Video summary

My Testimony about Prophet Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj // Bishop Robinson Fondong

Main summary

Key takeaways

News and Commentary

Overview

The speaker delivers a sermon explaining how the devil attacks Christians—particularly through online “severe campaigns” and slander against pastors and prophets. The message argues that believers should refuse the accuser’s role and instead follow biblical standards for truth and love.

1) An “incident” used to explain spiritual protection

The preacher recounts that after attending church, God instructed him to turn off a channel featuring a specific minister. He interprets this as protection rather than endorsement of what the minister was saying.

Later, when he mentioned that person’s name, he says God rebuked him—teaching that Christians should not participate in a “slander campaign.”

2) Core claim: attacks and accusations are Satan’s strategy

A central argument is that attacking pastors/men of God online (whether the attackers are correct or not) is Satanic work. The sermon frames this as the work of the “accuser of the brethren” (from Revelation 12:10), who targets believers to destroy them or neutralize their service—turning them into “normal” Christians with little impact.

The speaker extends the idea beyond individual believers:

  • Marriage triggers conflict, which the enemy uses to stop testimony about Jesus.
  • Children in Christian homes are intensely targeted, especially through schooling/college where professors may encourage doubt.
  • The enemy fights the soul, aiming at eventual destruction.

3) Biblical principle: accusations extend beyond “doing wrong”

The preacher argues that Satan’s accusations are not limited to sins committed. He claims Satan also accuses people for what they failed to do—including omissions such as refusing mercy or neglecting care, even when wrongdoing is not “obvious.”

He emphasizes that pointing fingers invites judgment and presents love as the antidote:

  • “Nothing done without love will survive.”
  • Believers must stand firm and act out of love, not in anger.

4) Online scandal/slander condemned as a “satanic system”

The sermon repeatedly asserts:

  • “Nothing sells like slander.”
  • Negative stories spread faster than good, feeding media and social platforms.
  • People who transmit accusations are “serving the devil” if the information fails biblical moral and edifying standards.

The speaker uses Philippians 4:8 as a filter: believers should only share what is true, noble, just, pure, lovely, good report, virtuous, and praiseworthy—and what edifies the church. If it does not meet this standard, it should not be transmitted.

5) Christians should not “attack people,” but oppose issues/doctrine

A key distinction is drawn:

  • Legitimate critique is acceptable when addressing doctrine or false teaching.
  • Attacking servants’ reputations, spreading videos/articles, or turning local issues into international controversies is framed as Satan’s divide-and-destroy method.

6) Examples and analogies supporting the anti-slander stance

The sermon reinforces its message with several stories and analogies:

  • “USA principle” (Uzzah touching the ark): trying to “help” by interfering with God’s work can result in judgment.
  • Paul vs. Peter: presented as a limited, local, issue-based confrontation; the speaker warns against turning similar matters into global public attacks.
  • Church history analogies: claims rival attacks among Christians contributed to the decline of church life in Northern Africa, setting the stage for later Islamic expansion.
  • Zambia story: told about church conflict where a bishop allegedly chose not to sue spiritual children in court, trusting God to defend the cause—offered as evidence that God handles justice.

7) Defense of Prophet Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj against “one-sided” accusations

The message shifts into a direct defense of Prophet Sadhu:

  • The speaker claims the attacks rely on misleading, one-sided information.
  • He asserts he has received communications and knows details that aren’t online.
  • He praises the prophet’s long-term accuracy (“longevity” ~ 50 years) and integrity, including returning honorariums back to ministry.
  • He cites personal testimonies of prophetic accuracy, including predicting the child “Anna” as a girl and naming her.

He also argues that prophetic words can require cooperation, time, or partial fulfillment—so calling someone a false prophet for apparent delays or partial mismatch is discouraged.

8) Call to prayer and “spiritual warfare” against accusations

The sermon concludes with prayer against:

  • “Every weapon of accusation,”
  • and a request that demonic slander collapse.

The speaker frames the moment as a call to join an “army” that proclaims truth while refusing to participate in an “accusing army.”

Presenters / Contributors Mentioned

  • Bishop Robinson Fondong (primary speaker/preacher)
  • Prophet Sadhu Sundar Selvaraj (defended/mentioned; not speaking in the subtitles)
  • Apostle Rome
  • Daddy Jack
  • Bishop Walker
  • Apostle Benny
  • Benin Dao
  • Renard Bonnke
  • David Wilkerson
  • Simulus (unclear identity due to subtitle errors)
  • Benny Hinn / Kenneth Haggin / Kim Clement / Billy Graham (names partially distorted in subtitles)
  • CNN / MSNBC (examples of scandal-driven media)
  • Stalin / Trotsky / Lenin (mentioned in analogy)
  • Uzzah (biblical figure used in analogy)
  • Moses / Miriam / Aaron (biblical figures used in the argument)

Original video