to reveal the “true” narrative
- Look for analyst target downgrades / bearish interpretation of guidance, not just headline EPS/beat.
- Confirm with price action
- Prefer setups where price shows continued downside pressure into the open, then potential reversal/exhaustion, rather than a straight immediate rally while analysts turn bearish.
- Set tight risk parameters
- Example invalidation: close ~896 (framed as ~2% loss framework if trading shares).
- Use options to target fast mean reversion / crowding unwind
- Back spread selected due to expected payoff/volatility behavior.
- Exit quickly if momentum is missing
- Cut if price stops moving as expected soon, even if a formal stop hasn’t triggered.
Volatility / Options Rationale
- Volatility smile: described as “pretty flat” on COST
- The presenter argues this helps back spreads
- Why flat smile matters:
- Back spreads can be damaged when retail inflates out-of-the-money call prices
- Presenter claims that isn’t happening here because the smile is flat
- Implied volatility (IV):
- Presenter states IV is dropping after earnings (options become cheaper)
- Viewed as favorable for the structure
Supporting Examples Cited
- Nike
- Earnings failure trade that they exited after the first week because the trade “fizzled out” and price momentum reversed lower.
- HPE
- Currently in an earnings failure
- Described as becoming profitable within the first few days, with payoff continuing after consolidation.
Explicit Recommendations / Cautions
- The presenter cautions the strategy:
- Is not about being right more than wrong
- Will often be wrong more often
- But relies on tight risk control and quick exits
- Earnings failure trades must work quickly
- If price drifts without momentum, exit even if the thesis isn’t formally invalidated.
Disclosures / Disclaimers
- No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer is indicated in the provided subtitles.
Tickers / Assets / Indices Mentioned
- COST (Costco)
- S&P 500 (referenced as “S&P” / cash session)
- Examples: Nike, HPE (Hewlett Packard Enterprise)
Presenters / Sources
- No other presenters or third-party sources are named; this appears to be a single channel presenter speaking directly.
Rate this summary
Your feedback will help improve summaries.
Improve this summary
Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.
Translate summary in another language
Ask questions to this video
Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.