Video summary
OMEN Max 16 vs STRIX G16 (2025) - Asus ROG vs HP Omen Gaming Laptop (16")
Main summary
Key takeaways
Product reviewed / compared
- HP OMEN Max 16 vs ASUS ROG Strix G16 (2025) in the same roughly 16-inch class
- Focus areas:
- Gaming performance
- Build
- Display
- Thermals / noise
- Keyboard / trackpad
- Ports
- Battery
- Upgradeability
- Video note: Strix models this year come in:
- AMD (older design, reviewed here)
- A redesigned Intel-only version
- The review chooses AMD because it’s faster and cheaper.
Key features mentioned (by product)
ASUS ROG Strix G16 (AMD variant)
-
Build / materials
- Metal lid feels sturdy
- Plastic accents
- Fully plastic bottom feels cheaper
-
Rigidity
- Less keyboard flex than the OMEN (slightly)
-
Portability
- More comfortable to carry one-handed
- Premium feel is lower than OMEN, but overall handling/weight is better
-
Internals / spec limits
- Highest cited GPU limit for this AMD Strix model: up to RTX 570 Ti
- Higher GPUs require the redesigned models
-
Keyboard & input
- Full per-key RGB
- “Classic” RGB keyboard look
- Full-size arrow keys
- 5 reprogrammable macro keys
- Includes a numpad via a touch-based numpad on the trackpad (no physical numpad mentioned as primary)
-
Trackpad
- Glass trackpad
- Preferable click feel (compared against OMEN)
-
Display
- “Pretty okay” IPS panel (matte/matte-like behavior mentioned)
- 240 Hz
-
Sound
- Clearer, louder overall, but less bass punch than OMEN
-
Cooling / thermals / noise
- Runs cooler
- No thermal throttling in heavy games
- Fans are mostly silent at idle by default
HP OMEN Max 16
-
Build / materials
- Fully metal top and bottom
- More premium and more rigid overall
-
Display hardware
- Glass bezel
- More premium display framing
-
Internals / spec limits
- Configurable up to RTX 1590 (per video)
- Otherwise follows similar “best AMD vs best Intel” comparison
-
Portability tradeoff
- Feels heavier
- Not as comfortable one-handed as the Strix
-
Port selection
- “Almost identical” to Strix
- Extra ports on the back to reduce cable clutter
- Thunderbolt 4 on OMEN vs USB4 on Strix (minor difference stated)
-
Keyboard & input
- Full per-key RGB
- Unique design described like keys “float on water”
- Feels more clicky / pronounced
- Keys very close together (harder to find by touch initially; improves with acclimation)
- Half-size up/down keys
- Has a full-size numpad
-
Trackpad
- Likely plastic (vs Strix glass)
- Click feel described as satisfying on OMEN
-
Display
- Near-flawless 2.5K OLED, 240 Hz
- Claimed advantages vs IPS:
- Colors
- Contrast
- Blacks
- Coating behavior:
- OMEN is glossy (crisper, but more reflections)
- Strix is matte (less reflections, more glare)
-
Sound
- More bass and treble, but overall muffled
-
Microphone / webcam
- Microphone on Strix sounds better/less robotic
- Webcam differences:
- Strix looks softer
- OMEN looks sharper but more red
-
Cooling / thermals / noise
- Runs too hot in default conditions
- Thermal throttles hard in heavy games
- Cause described:
- OMEN allows higher power limits than cooling can safely handle
- Lowering power limits reduces temperatures but also reduces performance
- Default idle behavior:
- Fans almost always on, unlike Strix’s silent idle
Performance & gaming results (main comparison)
-
CPU comparison via benchmarks
- Cinebench
- Very close overall
- Strix AMD slightly faster in multi-core
- OMEN Intel slightly faster in single-core
- 3DMark Time Spy
- Basically identical scores because GPUs have identical power limits
- Cinebench
-
Real gaming performance (mixed CPU+GPU workloads)
- In every game tested, Strix outperformed by a little or matched closely
- Biggest gaps:
- CPU-intensive games like Rust and Counter-Strike
- OMEN described as an “absolute massacre”
