Video summary
I Ranked The Cheapest Places To Live (and Retire) In The UK
Main summary
Key takeaways
Finance-/economic takeaway (housing affordability framework)
The video ranks the cheapest places to live/retire in the UK using multiple affordability lenses, arguing that price-only rankings (e.g., house purchase prices) can be misleading because they ignore:
- Rent levels
- Local incomes
- Fixed-income constraints
- Health and life-expectancy context
Key data sources (as described)
-
Property Registry’s Housing Price Index
- Uses average house prices by local authority
- Framed as “10 cheapest vs 10 most expensive” (local authorities)
-
Office for National Statistics (ONS)
- Average private rents by council area (England & Wales only)
- Scottish council areas not provided in full detail (only broader areas)
- Northern Ireland not covered in the described dataset
- Income Survey: average full-time salary by area
- Life expectancy by area (women emphasized in examples)
- Average private rents by council area (England & Wales only)
-
UK rental assistance
- Mentioned as an affordability factor (no numbers provided)
Tickers / instruments / assets
- None mentioned
- No stocks, bonds, ETFs, crypto, or commodities referenced.
Step-by-step methodology / ranking framework (explicitly used)
Step 1: House-price-only ranking
Rank local authorities by average house price using the Property Registry Housing Price Index.
Step 2: Convert to rent-only affordability context
Use ONS average private rent (England & Wales focus; Scotland only partially via broad areas).
Step 3: Rent-to-income ratios
Compute the portion of salary going to rent:
- Rent share of salary = (annual rent) / (pre-tax annual full-time salary)
Rank places by how much local wages are consumed by rent.
Step 4: “Leftover after rent” (after-tax cashflow)
Compute monthly take-home after rent:
- Monthly take-home after rent = [ \frac{\text{annual salary} - \text{income tax \& social security}}{12} - \text{monthly rent} ]
Simplifications used:
- Excludes pension contributions
- Assumes the person rents alone
- Reorders “cheapest” based on real affordability rather than price alone
Step 5: Fixed-income scenario test (nurse / retiree examples)
Instead of using local salaries, apply a fixed national income (e.g., nurse starting pay in England & Wales). Recompute affordability to reflect that income may not change with postcode.
Effect described:
- When income doesn’t “move” with the area, rankings revert toward rent-only dynamics.
Step 6: Add life expectancy as a second dimension
Reorder by life expectancy (women used as the primary example), then combine:
- Rent/income affordability and
- Life expectancy
…to identify “best tradeoffs.”
Key numbers and rankings mentioned
House purchase prices (Property Registry Housing Price Index)
- Cheapest average house price: Inverclyde at just under £115,500
- Next: West Dunbartonshire, then Aberdeen
- Cheapest in England (buy): Burnley at £135,000+
- Most expensive: Kensington & Chelsea at £1.2M+
- Over 10× the cheapest
Rents (ONS average private rents; England & Wales focus)
-
Lowest rent:
- Hartlepool: £558/month (tied)
- Powys: £621/month (central Wales example)
- Burnley: £631/month
-
Highest rent:
- Kensington & Chelsea: £3,690/month
-
Monthly rent spread: difference of > £3,000/month between cheapest and most expensive areas
Rent burden vs local pre-tax salary
- Burnley salary: just over £31,000/year
- Tower Hamlets salary (near Canary Wharf): just over £66,500/year
- Lowest rent burden (best ratio): Cumberland (Cumbria)
- Rent = 19.1% of local wages
- Second: Ribble Valley
- Rent = 19.9%
- Burnley rent-burden rank: 21st
- Worst rent burden:
- Kensington & Chelsea: rent = 97.1% of average local wage
“After tax and rent” cash remaining (monthly)
- Ribble Valley: £2,436/month left after rent
- Returned to #1 on this metric
- Burnley: a little over £1,500/month remaining
- Ranked 109th out of 316
- Largest climber: Tower Hamlets
- Jumped from 307th to 49th (driven by higher salaries)
- Worst: Kensington & Chelsea
- £661/month less (despite local salary)
Fixed-income scenario: Newly qualified nurse (England & Wales)
- Nurse starting salary (England): just over £32,000/year
- After taxes/social security: about £2,220/month (stated)
- Applied similarly for Wales (explicit simplification)
Re-ranking outcomes under fixed income:
- Hartlepool: becomes #1 (rent-only effect dominates)
- Nurse has ~£1,660/month
- Ribble Valley: drops from 1st to 69th
- Tower Hamlets: falls to 307th
- Kensington & Chelsea:
- Nurse short by ~£1,472/month
- Conclusion stated: “couldn’t afford to live there”
- Many London boroughs:
- rent consumes the nurse’s entire net salary
- Nurse central London supplement:
- nurse pay ~£38,500/year
- still a shortfall > £1,000 in Kensington & Chelsea
Retiree/fixed income note
For incomes that “move with you” (e.g., state pension, annuity, final salary pension), “the cheapest” tends to mean the lowest rent.
Life expectancy dimension (ONS)
Women’s life expectancy extremes (by area, reordered):
- Kensington & Chelsea: just over 87 years (best)
- Hartlepool: a little over 80 years (among bottom 10)
- Blackpool: 79 years (worst among mentioned)
Men:
- Average about 72.5 years (stated)
Gap described:
- Almost 7 years between the “cheapest vs most expensive” comparison, in the combined framing.
Caution/disclaimer embedded in interpretation:
- High life expectancy in an area does not guarantee you personally will gain those years by moving.
Combined final examples: “best tradeoffs”
- Final (fixed income) cheapest in England & Wales: Hartlepool
- Rent-only match across the entire UK: only Dumfries and Galloway matches that cheap rent figure
Powys (second in combined final list):
- Rent: £621/month
- Monthly leftover: £1,597/month
- Women’s life expectancy: just over 83.5 years
- Claims: above UK average of 83 years
- Compared vs Hartlepool:
- £63 more per month in rent
- but higher life expectancy by several years (stated as “more than 3 years longer”)
Explicit recommendations / cautions
- Do not rely on house-price-only rankings
- Affordability depends on rent and local income
- For people whose income depends on location, rent-to-income is critical
- For people on fixed income (nurse case; retirees), rent-only affordability dominates
- Life expectancy is correlational
- Moving does not automatically change lifespan
- Check rent + life expectancy together
- Video suggests verifying with ONS data (about 10 minutes)
- Consider rental assistance effects before moving (no detailed numbers)
- Discuss the move with family/support networks
- (Grandchildren frequency emphasized)
Disclaimers / disclosures
- No explicit “not financial advice” phrasing appears in the provided subtitles.
- A methodological caveat is stated: treat results as comparisons between places, not necessarily a personal family budget.
Presenters / sources
- Presenter/voice: Zack (introduced as “My name is Zack”)
- Primary data sources named:
- Property Registry (Housing Price Index)
- ONS (rents, incomes, life expectancy)
- Website mentioned: financialeducation.co.uk (additional planning context)
Rate this summary
Your feedback will help improve summaries.
Improve this summary
Reprocess with a stronger model when the summary feels incomplete or inaccurate.
Translate summary in another language
Ask questions to this video
Chat for follow-up questions, clarifications, and source-backed answers.