Video summary

USA and Global Politics Question Predictions 2026 - Edexcel A-Level Politics

Main summary

Key takeaways

Educational

Main ideas / lessons conveyed

  • The speaker (Ollie) shares Edexcel A-Level Politics Paper 3 predictions for 2026, focusing on topics that are more likely to appear based on what has not recently been examined.
  • Key warning: Do not only revise the predicted topics. Students must revise everything on the specification, because any topic can appear, including ones from last year.

  • Predictions are presented as “educated guesses/hunches”, not certainties.

  • Additional revision support is promoted:
    • An Easter revision webinar series (US politics and global politics; also UK politics and other topics).
    • Free mock papers on the “Politics Explained” website.
    • More Paper 3 resources are said to be available/coming soon (e.g., essay plans, revision notes, example packs, flashcards).

Methodology used for the predictions (as described)

The predictions identify topics/questions that:

  • Did not come up last year, or
  • Have not been asked recently (i.e., “never been asked” or “not been asked in a long time”).

These are then marked as extra priority areas.

The likely focus is given separately for:

  • 30-mark questions
    • Big topics
    • Smaller “tagged on”/related angles
  • 12-mark questions
    • Broad themes recurring
    • Smaller comparative/format topics
  • (For global politics) an “analyze 12 markers” type (likelihood/conflict angles).

Detailed list of predicted / high-priority topics and example question directions

A) USA Politics (Paper 3)

30-markers (main/high priority)

Two major (“big”) topics suggested as most important:

  • Democracy and participation

    • Example angles:
      • interest groups
      • party policy
      • campaign finance
      • presidential elections
    • Rationale: these didn’t come up last year (or haven’t much recently).
  • The presidency

    • Example angles:
      • relationship between Congress and the presidency
    • Rationale: asked last year only in that relationship, but not much in recent years; also framed as highly topical due to current events.

Smaller topics recommended as likely (often because they haven’t been asked as standalone 30-mark questions):

  • Party policy

    • Note: no 30-mark question “on its own” has really happened.
    • Example: evaluate whether Republican and Democrat parties have more in common than differences in policy
  • Constitutional amendment process

    • Example: evaluate whether the constitutional amendment process works effectively
  • Race and rights

    • Example: evaluate whether reforms to improve racial equality in the US have been effective
    • Rationale: not asked since 2021
  • Presidential elections and their significance

    • Example: evaluate whether incumbency determines presidential election results
    • Example: evaluate whether the US presidential election process requires reform
  • Foreign policy (explicitly combines presidency/Congress themes)

    • Example: evaluate the view that the president is able to dominate foreign policy
  • Formal vs informal sources of presidential powers

    • Example: evaluate whether the president’s formal powers are more important than informal powers

Note on exact wording: The speaker says the exact question wording is unlikely to match the predictions. The above are examples of what could be asked. They recommend practicing with mock papers.

12-markers

Likely “overall” topics:

  • Presidency
  • Democracy and participation
    • Rationale: both are said to be unlikely to have been tested last year, so they should be prepared.

Smaller comparative/structural topics suggested:

  • Comparing/contrasting elements across systems, such as:
    • party systems between countries
    • interest groups between countries
    • interest/power/influence of pressure groups in the UK and US
  • Specific “has never been asked” / “has never been asked in this format” type points:
    • House of Commons vs House of Representatives (never asked)
    • Extent of accountability of prime minister vs president to their legislatures (never asked)
    • Comparing party systems (never asked)
      • Example: differences/similarities between UK and US party systems

B) Global Politics (Paper 3)

30-markers (main/high priority)

Two big global topics not mentioned as coming up last year:

  • Political and economic global governance
  • State and globalization

Other big topics said to have come up recently and may reappear:

  • Human rights and environmental governance
  • Power and developments
  • Regionalism and the EU

Smaller/specific 30-mark possibilities (often linked to the above themes):

  • NATO and the United Nations

    • UN: “never been a question just on the UN”
    • NATO: “never been a question on NATO at all”
    • Examples:
      • evaluate whether global governance is ineffective
      • evaluate whether both NATO and the UN are ineffective and outdated
      • or a question focusing only on one of them
  • Effectiveness of non-state actors in tackling contemporary global issues

    • Framing: this angle is said to be “tagged onto the end” of topics, not always asked alone
    • Example: evaluate whether non-state actors are ineffective in tackling poverty/environment or other issues
  • Spread and development of liberal ideas

    • Example: evaluate the view that democracy and rule of law are in decline
  • State power classification

    • Example: evaluate whether China is now a superpower
    • Example: evaluate whether the US is no longer hegemonic
  • Sovereignty (likely to appear; could be embedded in multiple topics)

    • Example under globalization:
      • evaluate whether globalization has undermined sovereignty of states
    • Example under human rights:
      • evaluate whether human sovereignty is the main barrier to human rights protection
  • European Union

    • Said: not asked “in a while”
    • Example: evaluate whether the EU is a success for member states
    • Example: evaluate whether the EU is no longer a significant global actor
    • Example: evaluate whether it undermines sovereignty of member states

12-markers (global politics)

Topics said to have NOT come up last year (so prepare especially well):

  • Regionalism and the EU
  • State and globalization
  • Human rights and environmental global governance

Smaller topics suggested for strong preparation:

  • Polarity and the world order
    • Example: differences between multipolar vs unipolar world order
  • Spread of liberal ideas
  • Decline of democracy and rule of law
    • Example: examine ways democracy/rule of law have been in decline
  • Hard vs soft power
    • Example: differences between hard and soft power
    • Example: effectiveness of hard and soft power
  • Humanitarian interventions
    • Example: criticisms of humanitarian interventions and humanitarian/human rights courts
    • Example: examine differences in effectiveness
  • Theories of development
    • Example: differences between dependency theory and classical economic development theory
    • Note: described as potentially difficult; “never been asked”
  • Global civil society / non-state actors
    • Example: examine the role and significance of global civil society/non-state actors in tackling contemporary global issues

“Analyze 12 markers” (additional angle mentioned)

  • Globalization and likelihood of conflict
    • Example directions:
      • analyze divisions/differences around likelihood of conflict
      • differences between realist vs liberal ideas on globalization and their views on conflict

Resources / instructions emphasized (what viewers are encouraged to do)

  • Revise the full specification, not only predictions.
  • Use the free mock papers for practice:
    • Access: “first link in the description” on Politics Explained.
  • Use official/exam-support materials advertised:
    • Essay plans (including 12-marker and 30-marker plans), revision notes, example packs, flashcards—said to be up-to-date for the current exam cycle.
  • Attend or use recordings from:
    • Easter revision webinar series (details below).

Speakers / sources featured

  • Ollie — speaker; claims an A* in A-level Politics and runs/hosts the predictions video and webinar series.
  • Politics Explained — website referenced as the source for free mock papers and additional Paper 3 revision resources.
  • Edexcel A-Level Politics (Paper 3 exam structure) — framework used for the predictions (no other specific institution speaker named).
  • YouTube (comment section) — the speaker invites viewers to comment, but no additional speakers are present in the subtitles.

Original video