-
Explanation given
- AMD benefits from 3D V-Cache in some games
- OMEN Intel uses more power, “stealing” power from GPU performance
- OMEN runs hot and thermal throttles, hurting heavy-game performance
-
Thermal / power setting note
- OMEN’s higher power limits can increase peak performance, but cooling isn’t bulky enough, causing throttling
- Reducing power limits helps temps somewhat, but performance drops
Battery life
- Strong consensus: don’t buy these for battery
-
Both “suck”
-
Light use test
- YouTube until death with:
- Full brightness
- 60 Hz
- Dedicated GPUs turned off
- Note: no exact watt-hours/runtime numbers provided in the provided subtitles
- YouTube until death with:
-
Gaming test
- Battlefield 1 until battery died using the same settings above
- Conclusion:
- Not suitable for gaming on battery
- Steam Deck / handheld PC recommended instead
Upgradeability (important downside for OMEN)
-
Both
- Two M.2 SSD slots
- Upgradeable Wi‑Fi card
-
OMEN’s major practical problem
- OMEN’s pre-installed drive sits under the vapor chamber
- OMEN’s Wi‑Fi card is also under the vapor chamber
- Upgrading requires removing the entire vapor chamber and repasting
- Inconvenient and not recommended repeatedly
User experience notes / ergonomics
-
Build & feel
- OMEN feels more premium (fully metal), but heavier
- Strix feels cheaper in some parts (plastic bottom), but is easier to carry
-
Keyboard feel
- OMEN is more clicky
- Strix is more classic
- OMEN usability tradeoff early on due to tightly spaced keys; adapts over time
-
Trackpad feel
- Strix: glass
- OMEN: likely plastic
-
Idle behavior
- OMEN fans run nearly constantly
- Strix stays silent at idle (defaults)
Pros / Cons (as expressed in the video)
ASUS ROG Strix G16 (AMD)
Pros
- Better or equal gaming FPS in tests; especially strong in CPU-heavy games
- Lower power usage → less heat
- Better thermals and less noise (silent idle)
- Cheaper overall (Strix “pretty much always” cheaper per the video’s value comments)
- Keyboard is classic and comfortable for typing
- Strix microphone sounds better
Cons
- Display is IPS and visibly worse vs OMEN OLED
- Build is less premium (plastic bottom)
- Touch-based numpad in trackpad isn’t as good as full physical keys (though can be turned off)
HP OMEN Max 16
Pros
- Premium build materials (fully metal)
- Outstanding OLED 2.5K display (best winner in the video)
- Full-size numpad
- More bass/treble presence in speakers (though muffled)
- Good connectivity and cable management (extra rear ports)
Cons
- Default thermals too hot → thermal throttling hard in heavy games
- Fans almost always on at idle
- Higher CPU power draw can hurt GPU performance
- Battery life poor (like Strix)
- Upgrade difficulty: vapor chamber removal + repaste required for SSD/Wi‑Fi upgrades
Numerical ratings / scores
- No explicit star rating or numeric review score is provided in the subtitles.
- Benchmark results are described qualitatively:
- Cinebench: close (multi-core favors Strix; single-core favors OMEN)
- 3DMark Time Spy: basically identical due to same GPU power limits
- Display specs mentioned numerically:
- 2.5K OLED (OMEN)
- 240 Hz on both
- 500 nits possible on both (as stated)
Overall verdict / recommendation (concise)
- Choose the ASUS ROG Strix G16 (AMD) if you want the best performance for gaming, especially CPU-heavy titles—because it runs cooler, is quieter, and wins in real-world game testing.
- Choose the HP OMEN Max 16 only if your top priority is a significantly better OLED 2.5K display, and you’re willing to accept worse thermals/fan behavior and more difficult upgrades.
Speaker contributions
- Single main narrator throughout; no distinct multiple reviewers indicated in the subtitles (music cues aside).