Video summary
BersandarPadaStandar7 : Let's Make Metadata
Main summary
Key takeaways
Main ideas, concepts, and lessons
-
Metadata is essential for geospatial data
- Metadata is “data about data” describing spatial resources so they can be found, used, analyzed, searched, and managed.
- It improves data dissemination and reuse, helps users judge whether data matches their needs, and enables international sharing using standardized language/structure.
-
Indonesia’s policy direction: “One Data Indonesia” / “One Map”
- Standardized metadata supports the government’s principle of one data and helps build a quality geospatial information ecosystem.
-
Indonesia mandates standardized geospatial metadata (BIG / Peraturan)
- The webinar focuses on preparing metadata according to BIG Regulation No. 3 of 2023, including later development of the BIG Metadata Editor to implement those standards.
- The metadata standard is built from a regulatory framework:
- Law No. 4 (2011)
- Presidential regulations
- BIG regulations (including Perbig 3/2023 and related SNI-based standards)
-
Metadata standards are based on the ISO 19115 family + encoded XML standards
- Indonesia’s SNI profiles adapt ISO metadata structure, including:
- SNI 8843 (Indonesia profile of ISO metadata framework; metadata structure)
- Additional SNI/ISO parts for acquisition/process, quality, and encoding (XML)
- Metadata must be encoded in a computer-readable format (XML) to be published and harvested by geoportals.
- Indonesia’s SNI profiles adapt ISO metadata structure, including:
-
A typical “metadata lifecycle” parallels the geospatial data lifecycle
- Geospatial information (IG) production stages: planning → acquisition/collection → processing → storage/distribution → use
- Metadata is prepared across these stages, with responsibility split among roles like:
- Data producers (planning/production fields, quality-related inputs)
- Data guardians (final quality/dissemination fields before public access)
-
The Indonesian metadata profile organizes information into “13 packages/classes”
- At a high level, the profile includes repeating core concepts such as:
- Identifiers (with authority/codes and code space scope)
- MD scope (what entity the metadata describes: dataset, feature type, etc.)
- Spatial/temporal coverage and references
- Citation and responsibility
- Content information (abstract, status, resolution, topic categories, keywords)
- Coverage / extent description
- Data lineage
- Data quality information (quality measure + evaluation method + results)
- At a high level, the profile includes repeating core concepts such as:
-
Quality results must include both “how measured” and “what result”
- Quality information should express:
- Quantitative or qualitative results
- Evaluation method and reference/criteria
- Whether measured results conform to standards
- Quality information should express:
-
Why a metadata editor is needed
- Many existing metadata implementations are incomplete or inconsistent when hand-coded (e.g., Notepad/Excel issues like wrong datatypes, wrong placements, wrong code list values).
- The BIG Metadata Editor (BigM) is intended to:
- Create metadata from scratch
- Convert older XML formats to the newer standard
- Validate structure and content before export
Methodology / workflow steps taught (detailed)
A) Create or convert metadata using Big Metadata Editor (BigM)
Access
- Web-based; no installation required
- No login required for the web editor (an account may be needed later for SSO integrations)
Choose mode
- Create new metadata
- Start with an empty form
- Import XML
- Import from a local XML file, or
- Import via a repository catalog (explained as being handled in a later session)
Conversion
- If the XML uses an older metadata encoding format, BigM detects it and converts automatically.
- Example: conversion from older ISO metadata XML versions to the newer SNI/ISO 19115 D3-based encoding
Validation during editing
BigM provides:
- Completeness/progress indicators for packages/classes
- Validation instructions for required fields
- Validation checking for:
- Correct namespace
- Correct package/element placement
- Correct data types (e.g., character string vs integer)
- Correct code list values (dropdown-constrained values must match ISO/SNI lists)
Editing approach
- Fill “blank/invalid” fields until packages show as complete
- Use in-editor search to jump to elements
- Use the XML panel to confirm the element uses the right code list/value type
Metadata identifier requirement
- The metadata identifier must be unique so it can link geospatial data with metadata in the geoportal
- Example naming pattern idea (conceptual):
[element] [scale] [region] [year](to keep it comprehensive and unique)
Export
- After completing required elements (and as much optional/conditional content as possible), export/download XML
- The resulting XML is then used for publication
B) Publish and expose metadata through geoportals / national services (CSW harvesting model)
Publish concept
- Metadata is stored in a catalog server so geoportals can discover it
- Spatial services and metadata services are paired:
- Metadata describes datasets and links to service endpoints
CSW (Catalog Service for the Web) requirements
- Geoportal publishing/discovery uses CSW endpoints
- Goal: interoperability, discoverability, and reuse for connected national nodes
Key CSW operations
- Configure and verify support for operations such as:
- GetCapabilities
- GetRecords / GetRecordById (as referenced in the session)
Harvesting & security considerations
- Harvesting must be carefully configured to avoid creating security loopholes
- Restrict access to allowed IPs/domains where relevant
Verification testing
- Test the CSW endpoint using browser/URL patterns (examples referenced such as
/CSW,/catalog/csw, etc.) - Confirm the CSW supports the required XML metadata profile/schema (e.g., MDB/ISO 19115 D3)
- If the schema/profile is not supported, it may still be readable but may require conversion/compatibility handling
- Ensure the CSW endpoint is reachable
- If geoportals are overly secure and block harvesting, discovery/publishing is ineffective
Publishing through Palapa (where applicable)
- After XML is produced/exported:
- Upload or paste XML into Palapa’s publication interface
- Ensure metadata links distribution services via the online resource URL
- Example: WMS endpoint + workspace/layer name
- Replace placeholders like
localhostwith the real domain and service path
Result
- Once published and harvested, metadata becomes discoverable via the geoportal ecosystem and can propagate to national-level portals
C) Guidance given during Q&A (practical constraints)
Do you need 100% completion?
