Video summary

TEDxLondon - Ewan McIntosh

Main summary

Key takeaways

Educational

Main ideas, concepts, and lessons

  • Problem-solving skills in schools are being built on the wrong assumption

    • Many education systems promote problem-based learning, but the speaker argues they often focus on pseudo problems—problems created by teachers or assigned by the curriculum.
    • This approach can produce students who solve fake or irrelevant problems instead of becoming people who can find real problems in the world.
  • The missing educational goal: “problem-finders”

    • The core claim is that society needs a generation of problem finders—young people who:
      • Identify problems that actually matter,
      • Work with peers to tackle them,
      • Develop the motivation and capability to start solving problems found in their communities and world.
  • Evidence/observations from the speaker’s experiences

    • From work in media, venture capitalism, and digital companies:
      • The speaker saw ~3,000 ideas/pitches, with only ~30 succeeding, suggesting a very low success rate (~1%) even among highly creative people.
    • From teaching and advising perspectives:
      • The speaker observed that education systems repeatedly emphasize the wrong part of problem-based learning—focusing on receiving problems rather than finding them.
  • Why pseudo-problems are harmful

    • Students’ and teachers’ expectations reinforce a model where:
      • Teachers provide problems,
      • Students respond with work designed to satisfy school tasks,
      • The result can be impressive but not meaningful—“ingenious answers to stupid problems that don’t matter.”
  • Reframing learning: more learner-driven work

    • The speaker advocates:
      • Divergent thinking (generating many possible directions/ideas),
      • Plus some convergent thinking at the end to refine ideas into real outcomes.
    • The learning structure is described as design-thinking-like, with teachers reducing micromanagement so students do more of the intellectual work.

Methodology / instructional approach (as described)

  • Use a design-thinking-inspired learning flow

    • Teacher immersion phase (before students get a problem)

      • The teacher explores and narrows down possible areas of study.
      • The teacher selects a set of real problems students could investigate (instead of handing students one pre-made pseudo problem).
    • Student problem acquisition phase

      • Students take ownership of the problem (with emphasis on enabling students to find or choose problems).
      • Students generate ideas for solutions.
    • Prototyping phase

      • Students build or test solutions, such as:
        • Writing essays,
        • Making films,
        • Creating podcasts,
        • Publishing blogs.
    • Feedback phase

      • The teacher provides feedback near the end.
      • The speaker criticizes feedback being delayed until exams or being overly dependent on test outcomes.
  • Shift responsibility

    • The speaker explicitly wants:
      • Children doing the hard work of learning, not teachers.
      • More divergent thinking in the curriculum, enabled by letting students perform the intellectual labor teachers typically do.

Example used to illustrate the approach (TEDx with children)

  • A practical implementation with young students

    • The speaker shared TED Talks with children in Sunderland (UK).
    • The children responded immediately: “We’re doing that.”
  • Key implementation rule

    • Teachers were not allowed to “spoon-feed” problems.
    • The children created their own TEDx talks by deciding what to focus on.
  • Outcomes / topics

    • Children proposed and investigated questions such as:
      • Do animals talk?
      • Do babies have a secret language?
      • Which cancer should be cured first?
      • Why do people need to get sick?
  • What the speaker highlights

    • Visible enthusiasm and peer encouragement are presented as evidence of stronger engagement.

Call to action / pledge

  • Create a “problem-finding curriculum” at scale
    • The speaker proposes a pledge starting this week and before Christmas:
      • Engage 10,000 learners in a problem-finding curriculum.
    • Support is requested from:
      • Teachers,
      • School district leaders,
      • Politicians.

Closing anecdote (what problem-finding does to people)

  • A summer incident illustrates deep ownership
    • Inspired by the idea “You give us the problems, and we’ll solve them,” students:
      • Began creating and finding problems throughout the school year and into summer vacation.
    • When they received a computer to solve problems:
      • A child broke into the school during summer to reprogram the computer so it could solve the problems the child had found.
    • The speaker interprets this as proof that problem-finding changes people—toward ownership, agency, and persistence.

Speakers / sources featured (explicitly mentioned)

  • Ewan McIntosh (TEDx speaker)
  • Simon Breakspear (mentioned; referenced as working on finding unsolved problems; also doing a PhD)
  • Alan November (educator; described running a community problem-solving class)
  • D school (source of the “design thinking kind of structure” reference; i.e., Stanford d.school)

Original video