Now Our Marketing Clients Are Worth $12k/year

Business strategy & positioning (the “identity shift”)

• Shift the agency value proposition from “website production/designer” to business growth outcomes:

  • Improve visibility
  • Drive lead generation
  • Increase lead conversion
  • Build customer loyalty / repeat business
  • (Not just site aesthetics)

• Target a market mismatch:

  • Many web designers are selling “websites.”
  • Many local business owners actually need help with growth mechanics (traffic, conversions, repeat customers).
  • These owners often default to cheap ~$500–$500-ish website providers and/or informal builders.

• Core thesis: even if a better website converts better, it’s often not enough without traffic and nurturing—so the website alone isn’t the client’s primary problem.

---

Market/offer details (what they actually sell)

• Annual contract value (KPIs / pricing targets):

  • Minimum: $5,000/year
  • Top end: ~$20,000/year
  • Average: ~$12,000/year (stated as annual numbers)
  • They note these are often paid monthly, though framed as annual KPIs.

• Outcome-based framing (“worth $12k/year”):

  • Clients experience rapid business impact rather than “pretty site” deliverables.

---

Concrete example / case study

Kitchen & bath remodeling client (Williamsburg)

• Initial problem:

  • Client relocated and rebranded.
  • Nobody could find the new business name/location.
  • The client believed they were about to go out of business.

• After connecting with the agency:

  • Within < 2 months, they moved from “in trouble” to hiring people.

• Reported results (that week/message period):

  • 3 kitchen & bath projects landed

• Deal size context:

  • Remodel projects are described as ~$50,000 to $150,000 each.

Interpretation / actionable takeaway: Position the agency as fixing business growth bottlenecks (discovery + lead flow), not just website production.

---

Their growth/operations “playbook” (how they run engagements)

They describe operating like a results-driven “quarterback” system and using monthly analytics to decide next steps.

• Engagement loop / operating system:

  • Run 3 growth engines (mentioned, but not enumerated here)
  • End-of-month measurement:
    • Review traffic volume
    • Review conversion rate on the site
    • Review traffic sources
  • Data-driven next step:
    • Decide what to do next based on the results
    • Execute the next cycle

• Quarterback vs. order-taking model (organizational tactic):

  • Old model: designer takes direction → change requests pile up → overwhelm + scope creep (“free work,” low payoff)
  • New model: agency leads the plan (“calls plays”) → client buys in because the focus is results (more leads/projects), not subjective design preferences

---

Lead generation strategy (prospecting + qualification)

• Earlier lead-gen tactic (implied, not ideal):

  • Search Google Maps for businesses missing website links
  • Call them and offer a website
  • Claim: they could get “a ton of leads”

• Qualification insight (what breaks the funnel):

  • Those businesses often won’t pay $5k–$20k/year because their budget mindset skews to cheap DIY-ish or low-cost solutions.
  • The mismatch is between:
    • Designers selling “websites”
    • Owners who want growth mechanics

---

Sales/marketing messaging: what to emphasize

• Replace “website” language with growth outcomes:

  • Improve Google Business Profile
  • Improve Facebook/social outreach
  • Build an email list
  • Systematically generate leads and convert them into clients

• Brand promise / category positioning:

  “The guy who helps you grow beyond word-of-mouth when you’re ready to scale.”

---

Metrics & business impact framing (selling ROI)

• Capacity/booking question (sales discovery):

  • Ask:

    “If nothing changed, and you just got more clients, how close to fully booked are you?”

  • Reported pattern: most say about half booked

  • Implication: they can take ~2x more business without hiring

• Revenue impact estimate (ROI KPI):

  • They infer that doubling capacity could mean >$100,000/year additional revenue
  • This supports charging higher-value service pricing vs. low-cost website deals

---

Frameworks / playbooks mentioned or implied

• No formal named framework (e.g., SWOT/OKRs), but there is a clear process:
  • Monthly analytics + iterative improvement loop (measure → decide → act)
  • Quarterback model (agency drives the plan; client participates)
  • ROI/capacity-based selling (use booking capacity to infer revenue upside)

---

Actionable recommendations (as stated)

• Build an offer and outreach narrative anchored on:

  • Visibility
  • Lead nurturing
  • Conversion
  • Loyalty

• Stop leading with:

  • “I build websites”

• Re-position as:

  • the partner who helps the business stop “going out of business” and start hiring/growing

• Use discovery questions to prevent mismatch and avoid hard selling:

  • Ask about maximum intake capacity (near fully booked vs. half)
  • Tie potential upside to revenue (example justification lands at $100k+)

---

Presenter / source

• Presenter: Lee Blue
  • Web agency operator
  • Mentor to web designers
  • Author of a referenced book about the “top 10 most profitable niches”