Video summary
Datathon 2026: Introduction & Problem Statements Explainer Session.
Main summary
Key takeaways
Business-focused summary (Datathon 2026: intro + problem statement explainer)
Event purpose & commercialization intent
- Datathon 2026 (KSP crime-data use cases) is positioned as more than a “tech-for-tech’s-sake” hackathon.
- Shortlisted solutions are intended to be taken into production deployment.
- The stated business outcome is to drastically reduce investigation time across the lifecycle (from FIR lodging through offender jail/closure) using AI + analytics.
Target users
- Primary end users are police/investigators and senior officers (not citizens).
- Use cases emphasize operational usability:
- fast queries
- multilingual support
- natural language interfaces
- Outputs should be decision-ready dashboards for command centers.
Two problem statements (what teams must build)
Problem Statement 1: Intelligent conversational AI for KSP crime database
Core objective
Build an agentic conversational AI (chatbot-style, potentially voice-enabled) that supports multilingual querying (English + Kannada). Investigators should query the crime database using NLP rather than manual SQL.
Key expected capabilities
- Crime pattern discovery
- Criminal network analysis
- Socio-demographic crime insights
- Criminology profiling
- Proactive crime prevention and intelligence
- Contextual, multi-step investigation (clarified in Q&A)
- Not “simple Q&A”; the agent should help connect an offender to other related cases.
Implementation/data expectations
- Raw data will not be provided due to sensitivity/privacy.
- Participants receive:
- schema/master table structure
- “header files” to generate synthetic data for prototyping.
- LLM guidance:
- LLMs are allowed as long as they run on Zoho Catalyst.
- Guidance cautions against building/training LLMs from scratch (costly/complex).
Problem Statement 2: State-of-the-art data visualization & AI-driven analytics for crime investigations
Core objective
Transform state crime records-board data (currently in data silos and often handled via manual workflows) into proactive, AI-enabled state-level crime intelligence hubs.
Key expected capabilities
- Advanced visualizations with drill-down
- Emerging state analysis
- Criminology network + link analysis
- Sociology-focused AI-driven predictive dashboards
Operational emphasis (command/response use)
- Dashboards should offer real-time/near-real-time situational snapshots to enable:
- faster response
- optimal resource allocation
- Mentions latency/operational constraints considerations.
Tooling/approach guidance
- They explicitly mention using PowerBI internally/early-stage.
- Teams are encouraged to go beyond “just BI”—i.e., add advanced algorithms and research-backed statistics.
Frameworks / playbooks / processes mentioned (execution mechanics)
Prototype development & deployment playbook (Catalyst-centric)
- Solutions must be deployed on Zoho Catalyst (mandatory).
- If using Catalyst services, teams should prefer them (examples given):
- serverless functions
- docker/app services
- QuickML
- If not using Catalyst services, open-source tooling is allowed, but deployment must still be on Catalyst.
Submission process (repeatable)
Teams can submit multiple times before deadlines via the participant dashboard:
- Select one challenge and solve its key aspects (avoid splitting effort across both).
- Provide:
- Prototype brief (using a provided submission template)
- Public GitHub repository
- Public demo video link
- Prototype deck upload
- Deployed solution link (on Catalyst)
Selection/shortlisting principles (quality bar)
Repeated emphasis:
- Don’t build “quick and dirty.”
- Evaluation will be by senior officers/domain experts.
- Solutions should demonstrate:
- production-grade potential
- scalability (capacity planning; failure under user scale is a negative)
- security
- maintainability for long-term (~a decade) operation
Concrete operational KPIs / measurable success criteria (implied targets)
No numeric KPIs were stated, but “good” was described as:
- Investigation time reduction (end-to-end speed from FIR to offender jail)
- Query latency / efficient data pipelines for near-real-time responses
- For dashboards:
- a snapshot including trends/accuracy so officers can act quickly
- Evaluation parameters will be posted (announced they will appear in the resource tab within days once decided).
Key timelines & milestones (dates)
- June 11: Workshop “Introduction to Catalyst by Zoho” (critical to attend)
- June 19: Last day to register
- June 18: Another Catalyst workshop (recommended)
- June 26: Workshop/prototyping milestone appears in the timeline description
- July 28: Submissions due / “take the submissions live”
- After submission: shortlisting → prototype refinement → in-person demo day grand finale
- (Exact demo day date not provided in the subtitles.)
Data access, privacy, and constraints (major risk mitigations)
- Raw/real data won’t be shared; participants must work with:
- anonymized context
- synthetic data
- Use of master table structure / schema
- Dataset will be posted in the Resource tab once ready.
- Data/test data will not contain real PII; “PII/DPP act wouldn’t arise” per Q&A.
Example scenarios and domains mentioned (business realism)
- Networked/cyber crimes:
- cyber/cryptocurrency
- dark web
- cross-bank/international money flows
- Chain-link intelligence:
- connecting an offender to other crimes/cases to reduce time wasted on manual cross-referencing
- Command-center style use:
- officers watching “live” crime dashboards for fast situational awareness
Sources / presenters (as named in the subtitles)
- Dr. Pranam Mati (Director General of Police, Police Computer Wing, Internal Security Division, Police Computer Wing & Criminal Investigation Department)
- Shri Pisha Kumar (Deputy Inspector General of Police, State Crime Report Bureau, Bengaluru)
- Rajiv Dash Sharma (Solution Architect, AI / Cloud Computing / Cyber Security)
- Arjit (industry practice leader, Analytics & AI; full name not fully captured)
- Dr. Monty (source/vision/closing; last name not fully captured)
- Zoho / Catalyst representatives (developer relations / senior developer relations; individual name not captured)
- Domain experts referenced but not fully named (e.g., Mahesh, Ranganat Sar, plus others)