Video summary
USA and Global Politics Question Predictions 2026 - Edexcel A-Level Politics
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas / lessons conveyed
- The speaker (Ollie) shares Edexcel A-Level Politics Paper 3 predictions for 2026, focusing on topics that are more likely to appear based on what has not recently been examined.
-
Key warning: Do not only revise the predicted topics. Students must revise everything on the specification, because any topic can appear, including ones from last year.
-
Predictions are presented as “educated guesses/hunches”, not certainties.
- Additional revision support is promoted:
- An Easter revision webinar series (US politics and global politics; also UK politics and other topics).
- Free mock papers on the “Politics Explained” website.
- More Paper 3 resources are said to be available/coming soon (e.g., essay plans, revision notes, example packs, flashcards).
Methodology used for the predictions (as described)
The predictions identify topics/questions that:
- Did not come up last year, or
- Have not been asked recently (i.e., “never been asked” or “not been asked in a long time”).
These are then marked as extra priority areas.
The likely focus is given separately for:
- 30-mark questions
- Big topics
- Smaller “tagged on”/related angles
- 12-mark questions
- Broad themes recurring
- Smaller comparative/format topics
- (For global politics) an “analyze 12 markers” type (likelihood/conflict angles).
Detailed list of predicted / high-priority topics and example question directions
A) USA Politics (Paper 3)
30-markers (main/high priority)
Two major (“big”) topics suggested as most important:
-
Democracy and participation
- Example angles:
- interest groups
- party policy
- campaign finance
- presidential elections
- Rationale: these didn’t come up last year (or haven’t much recently).
- Example angles:
-
The presidency
- Example angles:
- relationship between Congress and the presidency
- Rationale: asked last year only in that relationship, but not much in recent years; also framed as highly topical due to current events.
- Example angles:
Smaller topics recommended as likely (often because they haven’t been asked as standalone 30-mark questions):
-
Party policy
- Note: no 30-mark question “on its own” has really happened.
- Example: evaluate whether Republican and Democrat parties have more in common than differences in policy
-
Constitutional amendment process
- Example: evaluate whether the constitutional amendment process works effectively
-
Race and rights
- Example: evaluate whether reforms to improve racial equality in the US have been effective
- Rationale: not asked since 2021
-
Presidential elections and their significance
- Example: evaluate whether incumbency determines presidential election results
- Example: evaluate whether the US presidential election process requires reform
-
Foreign policy (explicitly combines presidency/Congress themes)
- Example: evaluate the view that the president is able to dominate foreign policy
-
Formal vs informal sources of presidential powers
- Example: evaluate whether the president’s formal powers are more important than informal powers
Note on exact wording: The speaker says the exact question wording is unlikely to match the predictions. The above are examples of what could be asked. They recommend practicing with mock papers.
12-markers
Likely “overall” topics:
- Presidency
- Democracy and participation
- Rationale: both are said to be unlikely to have been tested last year, so they should be prepared.
Smaller comparative/structural topics suggested:
- Comparing/contrasting elements across systems, such as:
- party systems between countries
- interest groups between countries
- interest/power/influence of pressure groups in the UK and US
- Specific “has never been asked” / “has never been asked in this format” type points:
- House of Commons vs House of Representatives (never asked)
- Extent of accountability of prime minister vs president to their legislatures (never asked)
- Comparing party systems (never asked)
- Example: differences/similarities between UK and US party systems
B) Global Politics (Paper 3)
30-markers (main/high priority)
Two big global topics not mentioned as coming up last year:
- Political and economic global governance
- State and globalization
Other big topics said to have come up recently and may reappear:
- Human rights and environmental governance
- Power and developments
- Regionalism and the EU
Smaller/specific 30-mark possibilities (often linked to the above themes):
-
NATO and the United Nations
- UN: “never been a question just on the UN”
- NATO: “never been a question on NATO at all”
- Examples:
- evaluate whether global governance is ineffective
- evaluate whether both NATO and the UN are ineffective and outdated
- or a question focusing only on one of them
-
Effectiveness of non-state actors in tackling contemporary global issues
- Framing: this angle is said to be “tagged onto the end” of topics, not always asked alone
- Example: evaluate whether non-state actors are ineffective in tackling poverty/environment or other issues
-
Spread and development of liberal ideas
- Example: evaluate the view that democracy and rule of law are in decline
-
State power classification
- Example: evaluate whether China is now a superpower
- Example: evaluate whether the US is no longer hegemonic
-
Sovereignty (likely to appear; could be embedded in multiple topics)
- Example under globalization:
- evaluate whether globalization has undermined sovereignty of states
- Example under human rights:
- evaluate whether human sovereignty is the main barrier to human rights protection
- Example under globalization:
-
European Union
- Said: not asked “in a while”
- Example: evaluate whether the EU is a success for member states
- Example: evaluate whether the EU is no longer a significant global actor
- Example: evaluate whether it undermines sovereignty of member states
12-markers (global politics)
Topics said to have NOT come up last year (so prepare especially well):
- Regionalism and the EU
- State and globalization
- Human rights and environmental global governance
Smaller topics suggested for strong preparation:
- Polarity and the world order
- Example: differences between multipolar vs unipolar world order
- Spread of liberal ideas
- Decline of democracy and rule of law
- Example: examine ways democracy/rule of law have been in decline
- Hard vs soft power
- Example: differences between hard and soft power
- Example: effectiveness of hard and soft power
- Humanitarian interventions
- Example: criticisms of humanitarian interventions and humanitarian/human rights courts
- Example: examine differences in effectiveness
- Theories of development
- Example: differences between dependency theory and classical economic development theory
- Note: described as potentially difficult; “never been asked”
- Global civil society / non-state actors
- Example: examine the role and significance of global civil society/non-state actors in tackling contemporary global issues
“Analyze 12 markers” (additional angle mentioned)
- Globalization and likelihood of conflict
- Example directions:
- analyze divisions/differences around likelihood of conflict
- differences between realist vs liberal ideas on globalization and their views on conflict
- Example directions:
Resources / instructions emphasized (what viewers are encouraged to do)
- Revise the full specification, not only predictions.
- Use the free mock papers for practice:
- Access: “first link in the description” on Politics Explained.
- Use official/exam-support materials advertised:
- Essay plans (including 12-marker and 30-marker plans), revision notes, example packs, flashcards—said to be up-to-date for the current exam cycle.
- Attend or use recordings from:
- Easter revision webinar series (details below).
Speakers / sources featured
- Ollie — speaker; claims an A* in A-level Politics and runs/hosts the predictions video and webinar series.
- Politics Explained — website referenced as the source for free mock papers and additional Paper 3 revision resources.
- Edexcel A-Level Politics (Paper 3 exam structure) — framework used for the predictions (no other specific institution speaker named).
- YouTube (comment section) — the speaker invites viewers to comment, but no additional speakers are present in the subtitles.