Video summary
A person who claims to be a former remote viewing trainee shares an unsettling story about
Main summary
Key takeaways
Overview
A storyteller claims to be a former trainee in a disciplined “remote viewing” program and submits an Antarctica experience as an allegedly true, entertainment-only spooky story. The host opens with a disclaimer, explains an Antarctic Treaty context, and notes that the submitter used a burner email and a fake name—so the episode is presented purely as narration, not evidence.
Main Plot / Key Events
Remote viewing training style
The trainee says the program was designed to avoid mysticism. Sessions reportedly followed strict protocols:
- Record raw sensory impressions first
- Discuss anything further only in controlled ways later
- Emphasis on boring practice
- Occasional, unsettling accuracy
The “whispered about” target
During the trainee’s 6th month, an exhausted debrief led by a senior instructor (“Mr. E”) included a story about a prior viewer who supposedly got an exceptionally anomalous result from random coordinates.
After that, the program allegedly began spot-checking similar coordinates. The trainee claims they also stopped assigning the target publicly, and when it did come up, they wouldn’t discuss results with viewers. The room reportedly went silent—one trainee immediately guessed it was Antarctica, described as “the place they would not discuss.”
Assigned coordinates (and first impressions)
Months later, the trainee receives coordinates and starts viewing without knowing the location.
Their notes reportedly begin with:
- Massive buried old metal
- Unnatural geometric corridors/angles extending deeper than expected
- Enormous sealed gates flush with the ground
- circular and rectangular
- like engineered doors that are not meant to reopen
- A limitless wall of ice stretching endlessly (compared to the Great Wall of China)
- with notes indicating a boundary beyond which they “can’t see”
The emotional “warning”
The most unsettling element isn’t the visuals—it’s the feeling:
Like standing somewhere they weren’t supposed to be.
They report feeling “eyes on me” and sensing a presence (or other viewers) in the space, even though they see no people.
Briefing reaction
Afterward, the trainee expects to be told they missed the target. Instead, the instructor asks only one question:
- “Did you perceive anything living?”
The trainee says no. The instructor appears relieved and files the notes away without a normal debrief.
Later attempts / aftermath
The trainee claims the program never assigned those coordinates again. They later research:
- Admiral Byrd
- Operation Highjump
- heat signatures
- subglacial structures
They acknowledge that much could be mythology and/or influenced by suggestion—but they still insist the “warning” impression never faded.
Why they share it years later
They say more declassified materials and cautious scientific acknowledgments of anomalies have made them uneasy. They also claim they’ve heard stories similar to their notes.
They end by emphasizing:
- No proof
- Only an unsettling lasting impression that “whatever is there is keeping a secret.”
Standout Tone, Highlights, and Reactions
- Heavy reliance on protocol realism (bored training, strict notes, accuracy checks) to intensify the creepiness.
- The single-question briefing (“Anything living?”) works like a punchline-style reveal—suggesting containment/danger mattered more than correctness.
- The climax centers on feeling watched, which becomes the core horror and overshadows the “gates” and structures.
People / Personalities Mentioned
- Host / narrator: The YouTube creator reading the submitted story (“Spooky Scary Storytime” host).
- Mr. E: A senior instructor (as named by the submitter).
- Admiral Byrd: Referenced later during the trainee’s research.