Video summary
FP&A vs Investment Banking Explained | Salary | Work Life | Skills & Career Path Comparison
Main summary
Key takeaways
Summary (Finance-career focus: FP&A vs Investment Banking)
The video compares Financial Planning & Analysis (FP&A) and Investment Banking (IB) across day-to-day work, required skills, compensation structure, work-life balance, career progression, stress/job security, and exit opportunities.
Core roles & responsibilities
FP&A (internal finance function; internal company-facing)
- Supports a company’s budgeting and forecasting
- Performs variance analysis
- Builds MIS, dashboards, and management reporting
- Partners with business divisions (e.g., meetings with HR/marketing/business unit heads)
- Conducts financial modeling and updates financial insights for management decision-making
- Work is tied to company-specific business model understanding and execution of internal plans
Investment Banking (client-facing advisory; deal-driven)
- Works in client advisory roles and deal pitching
- Handles M&A, IPO, and debt fund raising
- Uses financial modeling techniques including DCF and LBO
- Creates pitch books and supports deal execution
- Work spans multiple clients/companies; continuously reads/understands client targets and sectors
- Characterized by high-pressure timelines and fast-changing tasks
- Constant client communication; “live on phone/laptop” availability is implied
Compensation: structure, levels, and key numbers (India + US mention)
Indicative pay (India, as stated)
- Freshers (FP&A): 5–8 LPA
- Freshers (Investment Banking): ₹10–20 lakh, potentially up to ₹25–30 lakh
- As careers progress, the gap reduces (IB remains higher but differential narrows)
Bonus / variable pay (explicit emphasis)
- IB: variable pay/bonus is described as a major component; total compensation can become “insane” and substantially higher than other finance roles.
- FP&A: includes some variable pay/bonus, plus potential ESOPs/RSUs, increments, and benefits (PF, gratuity).
US note
- For those working in the US, salaries are mentioned as dollar-denominated, with the video suggesting compensation can go above “100” (exact unit not clarified).
Career-stage timeline for reaching high packages
- The video claims it takes about 5–7 years for IB to reach an “equivalent” strong package level (CFO/IB grades context mentioned).
- It also says achieving comparable income via FP&A typically takes “many times longer” (no precise time given beyond that framing).
Work-life balance & lifestyle expectations
FP&A
- Slightly less working hours; more standardized schedule
- Pressure peaks around:
- month-end
- quarter-end
- budget season
- Weekends mostly protected (as described)
- Mentions work-from-home flexibility
- Predictable calendar cycle: tasks are known in advance
Investment Banking
- Deal-driven workload; pressure rises when deal flow is high
- All-nighters described as routine; weekend work can occur
- Availability expectations: constant email/phone/laptop presence
- Remote work described as not possible in typical IB (because in-person client meetings/pitches are required)
- Frequent travel due to client/location changes
Skills & tools mentioned
Shared foundation
- Excel and financial modeling (said to be required for finance broadly)
- Core finance understanding before choosing a path
FP&A-specific skills
- ERP tools understanding
- Power BI for dashboards (“Power BI table” mentioned)
- Variance and trend analysis
- Stakeholder communication
- Business acumen and strategic insight/partnering
Investment Banking skills
- Strong grip on modeling: DCF, LBO
- References to:
- COMPS (implied by “COMMS”)
- M&A (explicit)
- Pitch books
- Accounting and valuation
- Client relationship management
- Tools mentioned: Bloomberg and FactSet
- Extreme attention to detail (no room for error emphasized)
Career ladder & progression
FP&A ladder (as stated)
- Analyst → Senior Analyst → Manager → Director / VP → potentially CFO
Investment Banking ladder (as stated)
- Analyst → Associate → VP → Director → MD (as listed)
The video also claims:
- In FP&A, you build long-term strategic contribution within one company
- In IB, you build deal/network credibility that accelerates later moves
Job security, stress, and macro sensitivity (explicit caution)
- FP&A: described as more stable and job security is high; stress is “moderate”
- IB: described as more stressful and market dependent
- Example caution: during a recession with “no deals,” layoffs can be seen in IB
Methodology / frameworks explicitly referenced
The video does not present a step-by-step investment methodology or asset allocation framework. However, it explicitly references valuation/modeling frameworks used in IB:
- DCF (Discounted Cash Flow)
- LBO (Leveraged Buyout)
- COMPS (referenced as “COMMS”)
- Pitch book / deal execution workflow (described at a high level, not as a numbered process)
Explicit recommendations / cautions (career decision guidance)
- Do not decide based only on salary.
- Choose based on:
- whether you want work-life balance
- job stability
- interest in internal strategic work (FP&A) vs client/deal work (IB)
- ability to handle extreme pressure and constant availability (IB)
- Video positions IB as a “sprint, not a marathon”:
- enter, build credibility/network, then potentially switch after a few years (mentions 3–4 years and “2–3 years” as typical switching time ranges)
Exit opportunities / “myths” addressed
Myths
- “IB is the only real finance career” → FP&A is presented as strategic, not just back-office.
- “FP&A is boring (Excel all day)” → FP&A is said to involve business partnering, forecasting, presentations, and even AI integration.
- “IB pay per hour is always higher” → video claims that when normalized for hours, IB per-hour may be lower than FP&A at analyst level.
- “FP&A has no exit opportunities” → FP&A is said to lead to corporate development, expansion/M&A roles, startup CFO roles, and VC/ops pathways.
- “IB is the only way to PE/VC” → VC/growth equity firms are said to recruit from FP&A and startup finance talent too.
Disclaimers / disclosures
- No explicit “not financial advice” or investing disclosure is included; content is career guidance rather than financial product advice.
Tick ers / assets / instruments mentioned
- No specific public tickers (e.g., stocks/ETFs) or macro market instruments (bonds/commodities) are named.
Presenters / sources
- Kuldip Sharma (host/presenter)
- Channel/brand referenced: PW Skki Finance (credited as the welcome context)