TAVI COSTA | We're Entering What Looks More Like the 1970s vs. 2008!

Finance-focused summary (Markets / Investing / Risk)

Macro & market regime thesis (1970s vs. 2008)

• Tavi Costa argues the market may be shifting more toward 1970s-like behavior (inflationary regime characteristics) rather than 2008-like correlation/contagion.
• Key “1970s” indicators cited:
  • Gold as a safe haven and hard assets doing that role.
  • The U.S. dollar not performing well relative to other fiat currencies.
  • Potentially buying foreign bonds as a safe-haven alternative without USD exposure.
• Probability framing:
  • Low probability of a 2008 scenario (in his view).
  • Higher likelihood of a mix of 2000-era tech rotation + 1970s-style regime.

Valuation / tech bubble risk; “flows” into real assets

• He warns markets look frothy on valuation:
  • CAPE ratio approaching 40+.
  • Claims this has only been seen at “tech bubble” levels, referencing 1929 and tech-bubble conditions.
• Despite bubble risk, his approach emphasizes flows:
  • Tech companies are portrayed as “forced” to keep spending aggressively (AI/data centers/innovation) under existential pressure.
  • He expects resulting capital flows to mining, infrastructure, and energy.
• He prefers “earners” (cash-flow generating businesses) over speculative “spenders,” implying mining/industrial resource exposure may benefit as leverage and cash-flow stress eventually redirects investment demand.

Credit spreads & risk monitoring (caution signal, not an entry)

• He watches credit spreads:
  • Widening/tightening framed as a potential early sign of credit deterioration.
  • He explicitly says credit spreads are used as a sign, not as an immediate investment idea.

Rates, USD, and precious metals tailwind

• He highlights a potential tailwind for precious metals due to rate expectations shifting:
  • Markets are said to have eliminated most further Fed hikes after “cooler inflation prints.”
  • He notes betting sites show under 10% remaining likelihood (approximate, as stated).
  • Even if the Fed holds steady, he views the adjustment as supportive.
• Real rates / bond market metrics cited:
  • 10-year real rates at ~two-year highs.
  • 3rd-year yields near ~two-decade highs (as stated).
  • Dollar overbought + real rates overbought + falling break-even inflation expectations → “tailwind” setup for gold/miners.
• Miners:
  • He claims miners are “super oversold” and possibly at levels similar to (or as bad as) 2008 in some short-term measures.

Gold setup: bottoming / choppy regime

• Context / recent levels referenced:
  • Gold near $1,700 in 2022 before a 14-year breakout.
  • Current as stated: below the 200-day moving average with ~32 consecutive sessions below.
  • Prior spike referenced: from ~$1,700 to ~$5,600 (over ~3.5 years).
• Outlook:
  • He downplays the likelihood of repeating the exact magnitude/timeline (“not a lot of weight” on matching that pattern).
  • Base case: digestion → choppy environment, with potential for 1–2 years of good performance.
  • Caution: not expecting the same 3-year outstanding run.

Seasonality + midterms (equities vs. metals) & catalysts

• Seasonality:
  • August–October is typically soft for precious metals.
• Midterms / policy:
  • He expects gridlock as the more likely scenario (could be positive for equities).
  • He also says gridlock is negative for gold due to the discipline it imposes on spending (per his view).
• Catalyst skepticism:
  • He doubts the midterms are a major catalyst, arguing markets may already be pricing political/policy implications.
• Tactical expectation:
  • A reversal of recent 3–6 month moves (e.g., USD strength and rate strength that “should have hurt gold and silver” but didn’t fully do so).

Fiscal arithmetic (“pie”): debt service crowds out growth spending

• He uses a framework:
  • Federal budget as a pie.
  • A growing portion goes to debt repayment, reducing room for pro-growth items (infrastructure/electric grids).
  • Government likely can’t “stop spending,” but will face suppression of rates (his interpretation) and eventually reallocates within the pie.
• Time horizon / trigger:
  • He suggests within the next ~six months, changes in policy calculations—potentially including inflation assessment adjustments based on AI productivity—could shift the environment.

---

Precious metals supply/demand: secular bull argument (gold)

Gold supply stagnation + central bank demand

• Gold supply:
  • “Stagnant for ~15 years.”
  • Record output cited: 3,672 tons (near previous record 2018: 3,663 tons).
  • Exploration cutbacks:
    • Exploration budgets slashed after 2011.
    • “Very few large discoveries” in recent years.
• Central banks:
  • Record purchases over the last 5 years, building reserves.
• Conclusion:
  • He calls it a secular bull market thesis: constrained supply + persistent demand pressure.

Mining realities: grades, margins, and lack of exploration response

• He argues mining is increasingly reliant on older discoveries:
  • Projects “found in the 80s and 90s.”
  • New discoveries from the last ~10 years are limited.
• Grade deterioration:
  • Reserves with deteriorating grades → worse economics/margins for miners.
  • However, profitability has remained strong because metal prices are far above cost.
• He is concerned about the missing link:
  • Despite high profitability, miners have not increased exploration budgets (instead, he claims exploration has gone lower).
  • This could extend the supply deficit cycle.

