Video summary
WarranTalks Ep 6 Kupas Tuntas Cara Cari Cuan Dari WT KGI Bersama Waran Hunter Indonesia!
Main summary
Key takeaways
Speakers / Roles
- Moderator (host): Mr. “Brepi” (name partially unclear in subtitles)
- Main speaker: Mr. Devandi Nasrul / Devani Nasrul — Founder, Waran Hunter Indonesia (WHI)
Disclaimers / Cautions Mentioned
- The content is education/information only, not a recommendation to buy or sell any shares/warrants.
- All investments involve risk, including loss of capital.
- Warrants can expire with zero value if they end up out of the money.
- Repeated emphasis to not confuse in-the-money vs out-of-the-money.
Key Market / Product Context: Corporate Warrants vs Structured Warrants (WT)
Underlying & Issuer
- Corporate warrants: Issued by a listed company (the parent stock issuer).
- Structured warrants (WT): Issued by securities members (structured warrant issuers).
Who Can Issue / Underlying Universe
- Historically, structured warrants’ underlying were restricted to stocks in IDX “Index 30”, then expanded to “Index 80” members.
- Structured warrant issuers mentioned:
- KGI Securities
- RB Securities
- Maybank Securities
- CGSI Securities
- Korea Investment Securities
- Index 80 constituents were described as having high liquidity, large market cap, and good fundamentals.
Time to Maturity
- Corporate warrants: typically 1–5 years
- Structured warrants (WT): typically 2 months to 24 months (~2 months–2 years)
Settlement / Redemption
- Corporate warrants: can be converted into parent shares (stock conversion possible).
- Structured warrants: cash settlement only if in-the-money; if out-of-the-money, investors may lose capital.
Underlying Price Formation
- Corporate warrants: pricing depends more directly on market forces.
- Structured warrants: feature a liquidity provider (LP) market-making mechanism with continuous bid/ask management (quasi bids/offers).
Mentioned Underlyings / Tickers / Instruments (Examples)
Most examples reference Indonesian equities; some ticker/code references appear partially unclear in subtitles.
Examples used throughout:
- Telkom
- ITMG (May 13 close around IDR 3,000; WT example “ITMG HDCZ6A” around 69)
- BBRI (multiple WT code examples; also used for leverage/theta-type examples)
- MDKA (call/put code reading examples)
- DSNG, TAPG (ARB/direct exposure examples; anomalies noted)
- BCA (volatility examples; some references may include BBCA codes)
- BRPT
- PTBA (dividend/GMS timing examples)
- ENRG
- BBIN (text unclear; treated as “BIN/Bevin” in some examples)
- “Bumi / UNCB?” (examples include Bumi; multiple code strings appear with identifiers like HD/CJ6A)
- SS / Pewon / PWON / Telkom / Index 80 sideways examples (some ticker text partially unclear)
Structured Warrant Code Formats (As Mentioned)
Example format
ABCD XX CZ 6A
Where:
- ABCD = underlying stock code
- XX = publisher/issuer code
- CZ = WT type and due month
- 6A / 7A etc. = maturity year + unique unit code
- C = Call, P = Put
Explicit code examples mentioned
- BBRI HD CQ 7A (KGI issuer example; call-type; maturity Aug 2027; unit code A)
- MDKA HD CP 6 H (call-type; maturity Oct 2026; unit code A)
- ITMG HDCZ6A
- Bumi HDCQ6A (matrix/theta decay example)
- BBCA HDCQ7A (inventory/sold-out type example)
- BRPT HDRCM6A
- PTBA HDCM6A (appears in dividend analysis context; text repeats)
- ENRG ADC K6A (IPO and in-the-money settlement example)
- Additional shorthand noted via subtitles:
- HD = KGI
- ZP = Maybank
- DR = RHB (Exact mapping shown/mentioned as issuer shorthand)
Indexes Mentioned
- IDX “Index 80” (core theme)
- IDX “Index 30” (prior underlying universe)
Key Numbers / Metrics (Examples)
Leverage / Gearing Effect (WT vs Parent)
- If the parent rises ~2%, WT could rise ~6% / 10% / tens of % (example ranges described).
