Video summary

I Tested ALL PC Tweaking Utilities - Which One's The Best for Gaming in 2025?

Main summary

Key takeaways

Technology

Tech/Product Focus

The video is a benchmarking and safety review of six paid PC “tweaking utilities” (aimed at improving FPS and input latency) compared against a free Windows stock tweaking approach.

The creator also includes commentary on potential security risk (virus detections) and warns about scam-like “gaming aim/Bloom” branded utilities.

Test Methodology (Key Analysis Details)

  • Breadth: Tested 6 paid utilities across 9 games, then compared them to stock Windows with a free tweaking utility.
  • Reproducibility: Required 8 Windows reinstalls to keep conditions consistent.
  • Controls used:
    • Clean install
    • Same drivers
    • Same Windows build + all updates
  • Application behavior: After purchase, the creator applied literally everything on-site (maximum / “use all features” approach).

Metrics Used

  1. Latency (referred to as “Latency Meme”)
  2. Ping (not improved by any utility in the creator’s environment)
  3. Thermals (interpreted as mainly affected by power plans and room temperature; measured across multiple days with varying weather)
  4. Security: “total number of virus detections” per utility
    • Includes a caveat that detections may be false positives; viewers are advised to check VirusTotal behavior before installing
  5. Game benchmarks: FPS and 1% lows
  6. Input lag benchmarks: percentage latency improvement per game

Headline Performance Results (FPS / 1% Lows)

Overall Findings

  • Combined FPS gains: Only about 3–10% average FPS boost across all games, which the creator says is far less than what many utilities advertise.
  • Ping: No utility decreased ping by even 1 (possibly due to already strong connectivity).

Game-by-Game Highlights

  • Valorant:
    • AtomX top
    • Reported ~14% FPS average and ~25% 1% lows
  • PUBG:
    • AtomX crashed frequently and couldn’t run
    • Booster X top (~10% average over stock)
  • Warzone:
    • Booster X top (~10%)
    • Paragon (free) placed last
  • Marvel Rivals:
    • Minimal change (~3.7% within margin of error)
    • AtomX top, EXM/Paragon slightly worse than stock
  • CS2:
    • Top was Nexus (~9.5% avg FPS, ~7.9% 1% lows)
    • Most others (except the top three) were worse than stock
  • Rainbow Six Siege:
    • Biggest FPS improvement so far: up to ~21% by AtomX
  • League of Legends:
    • VTRL reached up to ~34.4%
    • AtomX/Nexus slightly worse than stock
  • World of Warcraft:
    • AtomX up to ~25%
  • Fortnite:
    • Nexus top (~16.5% avg FPS, ~12% 1% lows)

Stability / Feature-Quality Review (Tutorial-Like Observations)

AtomX

  • Performed well in benchmarks, but had the most problems:
    • UI described as simple but outdated
    • Required uninstalling antivirus to run
    • Frequent game crashes
    • PUBG couldn’t start

Nexus

  • Generally strong overall:
    • Simple UI, “a lot of tweaks,” good explanations, easy navigation
  • Downside:
    • Reportedly didn’t allow monthly subscribers to access BIOS tweaks

Hone

  • Modern UI and features:
    • Optimization presets, “full BIOS access,” AI assistant, decent explanations
    • Can show “recently applied” tweaks (helpful for troubleshooting)

Paragon / Performance V4 (free)

  • Clean, simple
  • Only ~5 tweaks
  • No explanations of what changes do (less transparency)

Booster X

  • Similar positioning to Hone:
    • Optimization presets, AI assistant, common PC issue fixes
    • Included an “improvised latency tester”
    • 1-day free trial

EXM

  • Tons of tweaks but weaker UX/safety experience:
    • Outdated UI, minimal explanation of effects
    • No clear on/off toggle (hard to tell what’s applied)
    • Reported freezing, then full crash / could not re-enter Windows

VTRL

  • Described as the easiest premium option
  • Fewer tweaks than others, but the creator wanted recommended BIOS tweaks for further improvement

“Risen Tweaks / RISXN Tweaks” (Scam Warning)

  • Criticized for selling “aim tweaks” and “bloom reducers” claimed to do nothing
  • Branded tactics: “no delay” and other marketing aimed at quick improvement without training
  • Creator claims they are just regular Windows tweaks branded for gaming
  • Alleged add-ons: separate payment for weapon category tweaks (e.g., shotgun/SMG)
  • Broader claim (as argued by the creator): if they truly modified game files, Epic Games would have sued them

Input Latency / Input Lag Results (Key Points)

  • Valorant: Stock worst; Nexus top with about 14% less latency
  • PUBG: Paragon (free) top with about 20% less input latency
  • Warzone: Subtle differences; AtomX slightly best (~6.2% less), others close to stock
  • Marvel Rivals: Data issue or skipped (creator comments it’s “unoptimizable”)
  • CS2: AtomX and Booster X nearly tied; up to ~18% lower delay vs stock
  • Rainbow Six Siege: AtomX massive win—up to ~39.5% lower input delay
  • LoL and World of Warcraft: No data collected because the creator’s latency method requires in-game muzzle flash, which those games didn’t provide in their capture method
  • Fortnite: Nexus top with 20%+ less input latency; others near stock

Final Recommendations (As Stated)

  • The creator frames the results as: you likely should not expect huge FPS gains vs what free/stock approaches can do.
  • For lowest input latency overall, they state they have “best tweaking utilities” (but the provided subtitle text does not include the final ranked list—only that statement).
  • Alternative to paying: The creator claims you can get similar FPS improvement for free by joining their Discord, with power plans and custom operating systems.

Main Speakers / Sources (From the Subtitle)

  • Primary speaker: the video creator/reviewer (name not given in subtitles)
  • Sponsor/source: Surfshark (included promo/URL and features)
  • Data source referenced: VirusTotal
  • Community source referenced: the creator’s Discord (for free alternatives)

Original video