Video summary
Сколько должен получать DevOps в 2026? Реальные зарплаты, как просить повышение и не продешевить
Main summary
Key takeaways
Finance-focused summary (career-earnings “market” data, not investing)
This video analyzes IT salary “market pricing” (specifically for DevOps) using job-board benchmarks, then converts those benchmarks into a negotiation framework for requesting raises or new offers.
Instruments / tickers / assets
- None mentioned: no stocks, ETFs, bonds, commodities, or crypto.
- Mentions:
- FDS / FirstVDS (hosting provider for infrastructure)
- Job search website (source of salary statistics)
Key numbers (salary benchmarks, RUB)
Overall IT (all specialists)
- Median: 220,000 RUB
- Most common range: 108,000–315,000 RUB
DevOps / levels mentioned
The video references levels via captions that map roughly to: Leads / “Luts”, Seniors / “Senps”, Middle / “Midle”, “Medly” / “Medlow”, Juniors, interns, and genies (some category labels are unclear or inconsistent due to auto-captioning).
Leads / “Luts”
- Median: 367,000 RUB
- Range: 251–503,000 RUB
- Lower-limit reference: 368,000 RUB (used as a “monitor the market” threshold)
- Upper-limit reference: 560,000 RUB (used as “few offers above” threshold)
Seniors / “Senps”
- Median: 362,000 RUB
- Range: 299–447,000 RUB
- Employer logic (as stated):
- Top of range = “doing well”
- Bottom of range = “underpaid”
Middle / “Midle”
- Median: 227,000 RUB
- Range: 177–286,000 RUB
Junior / “Junas” / “Juniors”
- Example transfer:
- Median: 120,000 RUB
- Range: 70–170,000 RUB
- Example raise asks:
- Bold target: 170,000 RUB
- More cautious: 90,000 RUB
- “Average”: 120,000 RUB
Other categories mentioned (caption inconsistencies noted)
- “Medly” (appears like a “middle/low” level):
- Median: 177,000 RUB
- Range: 118,000–244,000 RUB
- “Medlov’s” salary:
- increased slightly by 20,000 RUB vs 2024
- “Genies”:
- Median: 94,000 RUB
- range line is confused (caption mismatch suspected)
- “Interns”:
- 41–94,000 RUB
- “Juniors”:
- “around 20,000 RUB” (context unclear)
Macro / timeline references
- Benchmarks are compared to the second half of 2024.
- Described as slightly increased for seniors and some mid-levels.
- No traditional macro drivers (CPI/interest rates/GDP/equities) are discussed—only labor-market timing.
Explicit negotiation framework (step-by-step method)
The presenter uses job-board distributions (median + lower/upper bounds) to decide what to ask and how to justify it.
-
Identify your level + the market’s median and range
- Use salary stats for the target role level (e.g., Leads, Seniors, Middle, Junior).
-
Decide your “comfortable” ask vs your “minimum acceptable”
- Comfortable = what you want.
- Minimum acceptable = the lowest you’ll still take.
-
Use your current salary to interpret your position vs the market
- Near the bottom of the range → you’re underpaid → ask for a raise.
- Near the top of the range → you’re doing well → likely only normal indexing.
- Around the median → ask for a small increase above market to strengthen your position.
-
Adjust upward based on your “value / indispensability”
- If you’re very valuable and replacement risk is high (“everything will fall apart”) → ask closer to the upper range.
- If you’re average → ask around the median (or slightly above, depending on your current pay).
-
When switching roles internally (e.g., support → pre-service/DevOps track)
- Use the relevant category’s range and set asks based on confidence:
- High-demand target = upper end (example: 170k)
- Conservative = mid-to-lower end (example: 90k)
- Average = median (example: 120k)
- Use the relevant category’s range and set asks based on confidence:
Key recommendations / cautions (as stated)
- Salary figures are treated as negotiation anchors (framed as “we need a date for various negotiations”).
- The presenter warns salary figures can create “false hope,” but still frames the data as a “market date” to guide negotiations.
- Recommendation:
- Don’t ask blindly—justify the raise and check whether you’re lowering the bar or staying aligned with market levels.
- Employer-side caution:
- They may pay based on price vs quality, candidate fit, and interview confidence.
- Expect HR questions.
Disclosures / disclaimers
- Subtitles include a “help the Financial channel” CTA and a sponsor mention (FDS / FirstVDS).
- No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer is present (and the content is not financial advice in the investment sense).
Presenter / sources
- Presenter: Anton Pavlenko
- Referenced sources/providers:
- A “well-known job search website” (salary statistics source; exact name not given in subtitles)
- FDS / FirstVDS (hosting provider; sponsor)
- Mentions a Telegram channel survey (link referenced in the description, details not specified)