Indigenous Activism in the Nordic Countries — Virtual Panel

Summary

The panel examined Indigenous activism in Greenland and Sápmi, focusing on land and water protection, self-determination, cultural continuity, and the challenges posed by resource development.

Current Struggles

Qivioq Nivi Løvstrøm described her work on children’s and youth issues, international Indigenous advocacy, and opposition to uranium mining in Greenland. She said Greenland’s recent election brought in a government opposed to uranium mining.

Sofia Jannok discussed efforts to protect Sámi ancestral lands and reindeer-grazing forests in Sweden, including a campaign that helped pause planned logging on 700 hectares. Beaska Niillas highlighted opposition to a proposed copper mine whose waste could harm a fjord and nearby grazing lands, as well as concerns about wind-power projects that disrupt Sámi livelihoods.

Indigenous Identity and Rights

Panelists stressed that Indigenous peoples are contemporary communities, not remnants of the past. Løvstrøm recalled growing up with ideas that made it difficult to connect being Greenlandic with being Indigenous. Jannok noted that Sámi people are sometimes treated as though they no longer exist.

The panel rejected misconceptions that Indigenous rights claims seek special treatment or superiority. Instead, they are claims to basic rights, including language, education, livelihood, land, and self-determination. Løvstrøm added that calls for Greenlandic independence should not be mistaken for hostility toward Denmark.

Green Colonialism

The speakers warned that projects promoted as climate solutions can reproduce colonial patterns when Indigenous communities bear the costs and have little say in decisions. They cited logging presented as sustainable forestry, mining described as necessary for a “green” transition, and renewable-energy projects that damage lands and reindeer herding.

Løvstrøm also discussed pressure against traditional hunting and locally harvested food, arguing that these practices can be more sustainable than relying on imported goods.

Media and Public Understanding

Panelists criticized coverage that repeats company or government claims without scrutiny, including misleading uses of terms such as “forest” for plantations. They also described biased reporting and inadequate representation of Indigenous perspectives.

Niillas and Jannok called for more investigative journalism and urged media to question green claims rather than accept them at face value.

Solidarity and Support

The panel welcomed allies but emphasized that they should educate themselves, listen, and work alongside Indigenous communities—not speak for them. Panelists noted that some organizations, including Greenpeace in Greenland, have a history that has damaged trust. They also recognized the value of allies who have done their homework and amplify Indigenous voices.

Suggested ways to engage included supporting Indigenous organizations and learning about land-back efforts. Jannok pointed to the Arvas Foundation as one avenue for supporting Sámi land work.

Presenters and Contributors

• Ed Gallagher: Opening and closing remarks
• Victoria Qutuuq Buschman: Moderator
• Sofia Jannok: Panelist
• Qivioq Nivi Løvstrøm: Panelist
• Beaska Niillas: Panelist