Video summary

Tanie Granie 🎮 Składamy komputer do gier za 700 zł z GTX 1660 Ti

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

A very low-budget gaming PC built around an Intel Core i5 (7th gen class, described as i5-7500), 16 GB DDR4, an NVMe PCIe Gen 3 SSD (M.2 2280, ~256 GB), and a GeForce GTX 1660 Ti (6 GB VRAM), assembled on a Fujitsu “Primo P75 E90 Plus” small office base.


Key specs / features mentioned

  • CPU: Quad-core i5 7500 class, 65W TDP, ~3.3–3.8 GHz turbo (one core) / ~3.6 GHz all-core
  • RAM: 16 GB (2x8 GB) DDR4 2400 MHz, dual-channel (slots 2 and 4)
  • Storage: M.2 NVMe 2280; PCIe Gen 3 (even if the drive may be PCIe Gen 4 capable, bandwidth reduced to Gen 3). Capacity mentioned mainly as 256 GB
  • GPU: GeForce GTX 1660 Ti 6 GB (single-fan “cheapest” Gainward model mentioned), 2019, no RT cores / no tensor
  • Power supply: 250W 80+ Gold Fujitsu PSU (efficiency claimed 90–92%; brief surge up to ~280W for 20 seconds)
  • TPM support: TPM 2.0/2.2 mentioned so Windows 11 works; Windows license included (Windows 10 key compatible with 11)
  • Case / size: Very compact office chassis; ~30 cm deep, business/ITX-like footprint
  • I/O (front): 2x USB 3.0 and 1x USB-C 3.1 Gen 1, all 5 Gbit/s
  • GPU power connection: Uses a 2x SATA to 8-pin adapter (not ideal), but justified because the card only needs ~120W and the PCIe slot contributes 75W

Build cost (explicit)

  • Base (Fujitsu Primo P75 E90 Plus): PLN 199 (without drives/RAM)
  • RAM (2x8 GB DDR4 Samsung): PLN 99
  • NVMe SSD (256 GB): PLN 69 (used example)
  • GTX 1660 Ti: PLN 350
  • Total: PLN 717 (video also claims the “computer for ~700 PLN” including Windows)

User experience / performance impressions

Everyday use

  • Very responsive due to NVMe SSD
  • Smooth media playback: YouTube works in 4K / 60fps
  • Quiet system: “almost inaudible without load”

Power / thermals

  • Detected stable 2400 MHz RAM and NVMe in BIOS
  • GPU temperatures around ~70°C in the small case after overclocking/boosting

Gaming performance (benchmarks given)

All testing described in Full HD (mostly):

  • Doom Eternal

    • Low settings (CPU ~100% load): avg >160 FPS, 1% low >120
    • Ultra settings: avg ~115 FPS, power around ~180W
  • Cyberpunk 2077 (standard raster, low/medium)

    • Avg around ~75 FPS on low; 1% low ~45
    • Note: CPU ~near 100% load; memory limitation discussed (6GB VRAM)
  • Spider-Man: Miles Morales (native low preset)

    • Avg ~85 FPS, 1% low ~40
    • Medium: avg ~67 FPS; “low” ~31% mentioned (wording implies significant drop)
    • GPU temps ~70°C
  • GTA V

    • Stable on Medium
    • CPU is the bottleneck; higher presets reduce 1% low below 30
    • Avg ~90 FPS, 1% low ~61
  • Fortnite (competitive-ish approach)

    • With V-Sync / frame limit: avg ~60 FPS, 1% low ~40
    • V-Sync off: FPS average can rise (~150 FPS) but 1% low drops (~30 FPS)
  • CS2

    • Low, training (Mirage): stable around ~60 FPS on 1% low map test; avg up to ~160 FPS
    • Conclusion: “Absolutely yes” for CS at Full HD low
  • Minecraft (native Full HD Microsoft Store version)

    • Avg around ~100 FPS, 1% low ~60
    • CPU and GPU load appear balanced; no restarts after long testing

Main pros (unique points)

  • Extremely low total price (~PLN 700–717) while still playing many games comfortably
  • Includes Windows 11-capable setup via TPM and a included key/license
  • NVMe Gen 3 SSD makes the PC snappy/responsive
  • Low noise in daily use
  • 80+ Gold 250W PSU with enough headroom for stress testing:
    • Stress test draw: ~180–200W
    • Overclocked/power-limited scenario: ~210–215W (still within PSU effectiveness range mentioned)
  • Good cooling behavior for GTX 1660 Ti (~70°C range)
  • Demonstrated Full HD gaming across many titles with specific FPS targets

Main cons / limitations (unique points)

  • CPU bottleneck in many games (often near 100% CPU load), limiting GPU performance
  • GPU VRAM limitation (6 GB) affecting titles/settings; may require reliance on lower settings (and avoid upscalers in Full HD)
  • Small office PSU / cable constraints:
    • GPU power uses a SATA-to-8-pin adapter, not ideal, and the video explicitly warns not to do this with much more powerful GPUs
  • SSD was PCIe Gen 3 capped, depending on drive/base compatibility (still “decent speeds”)
  • Warning: don’t buy “old used corpses” drives (example SSD only worked for a few hours)

Comparisons / alternatives mentioned

  • Compared GTX 1660 Ti efficiency vs other GPUs in the sub-PLN 400 range:
    • No real alternatives for that budget
    • 1660 Ti uses close to GTX 1060 power but is significantly faster
    • Radeon RX 570/580 described as a big gap (esp. peak behavior)
    • GTX 1080 is ~10% faster on average but consumes ~50W more
    • GTX 1660 Ti has slightly lower power appetite than 1660 Super (as stated)
  • Suggested a different build as an alternative for a higher budget:
    • ~PLN 4,000 system with RX 960 XT + 16 GB VRAM (from another video)

Overall verdict / recommendation

A budget “cheap gaming” PC built on an office Fujitsu base that works very well for Full HD gaming (many titles run smoothly, often near or above 60 FPS), while the CPU is the main limiter and the GTX 1660 Ti’s 6 GB VRAM restricts higher settings in newer games. Power and thermals appear acceptable thanks to the 250W 80+ Gold PSU.

Recommended for players who want maximum performance-per-zloty at Full HD with medium/low (sometimes ultra) settings and are okay with CPU-limited scenarios.


Speakers / views

Only one main speaker (single narration) is evident throughout the subtitles; no separate speaker perspectives were clearly indicated.

Original video