"Buy The Dip"? Is SCHD Still The Best Dividend Fund?

Finance-focused summary (SCHD / SCD “buy the dip?”)

Key tickers / instruments / sectors mentioned

• SCD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF; also referred to as SCHD in places)
• S&P 500 exposure via SWPPX (Schwab S&P 500 index fund) — included for comparison
• Underlying benchmark index: Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 (SCD’s tracked index)
• Notable individual holdings named (top names):
  • Qualcomm (QCOM)
  • Texas Instruments (TXN)
  • Coca-Cola (KO)
  • Procter & Gamble (PG)
  • Merck (MRK)
  • Chevron (CVX)
  • Verizon (VZ)
  • ConocoPhillips (COP) (spelled as “Konoko Phillips” in the text)
• Other holdings named:
  • UnitedHealth (UNH)
  • Home Depot (HD)
• Other structured products (not specific tickers):
  • Annuities (including SPIAs and fixed indexed annuities)
  • Treasuries / safe bonds
  • CDs
  • Mentions structured protection ETFs (no specific tickers given)

Disclosures / disclaimers called out

• “Not tax advisor” (Diamond Nest is not a tax advisor; consult a tax professional)
• “Past performance is no guarantee of future results”
• “No one can predict or time the market”
• The text does not explicitly say “Not financial advice”, but it includes multiple suitability/tax cautions (e.g., “sleep well at night,” consult professionals)

---

Methodology / framework used by SCD (index rules / screening)

SCD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100, using four main inputs:

• Free cash flow
• Return on equity (profitability metric)
• Indicated annual yield (IAY) / “expected dividend yield over the next 12 months”
• Historical 5-year dividend growth rate

---

Portfolio construction / characteristics (as described)

• Dividend fund characterization:
  • Still a stock/equity fund, so investors remain exposed to equity market cycle risk
• Dividend fund limitations (contrasted with bonds/annuities/structured products):
  • Do not guarantee dividends
  • Do not protect principal (unlike bonds/annuities)
  • Do not cap upside like some structured products (gains can still occur if holdings surge)
• Sector tilts (approximate):
  • Health care: ~20%
  • Consumer staples: ~20%
  • Energy: ~14%
  • Industrials: ~11.5%+
  • Financials: ~10%+
  • Information technology: ~9.2% (limited tech exposure vs many growth indexes)
• Holdings described as more defensive / “old economy, cash-generating.”

---

Fund scale / basic facts (timing: September 2026)

• SCD total assets: $109.6B
• Expense ratio: 6 basis points
• Inception: October 2011
• Dividend frequency: 4 times per year
• Share price referenced: $33.20
  • Note: the text mentions subtitle inconsistencies (e.g., “3320”); intended value likely $33.20
• Timestamp noted:
  • As of close of market September 25, 2026
  • “Taping” noted as September 28, 2026

---

Performance metrics & key numbers

Dividend yields (income-focused)

• 30-day SEC yield: 3.27%
• TTM distribution yield: 3.00%
• The similarity is framed as evidence of consistency.

Dividend growth (historical)

• Dividend per share growth shown as (text appears garbled/inconsistent):
  • $2.7 in 2012 → $1.5 in 2025
• Despite subtitle inconsistencies, the video frames dividend growth as “nice and stable.”

Qualified dividends (tax characteristics)

• 98.5% qualified dividends in 2025
• Claim: qualified dividends may receive lower long-term capital gains rates in taxable accounts.

Total returns (price + distributions)

• 1-year trailing total return: 27.34%
• 5-year trailing total return: 9.57% annualized
• 10-year trailing total return: 12.76% annualized

Qualified-dividend tax comparison example (explicit recommendation logic)

• If in a 37% tax bracket, the video states you’d need about 4.15% from fully taxable bonds/non-qualified dividends to match after-tax payout of SCD’s:
  • ~3% TTM distribution yield
  • assuming 20% long-term capital gains tax rate on qualified dividends

SCD vs S&P 500 fund comparison (SWPPX)

• TTM cash distribution yield:
  • SCD: 3.0%
  • SWPPX: 0.98%
• Performance framing:
  • Post-Great Financial Crisis: returns described as not far apart
  • COVID era: mixed performance
  • Past ~3 years: SWPPX ahead “hands down”, attributed to missing out on the “AI boom”
• Conclusion framing:
  • If the AI theme is a “bubble,” outcomes could change
  • Otherwise, equity growth has dominated recently

---

“Buy the dip?” guidance and recommendations (decision framework)

Timing / “dip” argument

• SCD share price down ~5.2% over the past month (as of Sep 28, 2026)
• S&P 500 described as ~flat over the same period (-0.6%)
• Pitch: may be a “buy-the-dip” opportunity if investing for income and defensive exposure

---

When the video suggests SCD may be appropriate (3-part “if you agree” checklist)

1. You want supplementary income (retirement-oriented) and like the dividend metrics:
   • dividend growth framed as stable (subtitle figures appear inconsistent)
   • TTM yield ~3%
   • potential tax angle for taxable accounts via qualified dividends
2. You want inflation protection via “real asset” dividends and can accept equity volatility:
   • points to 10-year annualized total return ~12.76%
   • emphasizes no guarantee of dividends/principal
3. You want defensive diversification and can accept equity risk:
   • defensive tilt may help balance growthier equity exposure

---

When the video argues SCD may not fit (3-part “if you agree” checklist)

1. You need lifelong guaranteed income:
   • dividend funds don’t guarantee principal or dividends
   • alternatives mentioned: SPIAs, fixed indexed annuities with income riders, QLACs
     • note: text references “QAX,” likely meaning Qualified Longevity Annuity Contracts (QLACs)
   • also mentions safe bond ladders and CDs
2. You’re in a growth phase and prioritize higher total returns:
   • video suggests putting more into the “boost” via S&P 500 index funds
3. You expect markets to peak and correct/crash soon:
   • video suggests considering structured downside/income solutions rather than full equity exposure

---

Portfolio construction suggestion (example allocation + implementation)

• If close to retirement / retired:
  • Base part: add a fixed indexed annuity with an income rider (rates described as “attractive”)
  • Boost part: allocate to:
    • a dividend fund (e.g., SCD)
    • broad market funds for higher growth potential
• Purchase pacing:
  • consider dollar-cost averaging over months or years instead of buying all at once

---

Presenters / sources

• Marcus (host; “Markets with Marcus”)
• Jen (mentioned during the discussion)
• Diamond Nest (channel/brand context; no external research source named beyond a referenced yield metric)