เทียบรุ่น Honda CR-V e:HEV RS vs Nissan X-Trail e-POWER คันไหนเจ๋งกว่ากัน

Product(s) Reviewed / Compared

• Honda CR‑V e:HEV RS (4WD) vs Nissan X‑Trail e‑POWER (e‑Power) EFCE 4WD (referred to as “Excel/XEL” in subtitles)

---

Key Unique Points Mentioned (Features & Specs)

Nissan X‑Trail e‑POWER EFCE 4WD (Newest)

Price / Value

• Introductory price: 1,699,000 baht
• About 30,000 baht cheaper than the Honda CR‑V e:HEV RS

Exterior / Lighting

• New front grille and updated “new logo” styling
• LED headlights, with DRL above the headlights
• 19-inch two-tone rims (235/55 R19)
• 4-wheel disc brakes
• 360-degree camera
• Panoramic sunroof (top-opening, two-tone black/gray described)
• Electric tailgate
• Rear: LED tail lights

Powertrain / Drivetrain (e‑POWER Concept)

• 1.5L 3‑cyl gasoline engine mainly functions as a generator (engine spins/pumps; motors handle propulsion)

• Motors provide drive: front + rear motors = 4WD

• Output mentioned: 213 hp

• Torque mentioned: 525 Nm (later also referenced as around 500 Nm in the driving section)

• Hybrid behavior: can run in EV mode for a while if the battery is sufficiently charged

Interior / Comfort / Tech

• Leather materials; “luxury” feel with a two-tone cabin (brown/black front)
• Bose speakers
• Two-tone console with wood trim
• Digital full display + Head-Up Display (HUD)
• Multi-function steering wheel; electrically adjustable seats
• Convenience/charging:
  • Wireless charging
  • USB Type A & Type C
• ECVT transmission with E-paddle
• Driving modes listed:
  • Offroad, Snow, Auto, Eco
  • Plus Sport and Downhill Assist
• Rear seats: spacious, reclining/flexible; rear AC
• Rear charging ports with indicator lights
• Safety/ADAS mentioned:
  • Adaptive cruise control
  • Lane keeping assist
  • Lane changing assist
• Included 360-degree camera for parking/visibility

Driving Feel (Test Drive Impressions)

• Acceleration: described as faster/quicker than CR‑V in testing
• Handling: corners well; described as stable
• Criticisms:
  • Steering wheel feels too light (vs CR‑V)
  • Ride/feedback described as more floaty, rougher, less refined, less seamless
  • Suspension feel described as more “gentle operation” vs CR‑V’s firmer approach

Performance Numbers

• 0–100 km/h: 7.41 seconds (reported)

---

Honda CR‑V e:HEV RS (4WD)

Price / Value

• Price: 1,729,000 baht
• About 30,000 baht more expensive than Nissan

Engine / Motors / Outputs

• Hybrid system: 2.0L R e‑Hybrid (as described)
• Two motors
• Output: 207 hp
• Torque: 335 Nm (approx.)
• Fuel economy: both cited as similar (~19.6–19.5 km/l range)
• EV capability:
  • EV mode possible if the battery is fully charged
  • Max EV speed around 120 km/h

Exterior / Lighting / Styling

• Sportier “RS” look:
  • New grille
  • Full RS body kit
  • RS styling described as more sporty than Nissan’s more luxurious look
• Wheels: 19-inch same size (235/55 R19); black with a shiny line
• 4-wheel disc brakes
• 360-degree camera
• Rear: all LED lights with Honda design pattern
• RS features noted:
  • Rear wiper
  • Electric tailgate (also implied electric features similar to Nissan)

Interior / Comfort / Tech

• Two-tone interior (black + gray) with an “aggressive/fierce/edgy” theme
• Bose speakers (also repeated as included)
• Clear/digital screen; HUD included
• Wireless charger; USB Type C + 12V outlet
• Automatic parking brake
• Driving modes: Sport, Normal, Econ
• Rear seat comfort: more adjustable and reclining levels (described as more comfortable vs Nissan)
• ADAS/safety mentioned:
  • Active Cruise Control
  • Collision warnings
  • Lane-related supports described more generally

Driving Feel (Test Drive Impressions)

• Suspension tuned to be firm/tight for fun driving in RS
• In tests: smoother/subtle body control; absorbs vibration well
• Comparison feedback:
  • Feels more solid and firm
  • Steering wheel has better weight
  • Perceived as less jarring and smoother than Nissan
• Mode behavior:
  • Switching modes changes suspension behavior
  • In Sport mode: firmer suspension + heavier steering

Performance Numbers

• 0–100 km/h: subtitles show 10.88 seconds (appears to be a different timing/segment or possible auto-captions misread; it’s the only CR‑V number explicitly shown)

---

Pros / Cons Mentioned (From the Video)

Nissan X‑Trail e‑POWER EFCE 4WD

Pros

• Lower price (~30k cheaper)
• Strong acceleration (faster than CR‑V in test drive)
• High torque figures for a strong “pull” feel
• Comfortable, smooth suspension (often praised)
• Rich equipment: 360 camera, Bose, HUD, electric tailgate, ADAS, multiple driving modes

Cons

• Steering wheel lighter than CR‑V (less confidence)
• Ride described as more floaty and less refined/seamless
• Some rougher/less convincing feedback compared with CR‑V

---

Honda CR‑V e:HEV RS

Pros

• More solid/firm feel in steering and suspension feedback
• Steering wheel better weight
• Confident cornering; suspension described as smooth and well-tuned
• RS package: sport look + firmer settings
• Safety emphasized (including collision warning) and broader ADAS suite
• Fuel economy described as similar to Nissan (~19.5–19.6 km/l)
• Rear seat comfort highlighted (more reclining/adjustment)

Cons

• Higher price (~30k more)
• EV-mode usage depends on battery being fully charged (limitation mentioned for both cars)
• Torque figure lower than Nissan’s e‑POWER claims in the in-video discussion

---

Comparisons Made (Direct Conclusions)

• Price: Nissan is ~30,000 baht cheaper
• Acceleration: Nissan e‑POWER described as faster
• Handling Feel:
  • Both corner well, but:
    • CR‑V feels firmer/more solid, with heavier steering weight
    • X‑Trail feels floaty/less refined, with lighter steering
• Comfort & Character:
  • Nissan cabin framed as more luxurious
  • Honda RS framed as more sporty
  • Rear seat comfort leaned toward CR‑V (more reclining levels)

---

Overall Verdict / Recommendation (Based on the Video)

• Choose Nissan X‑Trail e‑POWER if you prioritize:
  • Strong, quick acceleration
  • More luxurious look/kit
  • Lower purchase price
• Choose Honda CR‑V e:HEV RS if you prioritize:
  • More solid/firm driving feel
  • Better steering weight
  • More refined/smoother feedback
  • Very comfortable rear seating
• The video positions the decision as very close, depending on whether you prefer:
  • Nissan’s e‑POWER “punch”
  • or Honda’s firmer, more confidence-inspiring chassis feel

---

Speaker-Specific Views

• Main reviewers / test drivers (repeated “friends/guys” framing):
  • Nissan: praised for acceleration and stable handling; criticized steering weight and refinement
  • Honda: praised for firmness, steering weight, smoothness/refinement; rear comfort praised
• Mentioned “senior colleague” / second person for CR‑V check:
  • Focused more on CR‑V description (RS styling, powertrain numbers, comfort/tech), then test-drive impressions and safety features
• “Pralai/Pralai adjusted…” comment:
  • Specifically about suspension/steering weight tuning comparison (CR‑V described as heavier/firmer than Nissan’s feel)