This is the best video I've ever watched..

Overview

The video argues that women’s voting behavior has produced a measurable “political gender gap” and that women’s suffrage (granting women the right to vote) is therefore a major driver of broader social and political outcomes. The speaker frames the discussion as an “honest review” of women’s suffrage, claiming it has not produced better governance and may have harmed society.

Core Claims and Reasoning

No “patriarchy” in democracies (as presented)

The video claims the premise of a patriarchy is false in contemporary democracies, arguing that:

• women have higher turnout, and
• women often outnumber men,

so women could “win every election” if they voted as a bloc.

“Women control” key institutions (as presented)

The video asserts that women exert influence through:

• Education: by numbers, they are said to shape children’s politics.
• HR/professional settings: it claims HR employees avoid hiring people aligned with right-wing politics.

Family court leverage and marriage bargaining

The video claims family court outcomes give women asymmetric leverage in marriage, reinforcing the theme that women already hold substantial political and institutional power.

Alleged Downstream Social Effects

The state as a “substitute husband”

A central thesis is that many women vote for policies that expand the state’s role (e.g., welfare, redistribution, and regulation) because the state can replace what the speaker calls traditional male roles of:

• protection, and
• provision.

State needs male resources

The video argues the state can only fund these programs by taking resources from men, framing this as a kind of forced disenfranchisement of men.

Voting patterns tied to welfare, guns, immigration, and abortion

The video cites asserted gaps where women supposedly support:

• greater welfare expansion,
• more gun control,
• mass immigration, and
• abortion policies, including support for killing unborn children “for any reason.”

The speaker interprets these gaps as evidence that women vote in ways that:

• weaken families, and
• increase polarization/spending.

Declining families and incentives to avoid commitment

The video argues that suffrage changes political incentives from pleasing families to appealing to individual voters, encouraging politicians to push policies that:

• sabotage or delay family formation,
• especially by targeting or appealing to single women rather than couples.

Historical / Analogy Framework

Aristophanes’ “The Assembly of Women”

The speaker claims the ancient Greek play predicted modern outcomes, including:

• welfare expansion,
• weakened family structures,
• chaos in relationships,
• hostility to private property,
• social effects of women’s political control.

“Pandora’s Box” framing

The conclusion likens suffrage to opening a box whose consequences are predictable and difficult to reverse.

Nuance Acknowledged (Within the Thesis)

Not all women vote the same way

The video claims:

• Women in stable, long-term relationships are said to be more conservative and less likely to rely on the state as a substitute.
• Less successful women (in the speaker’s view) are said to be more likely to support redistribution policies.

Libertarian vs welfare, proxied through relationships

It links this to a “libertarian vs welfare” framing, but “proxied through relationships,” concluding that incentives for promiscuity/non-commitment function like a form of socialism for “undesirable women” (language used in the subtitles).

“Honest Review” Conclusion

The speaker concludes that current outcomes—such as:

• high government spending,
• low family formation,
• loneliness/depression,
• entrenched institutions, and
• policies allegedly responsible for these effects—

are all “consistently upheld by the female vote.”

Overall judgment: 0/10, with the speaker saying they “would not recommend opening a door” to total societal collapse again.

Presenters / Contributors (As Mentioned)

• No specific other presenter is clearly identified.
• The video is attributed to a channel: Basic Logic (mentioned in the subtitles).