ATK A9 SE vs ATK X1 SE vs VXE R1 SE+, Dưới 500k mua chuột nào là TỐT NHẤT?

Product being reviewed

A comparison of three budget gaming mice from ATK/VGN/VXE (same brand family), aimed at shoppers under ~500k VND:

• VXE R1 SE+
• ATK X1 SE
• ATK A9 SE+

---

Key points mentioned

Color options

• A9 SE: most vibrant colors (white, black, pink)
• X1 SE: two colors (black, white)
• R1 SE+: same as X1 (black, white)

Pricing / deal availability

• X1 SE and A9 SE: both around ~5 “tires” (author’s unit), considered similar price.
• R1 SE+: author suggests it’s higher-priced and doesn’t need hunting for sales (around 1.5× the typical 3–4 tire range).
• V12+ (baseline mention): can drop to roughly 38–40 or even ~300 on sale; author says it’s very cheap.

Build quality / finish

VXE R1 SE+

• Used for ~1 year; still happy with it.
• Matte ABS coating; might peel later (typical ABS risk).
• Coating feels sticky/grippy and smoother than X1/A9.

ATK X1 SE

• A friend’s complaint centered mainly on grip/coating feel and overall experience.
• Frame/chassis described as lightweight but on par with R1.

ATK A9 SE+

• Reported as having the worst build quality (reviewer’s experience).
• Click reliability issue: after squeezing hard:
  • X1 and R1 SE+ unaffected
  • A9 affected immediately
• Click/tactility criticized further (also mentioned again later).

Durability / structural feel

• R1 SE+ and X1: both lightweight with well-made chassis/sturdiness.
• R1 SE+ feels less “soft” in the chassis than X1.
• Bottom shell: has concave bottom like many prior X1 series models.
• A9: explicitly called out for poor build and needing attention.

Technology / wireless claims

• Reviewer doesn’t find major “technology” differences among the three.
• MCU comparison:
  • One uses an older MCU lineage reference
  • Others use a “near dual-silicon” / Nearing MCU type (Huawei-related claim)
• Theory claim (not directly measured by reviewer):
  • Nearing/near-link tech is slightly better:
    • More stable connection speeds
    • 3–6× better battery efficiency vs regular Bluetooth (per Huawei claim)
• 2.4G details: little concrete info; mainly stated as battery-saving.

Main practical issue noted (X1 model):

• Slight delay
• “Performance mode” tradeoff: enabling it for performance drains battery, so it’s effectively similar to “draining.”

Sensor / tracking

• All three are described as essentially using the same sensor approach:
  • 3311 / 18,000 DPI mentioned for R1 SE+ and X1 SE
  • A9 SE also uses the 3311 chip
• Conclusion: no meaningful optical performance difference (per reviewer).
• DPI usage mention:
  • 1600 DPI for Valor
  • R ping 1000
  • Reviewer says results feel the same because the mice are similarly limited/behavioral on those settings.

Main decision factor: click feel + hand feel (shape)

VXE R1 SE+

• Recommended for small hands
• Familiar egg/G102-GPro Hero style shape (author upgraded from G102/G Pro Hero)
• Click feels smooth; scroll wheel smoother too.

ATK X1 SE

• Shape similar to Viper V3 Pro (pro-friendly)
• Click is firmer and rougher than R1/A9
• Very low pre-/post-travel (tight/quick feel)
• Works for small to medium hands; good for claw and fingertip grips
• Author warns pom grip isn’t practical for this model
• Click button described as tight, potentially because the mouse is short

ATK A9 SE+

• Best for medium to large hands
• Shape described as “ridiculous”/not ideal for small hands
• Heavy/tiring clicks for reviewer’s hand
• Buttons feel tight; back is higher
• Clicking is slower and smoother, but not a major problem if you want quick input (reviewer hedges this).

Overall ranking by reviewer’s sturdiness experience

• R1 → X1 → A9 (most to least sturdy)
• A9 is the clear weak link due to build/click issues.

---

Pros / Cons (as stated or implied)

VXE R1 SE+

Pros

• Smooth, sticky matte coating (good grip)
• Smooth click + smoother scroll
• Good for small hands; familiar shape feel
• Used successfully for ~1 year

Cons

• Matte coating may peel later (ABS risk)

ATK X1 SE

Pros

• Strong/light chassis; good form factor (Viper-like)
• Suitable for claw/fingertip; small–medium hands

Cons

• Slight delay
• Firmer/rougher click feel
• Tight/short ergonomics; friend criticized it mainly on experience/grip

ATK A9 SE+

Pros

• Great low price for the overall package
• Good shape concept for larger hands
• Decent performance overall (per reviewer)

Cons

• Worst build quality in the comparison
• Click issue / fragility under force (tested)
• Heavy/tiring clicks, not for small hands
• Click/back ergonomics can fatigue due to higher rear

---

Comparisons made

The reviewer compared R1 vs X1 vs A9 across:

• Color options
• Price/value and sale behavior
• Finish/build durability (including a squeeze test)
• Wireless tech (MCU/near-link and the X1 delay issue)
• Sensor class (3311) → said to be equal
• Ergonomics and click feel (decision-maker)

---

Ratings / numerical scores

• No formal star score or numeric rating.
• Informal pricing references and claims:
  • X1/A9 ~ “around 5 tires”
  • V12+ down to ~38–40 or even ~300
  • Wireless tech claim: battery efficiency 3–6× (Huawei claim, not measured)

---

Concise verdict / recommendation

• Small hands + best overall feel: VXE R1 SE+
  • Smooth click/scroll, good grip coating, small-hand friendly.
• Viper-like shape + claw/fingertip (small–medium hands): ATK X1 SE
  • Expect slight delay and a firmer/rougher click.
• Avoid ATK A9 SE despite the price and larger-hand shape:
  • Reviewer reports worst durability/build and fatiguing/heavy clicks, plus a click/structure issue under pressure.

Overall: R1 SE+ and X1 SE are the two most recommended; A9 SE is the least trustworthy/least comfortable for many users.

---

Speaker views

• Primary reviewer: Focused on coating, build durability, tech delay, sensor parity, and especially click/ergonomics; clearly ranks sturdiness R1 > X1 > A9 and recommends R1/X1 over A9.
• Friend (secondary opinion): Criticized the X1 mainly on coating/grip experience (“quite a lot”).