Coki Pardede jadi Dosen Public Speaking | The Trial

Main Ideas and Lessons (Public Speaking Focus)

• Public speaking is both an art and a science

  • It involves conveying a message to the public, but the method depends on the speaker’s goals.
  • Public speaking can aim to:
    • Provide information
    • Entertain
    • Persuade / sell
    • Or simply “chat/communicate”
  • Therefore, “good public speaking” is goal-dependent—start by clarifying your purpose.

• Start by diagnosing the real blocker: nervousness (and internal thinking)

  • Nervousness is described as common when speaking to important/superior audiences (e.g., judges, directors/rectors, people with higher social status).
  • Nervousness isn’t inherently bad; to some extent it can mean you recognize the importance of what you’re about to do.
  • The problem is nervousness that causes incoherence—jumping points, wrong diction, messy delivery.

• Manage nervousness so it becomes an advantage

  • Key belief: you can’t completely remove nervousness; you must control it.
  • Reduce nervousness through preparation, including:
    • Thoroughly preparing your materials
    • Verifying sources and reliability
    • Ensuring your points are logically valid
    • Practicing delivery (e.g., practicing in front of a mirror)
  • Avoid “easy mode”
    • If you only prepare when you “feel confident,” or you try to remove nerves completely, preparation may become less serious—leading to worse performance.
  • Shift mindset during delivery
    • When presenting to important people, treat their presence as evidence they came to listen.
    • Reframe fear of judgment as an assumption that may not be true.
    • Use that mindset to reduce internal “enemy thoughts” like: “What if I say something wrong?”

• Audience engagement matters, not just content

  • In the “information age,” audiences can find information anywhere, so your speech must add:
    • Uniqueness
    • How to make information interesting
  • Monitor signs of disengagement (e.g., playing with a pen, unclear eyes/gaze, body language).
  • Use icebreakers or engagement techniques to keep the presentation clear and stimulating.

• Substance vs. delivery: both matter, but delivery is often judged alongside substance

  • Judges/assessments are portrayed as looking for:
    • Substance (what’s true/meaningful)
    • Delivery (how it’s communicated)
  • Warning: answering only with substance (without communicating effectively) can be seen as failing the full criteria.
  • In competitions (non-scientific contexts), the talk is treated like a communication contest—mistakes happen, and what matters is how well the message travels to the audience.

• Hook design: make it engaging, but don’t let it overpower the content

  • A hook is necessary to draw attention, especially in the first 1–2 minutes.
  • But it must not be stronger than the material, or the speaker becomes burdened and the message delivery suffers.

• Main purpose: convey information clearly (avoid distracting “smartness”)

  • The core idea: many people get stuck not due to technical skill, but because they lose sight of the main goal.
  • Overemphasis on being “cool/smart/educated” can block the goal of getting the information across.
  • Advice:
    • Avoid complicated words if they prevent understanding
    • Use quotes only when relevant (otherwise they waste time)
  • “Diction acrobatics” is treated as secondary:
    • It should support clarity and understanding, not become a performance.

• Failure and endgame mindset

  • Participants are encouraged to:
    • Pursue their dreams even if they might fail
    • View the 20s as a period for trying, learning, and failing safely (failure shouldn’t stop innovation)
    • Accept that time is a constraint later in life—start now while you have energy and time

---

Methodology / Instructions Presented

A) Before speaking: clarify purpose

• Identify your goal for communicating:
  • persuade/sell
  • provide information
  • entertain
  • or just chat/communicate
• Plan your speaking style based on that goal.

B) Managing nervousness (step-by-step)

• Accept nervousness as normal
  • Treat it as a sign the topic matters.
• Use preparation to reduce harmful nervousness
  • Cross-check reliability of sources
  • Ensure points are logically valid
• Practice delivery
  • Practice speaking in front of a mirror
  • Know your points so you don’t freeze on stage
• Avoid relying on “confidence by absence of nerves”
  • Don’t treat “being not nervous” as the goal; keep preparation consistent.
• Control internal assumptions
  • Remind yourself the audience/judge/important person is there and willing to listen
  • Reframe “judgment fear” as an assumption that may be false
• Plan for engagement early
  • Make the first 1–2 minutes engaging (use a hook/icebreaker)

C) Make the information relevant and engaging

• Start with relevance (don’t begin with overly technical terms or irrelevant facts).
• Build a logical bridge so the audience feels why the info matters to them.
• Monitor audience engagement during the talk:
  • if attention drops, adjust with icebreakers and clearer transitions.

D) Content and delivery balance

• Ensure both:
  • Substance: accurate/meaningful points (especially in truth-sensitive contexts)
  • Delivery: clarity, responsibility in communication, and engagement
• Avoid “technique without impact”:
  • The best technique is useless if you keep giving in to distracting assumptions.
• In competitions/assessment contexts (as portrayed):
  • Judges often look at how you convey what you believe is true.

E) Language and vocabulary guidance

• Prefer clarity over showing off.
• Avoid “diction acrobatics” when it blocks understanding.
• Don’t overuse quotes—use them only if relevant and supportive.
• Keep vocabulary straightforward enough that the listener receives the message.

---

Speakers / Sources Featured (As Visible in the Subtitles)

• Coki Pardede (main speaker/host, discussed as “Bang Coki / Coki”)
• Audience participants / students (unnamed speakers who ask questions and share end goals)
  • Includes multiple brief questioners and at least one speaker discussing an endgame in history/media; others mention goals like content creation, journalism, law/DPR, fintech startup, missionary/content creation, etc.
• GPT / ChatGPT (mentioned as a tool/comparison; not a direct speaker)
• Referenced public figures (mentioned in passing as examples):
  • Soekarno (Bung Karno)
  • Feri Irwandi
  • Tanaka (name mentioned as an example)
• Referenced historical/cultural works/terms (not speakers):
  • GPT chat, Wikipedia
  • “Squid Game”
  • “Game of Thrones”
  • Various history examples (e.g., Dutch, Japanese warring lords, Crusades, Soviet Union collapse, Ken Arok, etc.)