- If the parent rises ~15%, WT could rise ~30% or up to ~80%+ (as described).
- Symmetry noted: if parent drops ~5%, WT could fall tens of %.
Cost / Lot Example (ITMG)
- ITMG closed ~IDR 3,000 (≈ IDR 2.3 million per lot).
- WT ITMG HDCZ6A price ~69 (≈ IDR 6,900 per lot).
- Narrative point: smaller premium can provide large exposure.
Auto Cash-Settlement Timing (In-the-money)
- Cash settlement distributed to RDN on the third trading day after the expiry/date of Kea.
- Example explanation: if there is surplus intrinsic value, QC/QP distributes automatically—no manual action required.
Theta / Time Decay Example (Bumi HDCQ6A style)
- Parent (Bumi) stays around ~240 over time.
- WT bid/quote decays due to theta:
- Apr 15, 2026: around 22
- May 18 (~1 month later): around 16
- Explanation: theta often accelerates near expiry, pushing WT lower even if parent is unchanged.
Dividend / Swing-Trading Numbers (PTBA)
- PTBA GMS timing: June 11, 2026 (annual GMS discussed).
- Rumor/claim: potential “jumbo dividend”.
- Dividend-related examples mentioned:
- 2024 dividend paid in 2025: about 330
- 2023 area: price around Rp 397
- 2022 “jumbo year”: PTBA could rise to 3,500–4,000, with dividends in the “1,000,000s” (units unclear)
- Execution math described:
- Estimate the probability of in-the-money using parent predicted price near expiry window.
- Use call intrinsic estimate:
(Settlement price - Exercise price) / Ratio(call)
In-the-money Calculation Examples (Generic)
- PTBA HDCM6A example
- Exercise price: 2417
- Ratio: shown as 8/8 (subtitles unclear, but ratio division emphasized)
- Intrinsic/settlement estimate example described:
(3,000 - 2,417) / ratio→ described as ~Rp 60–72
- ENRG in-the-money example
- IPO/offer price mentioned as 46
- At expiry (when in-the-money), WT replaced with about ~Rp 255
- Narrative profit described as “buy ~46 → replacement ~255” (direction: roughly 3–4x profit; some numbers inconsistent)
Methodology / Step-by-Step Frameworks Explicitly Shared
A) How to Read a WT Code
Break the code into components:
- Underlying stock code (e.g., BBRI, MDKA)
- Publisher/issuer code
- WT type: C = Call, P = Put
- Due month code: letters for months (example mappings given: F = Jan, J = Apr, Q = Aug)
- Maturity year code: 6 = 2026, 7 = 2027, etc.
- Unique unit code (A/B/C…)
B) How to Find Active WT (List for Selection)
Tools mentioned:
- webidx.id / IDX-linked structured warrant search
- warankgi.id (KGI-specific structured warrant search tool)
Workflow:
- Search by issuer/publisher (e.g., KGI)
- Filter active vs expired (explicit note: expired listings can appear in some lists)
C) WT Selection Workflow (WHI “Risk Mitigation” Process)
Main steps (order varied in narration):
- Prefer series with an available warrant matrix (only 3 publishers provide matrices; KGI included).
- Exclude series without a matrix (harder to estimate bids/asks / leverage).
- Remove WT whose trading end date is close (examples: delete Jun/Jul when choosing later months).
- Prefer WT with:
- Greater leverage effect (use matrix sensitivity/leverage columns)
- Risk managed by price tier:
- High risk: ~1–49
- Medium risk: ~50–99
- Low risk: 100+
- Avoid WT too close to expiry or with low remaining inventory held by LP/publisher.
- Use the matrix table as a “compass” to estimate bid/ask when the parent moves.
D) Daily Trading Framework (Intraday)
Target behavior:
- Choose underlying/WT in a “sideways but wide range” pattern within Index 80:
- “Not going anywhere” but with wide day-to-day volatility.
Structure:
- Identify parent recent low (e.g., low of the week range).
- Identify recent high (average/high of prior days).
- Use matrix to place orders near expected WT bid levels corresponding to parent low/high.
