Daniel 9 Predicted the Year of Jesus' Return 2500 Years Ago | Almost NO ONE KNOWS THIS

Main ideas / lessons conveyed

• Jesus’ return can be associated with a specific year, not merely a vague “season,” by interpreting Daniel 9 (70 weeks) as containing a hidden timeline.
• Jesus is presented as not restricting knowledge of the year—rather, he is interpreted as restricting only knowledge of the day/hour (the exact day or hour is unknowable).
• The “weeks” in Daniel 9 are argued to mean 7-year periods (not 7-day weeks), based on Hebrew usage (shabuim) connected to Levitical sabbatical cycles.
• The prophecy is argued to be non-continuous, with an interruption (“gap”) after the first 69 weeks before the final (70th) week.
• The length of the gap is claimed to be encoded by Leviticus 26, using a sevenfold punishment framework tied to violated Sabbath years.
• The final claim is that Jesus’ return would occur in AD 2030, supported by:
  • Daniel 9 (described as the “one witness”) via the timeline math
  • Hosea (described as a “second witness”) via an additional calculation referenced from another video
• The video ends by urging a spiritual response (prayer, fasting, intercession, preparation) rather than speculation, using Daniel 9’s own example.

---

Method / calculation steps presented

1) Redefine “weeks” in Daniel 9

• Interpret Gabriel’s “70 weeks” (Daniel 9) as:
  • shabuim, meaning 7-year periods (sabbatical cycles), not 7-day weeks.
• Support for 7-year meaning:
  • Leviticus 25:1–4: 7-year cycle structure (6 years work, 1 year rest).
  • Leviticus 25:8–12: 7 sabbatical cycles (49 years) = one Jubilee.

2) Convert Daniel 9 “70 weeks” into Jubilees and segment it

• Since 1 Jubilee = 7 years × 7 = 49 years, Daniel’s “weeks” are treated as 7-year blocks.
• 70 shabuim (70 × 7 years) = 490 years = 10 Jubilees.
• Gabriel’s division:
  • 7 weeks
  • 62 weeks
  • 1 week
• Compute the first two segments:
  • 7 + 62 = 69 weeks
  • In Jubilee terms: 69 weeks = 9 full Jubilees + 6/7 of a Jubilee
• Key claim: the final week is “cut short,” and that cut short implies a gap.

3) Establish the existence of a gap using Daniel 9:25–27

• Anchor texts:
  • Daniel 9:25: “From the issuing of a decree… until Messiah the Prince shall be seven weeks and sixty-two weeks.”
    • This is treated as historically confirmed as 483 years to the Messiah.
  • Daniel 9:26: after the 62 weeks, the Messiah is “cut off,” then comes destruction and ongoing war.
• The argument identifies four events said to occur after the 69th week and before the 70th:
  • Messiah is cut off
  • The city and sanctuary are destroyed
  • Wars continue to the end
  • Desolations occur
• Conclusion: 70 weeks are not continuous; a gap is mathematically necessary.

4) Define what the “gap” represents

• Claim: the gap length is the time between:
  • Jesus’ crucifixion (Messiah “cut off”)
  • and Jesus’ return (the beginning/culmination tied to the final week)

5) Build a timeline chart for the gap events (as stated)

Within the gap:

1. Messiah cut off → identified with Jesus crucifixion/killing in AD 30
2. City and sanctuary destroyed → identified with AD 70 (Romans)
3. Wars continue → continuing unrest/war “till the end”
4. Desolations → long period of desolation, associated with:
   • AD 70 displacement patterns
   • later Bar Kokhba revolt effects

6) Compute the duration of “desolations” using Leviticus 26

• The speaker claims God encoded desolation duration in:
  • Leviticus 26:18, 21, 24, 28: sevenfold judgments repeated four times.
• Central link:
  • Leviticus 26:34: the land will enjoy its Sabbaths while desolate.
• External calculation:
  • 2 Chronicles 36:21: Israel violated Sabbath years amounting to 70 years of captivity (Babylon).
• Therefore:
  • Each sevenfold judgment = 7 × 70 years
  • Repeated 4 times → desolations duration = 4 × (70×7) = 1960 years

7) Translate “desolations” into a calendar year for return

• Desolations are said to begin with destruction of city/sanctuary (Daniel 9:26) → AD 70.
• Add:
  • AD 70 + 1960 years = AD 2030
• Claimed output:
  • Daniel 9 yields Jesus’ return year: AD 2030.

8) Confirm the starting point of the gap using AD 30 (Talmud)

• To justify Jesus’ crucifixion as AD 30, the speaker cites:
  • Talmud (Yoma 39B): claims 40 years before the temple was destroyed, certain supernatural signs began.
• Since the temple destruction is framed as AD 70:
  • 40 years prior = AD 30
• Therefore:
  • gap from crucifixion to return ≈ 40 years + 1960 years = ~2000 years
  • From AD 30 to AD 2030

9) Add a “second witness” to corroborate the year

• Speaker claims:
  • First witness: Daniel 9 timeline
  • Second witness: Hosea (via another referenced method/video), producing the same target year
• Argument:
  • Two independent prophetic lines and calculation methods reaching the same result make coincidence unlikely.

10) Conclude with application (not just prediction)

• Daniel’s response to understanding the timeline is presented as the model:
  • prayer
  • fasting
  • repentance
  • intercession for the nation
• The speaker urges viewers to mirror this posture because:
  • the end of desolations is said to be approaching
  • therefore the church should prepare and intercede.

---

Speakers / sources featured

Speaker

• Nelson Walters (described as “Bible teacher,” host of “Applied Bible Prophecy”)

Sources (scriptural and extra-biblical) cited or referenced

Bible

• Jesus’ statements (referred to generally; day/hour vs year implication)
• Daniel 8, 9, 11, 12 (mentioned as end-time/predictive context)
• Daniel 9:25–27
• Matthew 24:15
• Leviticus 25:1–4
• Leviticus 25:8–12
• Leviticus 26:18, 21, 24, 28, 34
• 2 Chronicles 36:21
• 2 Corinthians 13:1
• Hosea (referenced as “the prophet Hosea” and “In their affliction, they will earnestly seek me”)

Talmud / Rabbinic literature

• Yoma 39B (used to argue for AD 30 as the start point via a 40-year signs period)

Historical framing / events

• Roman-period historical framing (events attributed to the Romans in AD 70)
• Bar Kokhba revolt (referenced as contributing to desolation/displacement)