Explicit valuation / expectations caution

• He frames a key investment caution:
  • The “blood in the streets” moment is where opportunity exists, but retail typically comes after the move and may not achieve outsized returns.
• He pushes for long-term discipline and expectation management.

---

Investing strategy applied to miners (framework/logic)

Core steps / framework mentioned (implicit but identifiable)

• Step 1: Set the macro regime (inflationary vs. deflationary) using historical analogs.
• Step 2: Identify valuation froth (e.g., CAPE/valuation extremes) but don’t assume immediate collapse; consider “flows.”
• Step 3: Track rates/FX/real yields:
  • Dollar and real rates positioning (overbought/oversold).
  • Break-even inflation expectations trend.
• Step 4: Use credit spreads as an early warning (risk-management signal).
• Step 5: For metals/miners, assess:
  • Supply constraints (stagnant mine supply, discovery scarcity).
  • Central bank demand.
  • Mining economics (grades/cost pressure vs metal prices).
• Step 6: Favor “earners” (cash flow compounding potential) over speculative growth that relies on continued financing.

Intrinsic value vs. market price

• He argues miners’ intrinsic values haven’t been “breached” because:
  • Fundamentals have improved despite drawdowns.
• Gold level claim:
  • Gold is cited as up ~$700/oz vs a year ago while prices are lower than recent peaks—supporting the expectation that earnings can keep rising for miners.
• Valuation assumptions caution:
  • He says many bank DCF models assume unrealistic long-run metal price paths (e.g., gold prices falling 10 years out), i.e., backwardation-like assumptions that later need revision (referencing “backwardation vs contango” conceptually).

---

Sector/component views & key numbers

Silver miners vs primary silver miners

• Byproduct economics:
  • ~73% of silver comes as a byproduct of copper/zinc/lead/gold mining.
• “ASIC” (cost) for producing silver as a byproduct:
  • Often near free, sometimes under $1/oz for the silver portion (as stated).
• Main/primary silver producers:
  • Higher ASIC range of ~$15–$25/oz.
• His response:
  • He doesn’t want investors to exclude primary silver mines; prefers diversification across metals.
  • Example optimism:
    • Mentions a case where a mine produces at ~$15/oz.
• Returns/expectations:
  • He expects “triple digits” in silver eventually (no specific number given).

Diversification rationale for risk management

• He likes diversified exposure across:
  • Gold (safe-haven characteristics),
  • Copper (high-beta to the economy),
  • Silver/zinc/lead (volatile together).
• He claims this combination can help manage differing price behavior across cycles.

Copper thesis: resilience + asymmetry

• Observations:
  • Copper has been “surprisingly resilient” during recent precious-metals weakness.
• Interpretation:
  • Early price discovery (similar to prior gold/silver breakout narratives).
• Potential upside:
  • He suggests copper could double in the next 2–3 years (not required, but “wouldn’t be shocked”).
• “Real AI trade” claim:
  • He calls copper the “one” (primary AI-related investment theme).

Energy view (tied to inputs / ratios; relative value)

• Natural gas:
  • He says natural gas looks exceptionally cheap historically using the oil-to-natural-gas ratio (BTU equivalent).
• Oil:
  • Oil’s relative valuation vs oil companies (ratio described as remaining elevated) → oil more volatile.
• Caution:
  • Understand asset pricing differences/logistics (he references instances of natural gas appearing “negative” due to regional pricing/ports).
• Specific tickers mentioned:
  • None.

---

Instruments / assets / tickers explicitly mentioned

No specific stock tickers, ETF tickers, bonds, commodities symbols, or indices were provided.

Metals / commodities named (by class)

• Gold
• Silver
• Copper
• Zinc
• Lead
• Oil (energy)
• Natural gas

Monetary/market variables

• USD
• Real yields / 10-year real rates
• Break-even inflation expectations
• CAPE / Shiller CAPE
• Credit spreads
• 200-day moving average
• Dollar strength
• Fed policy rate hikes (probability)

---

Key recommendations / cautions (explicit)

• Expectation management: don’t assume identical gold/run timing; likely choppy digestion vs a straight breakout.
• Bottoming in miners: miners are “super oversold,” potentially near a significant bottom (implied opportunity window).
• Valuation modeling caution:
  • DCF assumptions using overly bearish long-run metal prices can be wrong; intrinsic value may be understated.
• Portfolio mindset:
  • Lean on conviction during volatility.
  • Let winners run.

---

Disclosures / disclaimers

• No formal “not financial advice” disclaimer is shown in the provided subtitles.

---

Presenters / sources mentioned

• Gary Bone (host)
• Tavi Costa (co-founder & CEO of Aurora Capital)
• Ray Dalio (quote referenced in the show’s Substack/free report promotion)
• Kevin Walsh (referenced regarding hawkish stance / Fed involvement)
• Jeff Bezos (margin quote reference)
• Company/example mention: Hecla
• Aurora Capital (Costa’s firm)
• “Metals and Miners” Substack / channel promotion (source name used; not a financial instrument)