BMW iX3 vs Mercedes GLC vs Volvo EX60 vs Xpeng G9 | The Winner Surprised Me | FULL IN-DEPTH REVIEW !

Product(s) Reviewed (4-car Comparison)

• BMW iX3 (50 xDrive)
• Volvo EX60
• Mercedes-Benz GLC (GLC 400 4MATIC)
• XPeng G9 (labeled a “joker” / unconventional pick in the segment)

The video is an in-depth, on-road group test focused on exterior, interior, tech/infotainment, specs, and driving/range/charging behavior (range/charging details are referenced, with a link to other tests).

---

Key Features Highlighted (Unique Points)

BMW iX3 (50 xDrive)

Charging / Range

• Largest usable battery: 108.7 kWh
• WLTP range: over 800 km (depending on wheels/config)
• Charging: 10–80% in 21 min at up to 400 kW

Design & Practicality

• Praised for BMW’s new design direction (“Neue Klasse”); looks “cool” vs prior BMWs.
• “Clean spec” comparison choice: white, 21-inch wheels, bright interior.

Interior & Tech

• Strong emphasis on driver ergonomics/seat fit: “excellent driving position”
• M Sport seats praised; steering wheel shape noted as unusual but quality is good.
• “Panorama Vision” display praised over projection HUDs:
  • Clear readability (not windshield-projected)
  • Less distraction than older projection systems
• Back seat:
  • Initially feels cramped, but reviewer says there’s enough legroom (180 cm test)
  • Middle seat narrower, but head/knee room acceptable

Driving

• Labeled most sporty/most enjoyable driving feel in the group.
• One-pedal recuperation: powerful and linear, stopping gently/predictably
• Steering: responsive/light; “driving/road connection” best among the cars.
• Noise: called noisiest (especially tire noise on Norway asphalt), but overall “not very loud.”

Notable Annoyances

• Recurring complaint about assistant/voice “cancel” behavior
• Some interface/controls friction

---

Mercedes-Benz GLC (GLC 400 4MATIC)

Charging / Range

• 94.0 kWh usable battery
• Charging: up to 330 kW
• 10–80% in 21–22 min

Design & Value/Pricing

• Looks best/most expensive even without AMG package and smaller wheels.
• Pricing described as highest:
  • Example test config: 935,000 CZK
• Mercedes configurator criticized as overly complicated.

Interior & Tech

• Called the most luxurious interior in the group (material quality, switches, open-pore wood options).
• Seats praised as the best:
  • “ergonomic, elastic, comfortable”
• Steering wheel experience:
  • Described as the only car with a traditional round steering wheel
• Infotainment:
  • Reviewer praises “Hyperscreen” (prefers it over “superscreen”)
  • Multimedia called among the most intuitive, easy-to-use, reliable
  • ADAS controls easy to toggle off (“tap the car icon” during range test)

Rear Seat / Space

• Feels spacious but not truly more than BMW
• Foot space more limited due to seat rails
• Rear overall comfort strong

Driving

• Best overall balance: “sportiness + responsiveness + feel + comfort”
• Recuperation sometimes stronger than Volvo (reviewer ranking comment).
• Steering feel acknowledged as very strong, including a better wheel than Volvo/BMW.

---

Volvo EX60

Charging / Range

• 91 kWh usable battery
• Up to 370 kW
• 10–80% in 16 min (called almost best among test cars)

Interior

• Reviewer likes atmosphere and material quality; very comfortable, roomy feel.
• Major complaint: interior design language criticized as overly busy/minivan-like:
  • Screen “glued on”
  • Square steering wheel vibe
  • Feels like it makes you “look up”
  • Discomfort with ergonomics (scroll wheel placement)
  • “Bowers & Wilkins” design element disliked here
• Driver displays:
  • Large display above steering wheel readable (not panoramic like BMW, but works)
• Infotainment:
  • Responsive interface, but occasional lag/slow responses
  • Disabling distraction alerts requires extra steps (deep menu scrolling)
• Back seat:
  • Called most spacious and “favorite back seat” for comfort/space/atmosphere
  • Extremely good knee/foot room; headroom good; width better than others
  • Middle seat less comfortable (backrest “tough”)

Driving

• Quietest overall, especially at 120 km/h (noted via power reserve test reference: “talk in a whisper”).
• Smoothest and easiest for smooth one-pedal driving.
• Adaptive air suspension standard:
  • Reduced swaying, excellent bump compliance
• However:
  • Feels less responsive/less fast than BMW/Mercedes even with strong specs
  • Wants more recuperation at low speeds
• Steering:
  • Pleasant but described as lacking feedback / artificial, especially at low speed (odd feel at speed extremes)

Priority Message

• Volvo portrayed as the pick for comfort + quiet + fast charging, but not the most emotionally exciting or responsive.

---

XPeng G9

Category Fit

• Reviewer frames it as a different class/size, not a direct same-class SUV competitor.
• Included as the closest Chinese alternative in the group.

