Video summary
Lesson 21: Te oku/te aru: how to REALLY understand them. What they never teach!
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas and lessons
- The lesson explains the deeper, less-obvious logic behind Japanese te-form constructions, focusing on te aru and te oku, and how they often don’t map cleanly to English.
- The speaker emphasizes a core learning approach:
- Don’t rely on simplistic English equivalents.
- Instead, understand what Japanese is literally doing structurally—even if that requires “weird” translations that reflect Japanese logic.
Key grammar concepts illustrated
1) te-form + aru (and how it differs from te-form + iru)
In the sentence about Alice’s jar:
- sono bin-ni-wa raberu-ga hatte atte
The speaker identifies three uses involving te-form in that sentence:
- hatte aru: “a label was pasted on (it)” / “exists in a state of having had a label pasted onto it”
Core explanation
- te-form + iru
- Typically understood as being in a state of doing/being—often where an English “is doing / is in a state of” fits.
- te-form + aru
- Also indicates being in a state resulting from an action, but it tends to carry the nuance of:
- existence in the result-state of an action that is treated as having been done by (someone/another agent).
- Also indicates being in a state resulting from an action, but it tends to carry the nuance of:
Comparison example: window
- mado-ga aite iru (“The window is open”)
- aite iru uses the self-move verb form (a state), treated like “the window is open” as a state of openness.
- mado-ga akete aru (“The window is open” with extra implication)
- akete aru signals that the window is open because somebody opened it.
Animacy / “volition” reasoning (important lesson)
- aite iru
- Treats even an inanimate object (like a window) in an “honorary animate” way:
- i.e., “the window is open (as its own state).”
- Treats even an inanimate object (like a window) in an “honorary animate” way:
- akete aru
- Strips that honorary animacy:
- the window becomes a mere object that “exists in a state of having been opened by someone else.”
- Strips that honorary animacy:
Structural takeaway
- Even though the other-move verb suggests someone acted, the subject marked by -ga is still the window—the thing “in a state of having been opened.”
- Same logic applies to Alice’s jar:
- raberu-ga hatte atte
- Roughly: “label existed in a state of having been pasted onto it”
- English has no clean equivalent, so the Japanese logic must be learned directly.
2) Quoting written text on an object: -to + kaite aru
In Alice’s label description:
- ‘orenji maamareedo’-to kaite atta
Explanation:
- -to functions as the quotation particle: it marks exactly what the label says.
- kaite aru / kaite atta
- indicates that those words were written onto it—the result state of writing by someone else.
Key point:
- Japanese doesn’t frame it as “the label said…” (as if the label is a speaking agent).
- Instead, it frames it as an object bearing written content created by someone else.
3) Introducing -te oku: “placing an action/result in position”
The speaker notes that textbooks often leave -te oku undefined, especially for advanced students.
In the story, Alice puts the empty jar away:
- Umaku todana-no hitotsu-he toorisugari-ni oite oita
Analysis of the unusual ending
There are two forms related to oku:
- oite oita
Both are rooted in:
- oku = “to put/place.”
Core meaning of te-form + oku
The speaker argues the central meaning is:
- “place the action in position”
- so the resulting state/effect remains “in place” afterward.
How it connects to te-form + aru (“two halves of the same coin”)
Example pair:
- mado-ga akete aru
- The window stands open because someone put it in that state (from the window’s viewpoint).
- mado-wo akete oku
- Open the window and put that opening into place so it will remain open for the future.
Why “do in advance / do for a purpose” is only partial
- Textbooks often translate -te oku as “do in advance / do for a purpose.”
- The speaker’s correction:
- That’s sometimes the nearest English approximation,
- but the real underlying meaning is setting up / placing the action (and its results) so they stay effective.
Story-specific implication
- Alice isn’t doing something “in advance for a purpose” in the typical textbook sense.
- She’s solving a practical problem by storing the jar safely so it won’t harm people below—still consistent with “place the result in effect.”
Additional examples beyond “advance/purpose”
- tojikomite oku
- “It’s cruel to lock a small child in her room.”
- The speaker insists -te oku means:
- do the action and leave its effects/results in place
- not “do it for a purpose” in an abstract way
- nakasete oku
- “It’s all right to leave a baby to cry sometimes.”
- Here, -te oku similarly means:
- do the action (allow/leave crying) and leave the result in effect
- not “advance” and not necessarily a special plan/purpose
Sources / speakers
- Speaker/Host: The lesson instructor (unnamed in the subtitles).
- Characters referenced: Alice (from Alice’s Adventures / Wonderland context).
- Communities/resources referenced (not direct speakers): “regular textbooks,” “Japanese learning websites,” “newspapers” (mentioned as background context).