Bonatua: Berarti Daftar Riwayat Hidup Dia Bohong! | AKIP tvOne

Summary

During discussion of the PTUN case over Gibran Rakabuming Raka’s education-equivalency certificate, his legal representative, Adil, said Gibran had hoped to attend the hearing but might be occupied with official duties.

The defense brought education documents to court and showed them on camera, while noting that the case was still at the response stage—not yet the formal evidence stage. The documents included school records, an attendance certificate from UTS Insearch stating that Gibran completed 90% of its program, and qualifications from MDIS, including an advanced diploma and a bachelor’s degree.

Adil said the records were not new and had been made public before. He argued that the case concerns whether the 2019 equivalency certificate was legally issued, not whether Gibran was eligible to run in an election. He also maintained that the attendance certificate, together with other records, supports Gibran’s education history and relates to his transfer between schools.

Bona disputed that interpretation. He argued that the regulation on equivalency refers to a diploma or certificate of graduation, not merely proof of attendance. In his view, the UTS document should not have been used as the basis for the equivalency certificate, and the PTUN should cancel it.

Bona also argued that treating the MDIS qualification as equivalent to high-school education could raise questions about Gibran’s résumé for his mayoral candidacy. Adil responded that election-related questions were outside the scope of the case.

The discussion ended without a ruling. Both sides said further evidence and arguments would be addressed in court.

Presenters and contributors: The presenter (not identified in the subtitles), Adil, and Bona/Bonatua.