Charging / Range

• Peak charging: up to 525 kW (fastest)
• 10–80% in 12 min (“crazy”)
• Battery: second largest among test cars
• WLTP range: 540 km (significantly shorter than the others)

Price / Availability

• Very competitive pricing:
  • 650,000 CZK fully equipped
  • Sold only in “complete sets”

Interior & Tech

• Design praised as distinctive (less copied than other XPeng models).
• Infotainment praised as one of the best in Chinese cars:
  • “cleanest, most intuitive, easiest to use”
  • No slowdowns/bugs reported
  • Customizable bottom panel; strong UI responsiveness
• Driver display:
  • Most “traditional” concept (limited info, assistants visualization, navigation placement)
• Criticism:
  • Trip computer reset behavior and limited ability to fully customize/disable certain UI elements
  • Passenger display can be distracting under some lighting

Driving

• Suspension comfort praised:
  • Air suspension standard, large travel, feels like a bigger SUV
• Main driving complaints:
  • One-pedal mode weak/non-linear and unpredictable
  • Hard to drive smoothly (small pedal travel + transition behavior)
  • Steering feedback unnatural/odd; heavy feel at low speed and odd centering at high speed
  • Acceleration felt slowest, despite paper power
• Rear seat:
  • Not more spacious than EX60 or iX3; comfort can be worse due to seating/lower setup

---

Comparisons Made (Explicit)

The reviewer compares BMW vs Mercedes vs Volvo vs XPeng on:

• Charging speed & battery size
• WLTP range (relative)
• Interior luxury/comfort/space
• Infotainment intuitiveness
• Driving feel (sportiness, steering feedback, one-pedal smoothness)
• Noise levels (BMW worst, Volvo best)

Also mentioned:

• XPeng G9 compared to Zeekr 7X: earlier direct comparison showed the G9 slightly better by a “narrow margin”
• Zeekr 7X fatigue from prior videos is referenced, and the reason it wasn’t chosen as the closer alternative is explained
• Mention of Zeekr 001 X (earlier comparison win margin)

---

Pros / Cons by Car (As Stated or Implied)

BMW iX3

Pros

• Best battery capacity and long WLTP range
• Strong real-world behavior (via linked range/power-reserve tests)
• Sportiest driving feel; linear predictable one-pedal
• Excellent driver ergonomics and fit
• Panorama Vision display praised

Cons

• Noisiest of the group (road/tire noise)
• Usability irritations (assistant “cancel” issue)
• Steering wheel not considered best in group

---

Mercedes GLC

Pros

• Most luxurious interior and best seat comfort
• Best overall infotainment intuitiveness/reliability
• Strong driving balance; steering and recuperation praised
• Practicality: largest/strong front trunk (described as huge)

Cons

• Most expensive; Mercedes configurator complexity criticized
• Rear may feel less spacious than expected due to foot space constraints

---

Volvo EX60

Pros

• Extremely quiet and comfortable
• Smoothest single-pedal driving
• Fast charging: 10–80% in 16 min
• Best rear-seat space/comfort; “favorite back seat”
• Adaptive air suspension praised for bump compliance

Cons

• Interior design criticized as overly busy/minivan-like
• Infotainment may lag; disabling alerts requires extra steps
• Steering feedback described as artificial/lacking
• Less responsive acceleration than BMW/Mercedes

---

XPeng G9

Pros

• Best charging speed: 10–80% in 12 min and up to 525 kW
• Strong value: 650k CZK fully equipped
• Infotainment among best Chinese systems: intuitive, customizable, fast
• Comfortable ride feel with air suspension

Cons

• One-pedal mode and throttle/recuperation calibration criticized as weak/non-linear and hard to modulate
• Steering feel criticized as unnatural/blurry/heavy depending on speed
• Despite power numbers, felt slowest in practice
• WLTP range much shorter (540 km)
• UI limitations (trip reset behavior; screen not easily dismissible)

---

Overall Recommendations / Verdict (Reviewer’s Final Picks)

The reviewer doesn’t claim a single “objective best,” but gives clear personal recommendations:

1. Choose BMW iX3 if you want longest range + sporty driving + fast charging without overpaying.

   • Claimed hardest to beat for long-range, with real-world performance winner claims (via linked test).

2. Choose Volvo EX60 if you want quiet comfort + fast charging and don’t require BMW-level range.

   • Praised for comfort/quiet and 10–80% in 16 minutes.

3. Choose Mercedes GLC for luxury/emotions and the best overall experience if budget allows.

   • Reviewer leans toward it personally despite price/config complexity.

4. Choose XPeng G9 for charging speed + features/value, but not for the smoothest one-pedal driving.

   • Favorite among Chinese cars; tech/value strong, but driving calibration/smoothness is a dealbreaker.

Final Verdict Sentence (Closest Summary of the Reviewer)

• Buy BMW iX3 for long-range + charging + sporty driving; buy Mercedes GLC for luxury/emotions and best overall blend; buy Volvo EX60 for quiet comfort + smoothness + fast charging; consider XPeng G9 mainly for value and charging speed despite weaker driving smoothness and shorter WLTP range.

---

Ratings / Numerical Scores

• No star ratings are provided.
• Key numeric figures included:
  • iX3 battery: 108.7 kWh usable; WLTP >800 km
  • iX3 charging: 10–80% in 21 min at up to 400 kW
  • GLC usable battery: 94.0 kWh; up to 330 kW; 21–22 min
  • EX60 usable battery: 91 kWh; up to 370 kW; 10–80% in 16 min
  • G9 pricing: 650,000 CZK fully equipped; WLTP 540 km
  • G9 charging: up to 525 kW; 10–80% in 12 min

(Trunk sizes/towing were also mentioned for each car, but only the standout claims were not fully re-listed here; e.g., Mercedes front trunk up to 128 L and towing up to 2.4 tons.)

---

Speakers / Different Views

• Single main reviewer provides most commentary and comparisons.
• Production/camera credits (e.g., Philip behind the camera) are mentioned, but no distinct additional named speakers are given.
• Multiple references to “testers” occur during the group test, but they are not treated as separate, named reviewers.