- The session indicates:
- Mandatory vs optional/conditional items are governed by the SNI profile
- The editor enforces mandatory fields via validation (XML export may be blocked if mandatory items are missing)
- The progress indicator is recommended to be filled as completely as possible, but publication may be staged if some elements are not yet available
If metadata already exists
- It may require reformatting/conversion
- Example: conversion from older ISO 19139 to newer ISO 19115 D3 encoding/profile
- BigM can assist with converting older XML formats
Open-source metadata tools
- Tool choice is less important than standards compliance
- Tools must produce metadata conforming to the mandated SNI/ISO profiles
Non-spatial datasets
- Standards can technically apply beyond spatial data, but regulatory applicability may differ
- There may be separate rules for statistical/non-geospatial domains
Speakers / sources featured (as named in the subtitles)
Speakers (identified by name/titles in the subtitles)
- Mr. Abdul Rasid — Director of Geospatial Information Technology and Standards (welcoming/opening)
- Mr. Abdul Rasyid / Abdur Rasyid — appears in the opening sequence (same context as the welcome; likely the same official)
- Ms. Ratih — moderator/host (named repeatedly)
- Mr. Ibnu Sofyan — Deputy for Geospatial Information Infrastructure (opening speech)
- Mr. Budi Herbroho / Budi Heri / Budi Herbroho — Young Expert Mapping Surveyor at BIG (metadata standards session)
- Mas Bagus Wiratmoko — introduces Big Metadata Editor practice session
- Mr. Muhammad Hasanudin Yusa — metadata publication and CSW session
- Mr. Geri / Mas Geri — quiz moderator/host
- Mr. Sisa (Mr. Sisa …) — answers a question about BigM accounts/no-login
- Mr. Muzakir Ahmadi — participant questioner (South Sumatra)
- Mr. Novi Adi — participant questioner (KKP/fisheries-related question)
- Mr. Ardiansah — participant questioner (Anambas Islands; governance/staging needs)
- Mr. Adiant / other Anambas respondent — appears in the Q&A flow
- Mr. Aldi / Andrian / Ardiansyah — quiz winners mentioned near the end
- Mr. Aldi — also appears in the winner confirmation segment
Institutional / regulatory sources referenced
- BIG (Badan Informasi Geospasial / Geospatial Information Agency)
- BIG Regulation No. 3 of 2023
- Perbig 3 of 2025 — referenced as timeline/updates about mandatory SNI metadata
- Law No. 4 of 2011 (especially Article 49 paragraph 2)
- Presidential Regulations referenced (including Perpres 27/2014 and Prespres 39/2019)
- SNI standards referenced
- SNI 8843 and related parts
- SNI ISO 19115 D2/D3 (acquisition/process and encoding)
- ISO 19157 (data quality)
- Additional ISO updates mentioned (e.g., consolidation updates related to 19157)
- ISO base concepts
- Metadata as information about resources; ISO 19115 family
Platforms/services referenced
- BIG Metadata Editor (BigM)
- Palapa Geoportal
- INA Geoportal / TanahAir portal (tanahir.indonesia.go.id referenced)
- CSW (Catalog Service for Web)
- OGC services referenced: WMS, WFS, WCS, WMTS
- Geoserver / workspace layer naming referenced
- QGIS (referenced in Q&A)
- ArGIS / ArcGIS Pro (commercial metadata editor example)
- MD Editor / CATMD Edit (regional tool referenced in Q&A)
- Slido (used for questions)