- Set profit target and stop loss at the start.
- Discipline: avoid holding overnight; cut losses quickly due to theta erosion.
E) Swing Trading Framework (Fundamentals + Corporate Actions)
Select an underlying with a known corporate catalyst:
- Dividends, stock splits, reissues, and other corporate actions.
Use timing around dividends:
- Buy WT anticipating parent will rise toward/around GMS/dividend dynamics:
- cumdate → ex-date
- Plan exit before key windows (example given: sell 1–5 days before dividend cumdate was described).
In-the-money estimation at expiry:
- Expected settlement price ≈ average parent price over last trading days near expiry window
- Compare to exercise price and divide by ratio
F) In-the-money / Out-of-the-money Estimation (Calls)
For call warrants:
- In-the-money condition described via:
- settlement price vs (exercise price / ratio)
Practical approach:
- Predict parent settlement price using the average of last 5 trading days near expiry as a proxy.
- Compute estimate:
(Settlement price - Exercise price) / Ratio
G) Theta Check Method (Publisher Calculator / “Theta” Section)
- Use publisher website:
- Look up theta for a specific WT code.
- Theta reflects expected daily time decay.
- Mention of a warrant calculator for holding horizon:
- Inputs include current bid/ask, parent price assumption, target calculation date (e.g., “hold until June 8, 2026”)
- Output: predicted bid/ask levels and rounding guidance
Risk Management / Cautions Highlighted (WT-specific)
1) Expiry risk (capital can be fully lost)
- If WT is out-of-the-money at expiry, investors may lose full capital.
- Emphasis: warrants behave differently from shares (shares can retain value longer even when temporarily down).
2) Time decay (theta)
- WT value declines over time even if the parent doesn’t move.
- Theta accelerates near expiry.
- Recommendation: prefer daily trading / short-term tactics; avoid overnight holding (especially around holidays).
3) Underlying trading halt / suspension risk
- If the parent stock is suspended, WT trading can stop/untradeable for the same duration.
4) Volatility risk
- Unexpected parent swings can rapidly change WT price.
5) Liquidity provider (LP) dependency risk
- If LP has issues:
- bid/ask may vanish temporarily
- selling becomes difficult even if price “should” move favorably
- Example anomalies:
- LP delay at open (09:00–09:01) and removal near close (~15:49)
- Market-making stops for half an hour to days due to system problems
- Inventory nearly depleted → deviation from matrix
6) Inventory / “low inventory” manipulation risk
- If LP/issuer-held WT is almost fully absorbed:
- quotes can become unreliable vs matrix
- WT price may deviate sharply (sometimes “soaring irregularly”)
- Publisher may add issuance, but limited:
- additional listing capped (speaker: max additional listing 2x; limit determined by TRMET)
- example mentioned: max 1 million lots for a specific warrant plan
7) Directional / ARB manipulation risk
- When parent enters directional / ARB conditions:
- WT can overshoot above the matrix
- then crash back after ARB/directional ends
- Examples: DSNG and TAPG
- Past large anomalies referenced (e.g., Gudang Garam tax direction example mentioned)
8) Avoid off-matrix warrants
- Strong recommendation: avoid WT whose movement is far from matrix expectations.
- If abnormal and not following matrix, it may be due to ARB, low inventory, or LP technical issues—avoid trading it.
9) No FOMO / crowd-chasing caution
- Avoid buying popular WT without understanding why price moved.
- Abnormal spikes may revert once matrix/conditions normalize.
Specific Platform / Data Sources Recommended
- IDX (idx.co.id): issuer information disclosure; used to check inventory absorption and quote stability
- webidx.id
- warankgi.id (KGI structured warrant tool)
- Publisher websites for:
- warrant matrix
- theta
- warrant calculator
Presenter / Source List (As Stated in Subtitles)
- Mr. Devandi Nasrul / Devani Nasrul — Founder, Waran Hunter Indonesia (WHI)
- Mr. Brepi / Brevi — Moderator (KGI Sekuritas Indonesia webinar host/moderator)
- KGI Sekuritas Indonesia — Organizer (structured products / equity derivatives division mentioned)