Video summary

We Backtested Triple RSI on 5 Stocks for 10 Years

Main summary

Key takeaways

Finance

Assets / Tickers Mentioned

  • AAPL (Apple)
  • AMZN (Amazon)
  • TSLA (Tesla)
  • NVDA (Nvidia)
  • AMD (Advanced Micro Devices)

Strategy / Methodology (Triple RSI Mean Reversion)

Backtest Window

  • Sep 2016 to Sep 2026 (10 years)
  • Apply the exact same rules and parameters to each stock.

Entry Condition (Buy on Close)

Enter a long position when:

  • RSI(5) is below 30 and falling for 3 consecutive sessions
  • Three sessions prior: RSI must have been below 60
  • At that earlier point, price remained above the 200-day moving average

Exit Condition (Sell on Close)

  • Sell when RSI rises above 50

Risk Controls / Structure

  • No stop loss
  • No profit target
  • No optimization/tuning after seeing results (“no special settings or optimizations after receiving the results”)

Key Performance Results (By Stock)

Test Size & Profitability

  • Apple (AAPL)

    • 27 deals
    • ~82% profitable
    • Avg trade result: +0.90%
    • Profitability factor: 2.17
  • Amazon (AMZN)

    • 25 deals
    • ~72% profitable
    • Avg trade result: (described as weaker; profitability factor listed)
    • Profitability factor: 1.70
  • Tesla (TSLA)

    • 55% profitable
    • Avg trade result: −0.80%
    • Profitability factor: 0.83 (below 1 ⇒ unprofitable overall under these rules)
    • Explicit conclusion: Strategy worked for AAPL/AMZN but was unprofitable for TSLA
  • Nvidia (NVDA)

    • 26 deals
    • 24 profitable
    • Success rate: 92.3%
    • Avg profit per trade: +3.82%
    • Profitability factor: 19.24
  • AMD

    • 33 trades
    • Avg profit per trade: +4.65%
    • Profitability factor: 22.29

Cross-Stock Comparison (Average Profit per Deal)

  • AMD: +4.65%
  • NVDA: +3.82%
  • AAPL: +0.90%
  • AMZN: +0.80%
  • TSLA: −0.80%

Explicit Takeaways / Cautions

  • Rule transfer risk: A strategy’s success on one stock does not guarantee similar results on another.
  • Sector/bias hypothesis: The strongest results were AMD and NVDA (semiconductors). The speaker questions whether this reflects a historical sector bias or merely a “lucky” 10-year sample.
  • Small-sample caution: Extremely high metrics (e.g., NVDA/AMD profitability factors) may be sensitive to sample size.
  • Why backtest rather than assume:

    “That’s why we test, not assume.”

  • Notable risk feature: No stop-loss / no profit target means outcomes depend entirely on the RSI exit rule.

Disclosures / Disclaimers

  • No explicit “not financial advice” disclaimer appears in the provided subtitles.

Presenters / Sources

  • No presenter name or external source is explicitly identified in the subtitles.
  • Only a mention of a creator’s community/site: “School” and “Link below.”

Rate this summary

Your feedback will help improve summaries.

Improve this summary

Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.

Pro

Translate summary in another language

Pro

Ask questions to this video

Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.

Coming soon

Share this summary

Original video