YES Halldor XTRM. Взял из-за дизайна!

Product reviewed

• YES / “Halldor XTRM” (spelled in subtitles as Yes, Heder Helder Extreme / “Hellder extreme”), size 156
• Presented as a pro-model “Extreme” snowboard
• Framed as a Lobster / Yes-related pro model with an “Extreme” build

Key features mentioned

Pro-model variant options

• Regular pro model
  • Softer, simpler, more comfortable
• Extreme pro model (XTRM)
  • More charged/aggressive
  • Includes carbon filling

Shape & riding type

• Twin board: described as absolutely symmetrical
• Curved nose and tail
  • Specifically praised for soft snow
• Freestyle-oriented
  • Not primarily positioned as freeride-only

Camber / flex behavior

• Uses Win and Twin camber
• Described as a fairly dense board
• Noted for flexing more between the bindings, giving a freestyle character:
  • Easier press/presc buts (presses)
  • Playful ride due to bending where the rider flexes it

3D base technology (triple / 3D “spoon”)

• Described as 3D-style beveled/contact-point edges
  • Creates a spoon-like lift in soft snow
• Called “Sai Kick” by the brand (as stated)
• Comparison to similar tech (especially Battalion):
  • Battalion: more pronounced, used more toward the front binding area
  • Lobster/YES: less pronounced, focusing more on contact points
• Claimed outcomes:
  • More smoothness / flotation in soft snow
  • Reduced harsh “ramming” of snow; board pushes snow apart
  • Aims to reduce pressure at contact points while retaining pop

Internal construction / flex zones

• Carbon under the bindings
• Additional reinforcement described as:
  • “stripes and crosses in the wound”
  • stronger nose + under-binding zone than mid-body

Snow feel + performance claims

• Good click/response
• Powerful push into the feet
• Subjective claim: can feel like it jumps ~1.5 meters farther off bumps compared to usual boards
• Soft-snow capability: “tolerably well” for a symmetrical twin

Pros (as stated)

• Aggressive/charged feel from Extreme carbon filling
• Good pop and strong power transfer (“crazy pop” emphasized)
• Playful freestyle flex
  • Softer/more flexible middle region
  • Easier presses/butters
• Soft-snow performance is better than expected for a twin
• 3D/Sai Kick improves:
  • smoothness/flotation
  • behavior on uneven terrain (nose doesn’t “stick” as easily)
• Excellent slipperiness
• Design is a major selling point
  • Reviewer says they bought it because of the design
  • Striking graphics (“tattooing” mentioned due to the visual appeal)

Cons / limitations (as stated)

• Not wide
  • Suggested as not a “wide” board; waist mentioned as ~25.6 (medium)
• Track/condition sensitivity
  • If conditions degrade (e.g., first track), the board may slightly lose drive per the brand’s note
  • Performance improves after a few runs as tracks soften
• Positioning for terrain expectations
  • Still framed more for resort/back-freestyle than true freeride-only

Comparisons made

Between pro-model versions

• Regular vs Extreme
  • Extreme is stiffer/more aggressive due to carbon

Against Battalion (3D tech)

• Battalion’s 3D “TPL B” described as more pronounced
  • used more extensively toward the front binding
• Lobster/YES uses a less pronounced version
  • focused around key contact/lift areas

Alternatives for wider setups

• For width: Airmaster / Airmaster Extreme
• Mentions “Freed model” / other boards as possible alternatives

Positioning / intended use

• Pro model described as:
  • more of a resort board / park-friendly choice for the reviewer
  • also workable for backcountry-style riding (mentioned rider: Vitaly)

User experience / how it rides (described)

• Bends between bindings → freestyle-friendly for butters/preses
• Charged nose & tail with curved shape:
  • Handles soft snow well for a twin
  • Reduces “stumbling” (landing/unevenness behavior described positively)
• Uneven terrain test:
  • Some instances of the nose hitting unexpected bumps on landing/approach
  • Still described as coming out smoothly without “sticking” like on another board

Ratings / numerical scores (mentioned)

• Size: 156
• Waist width estimate: ~25.6 (medium)
• Jump claim: ~1.5 meters farther off bumps vs their usual board (subjective but numeric)

Unique points mentioned (complete list of distinct ideas)

1. Extreme is the pro-model version; Regular exists and is softer/more comfortable.
2. Extreme includes carbon filling for more aggressive riding.
3. Brand context: multiple brands under one parent group; different boards made in different places.
4. Freestyle orientation: twin tips with different stiffness/shapes/widths/triple base configs.
5. Board is a twin, described as absolutely symmetrical, with curved nose and tail.
6. Curved nose/tail helps with soft snow.
7. Described as backcountry-capable by another rider, but resort/park-focused for the reviewer.
8. Flex behavior: flexes more between bindings, creating freestyle character.
9. Playfulness: easier press butters and trick initiation when the board bends.
10. Twist behavior: between-legs twisting limited; suggests needing speed for certain hooks.
11. Reinforcement: carbon under bindings and stronger nose/under-binding zones.
12. Rider experience: surprised by click/response and strong push into feet.
13. Claimed performance: ~1.5m farther jumps off bumps vs their usual board.
14. 3D “spoon” tech creates less pronounced contact-point lift compared with Battalion.
15. Tech naming: “Sai Kick.”
16. Spoon/3D purpose: increases floatation and smoothness in soft snow; reduces snow ramming.
17. Pressure reduction at contact points to improve smoothness while retaining pop.
18. Tech doesn’t feel “weird”; rides “like a regular snowboard” to the reviewer.
19. Uneven terrain behavior: nose doesn’t stick; comes out softly.
20. Slipperiness: described as good.
21. Brand note: slight drive loss on first track; improves after a few runs.
22. Not wide: waist ~25.6 (medium).
23. Wider alternative: Airmaster / Airmaster Extreme.
24. Design emphasis: visuals/graphics are a major reason to buy.

Speakers / views

• Single main reviewer/host provides all evaluation, tech explanation, and riding anecdotes
• Mentions another rider (Vitaly) for backcountry-style capability, but their direct opinions aren’t quoted

Verdict / recommendation

Recommended for freestyle riders who want an aggressive “Extreme” twin with carbon-enhanced pop, a playful mid flex, and surprisingly good soft-snow smoothness thanks to the 3D / Sai Kick contact-point lift.

Not ideal if you need a wide board (waist described as medium ~25.6). Consider Airmaster / Airmaster Extreme for width.

Overall: a strong resort/park freestyle choice with standout design and solid soft-snow behavior.