Элита ВСУ СДАЛАСЬ⚠️Много ТРУПОВ бойцы ВСУ ОКРУЖЕНЫ⚔️ | Максим Гольдарб

Overview

The video is presented as commentary and analysis by Maxim Goldar regarding:

• Ukraine’s war effort and escalation risks
• Alleged internal repression within Ukraine
• International political constraints affecting sanctions and aid

---

Key Points and Arguments

Zelensky’s claims about air defense vs. continued strikes

The discussion opens with Zelensky’s statement that there is “nothing to shoot down ballistic missiles with,” while the speaker argues that strikes continue regardless—citing effects tied to the Sea of Azov, including drone activity and broader escalation dynamics.

---

Strategic pressure: closure/blockage around the Kerch Strait

The speaker claims there is a broader operational trend of tightening control over access routes, including closing the passage through the Kerch Strait. This is framed as limiting an “exit” from the Don area toward the Sea of Azov.

---

Political elite tensions: “elites in the Kremlin” and signals from China

• The speaker says Zelensky believes some Russian elites may want to stop the war and that there are communications with them.
• He highlights a Chinese position against nuclear weapon use, interpreting it as aimed at maintaining plausible deniability (“they say this now so later they can disown it”).
• He suggests that leaders (implicitly Putin/Lavrov) may be signaling nuclear options under strategic pressure.
• He argues that China’s stance does not necessarily indicate a firm alignment “against Russia.”

---

Trump/NATO summit dynamics and why the speaker thinks Ukraine aid is not a priority

The speaker criticizes Trump for inconsistent promises and argues that U.S. support is driven more by deal-making and personal/political calculations than by Ukraine’s operational needs.

He further claims that Trump’s ability to expand aid will be limited by:

• U.S. domestic constraints
• Republican infighting and “America First” factions
• Potential pressure from impeachment-related dynamics

In this view, Ukraine will not be a top priority, as his focus shifts to other international crises.

---

Ukraine’s internal repression and “controlled propaganda”

A significant portion focuses on alleged authoritarian control inside Ukraine:

• The speaker cites Lviv events as evidence of harsh actions against dissenters (described as TCC-linked enforcement/punishers), arguing these actions aim to intimidate the population.
• He argues the media environment is controlled (“silence” and restrictions on topics), and that journalists avoid certain questions.
• He asserts Zelensky’s early approach prioritized propaganda over independent media, which he says helped enable a suppression system.

---

Corruption and the alleged criminal nature of governance

The speaker strongly asserts that the “ruling regime” is run like a criminal organization, referencing investigations (including NABU mentions) and claiming American and European intelligence/legal systems are examining misuse of aid funds.

He describes a “pyramid/food pyramid” model for money acquisition and distribution, attributing it to Zelensky’s security/punitive structures, and argues that Western services increasingly view internal governance as corrupt and criminal.

---

Military assessments: no “turning points,” and “grey zone” expansion

The speaker claims official Ukrainian claims of progress are contradicted by military commentary:

• He says Zaluzhny denies there is a basis for “turning points” or progress.
• He argues that Syrsky acknowledges a growing “grey zone” closer to northern cities (Kharkiv/Sumy/Kyiv), implying evacuation pressures and battlefield worsening.
• He also uses examples—including villages far from visible fighting—to argue that “frontline” realities extend beyond where combat is most noticeable.

---

Expected future war dynamics (shelling, mobilization, and elections timing)

The speaker forecasts:

• Increased shelling of Ukrainian cities in summer
• Potential changes around Russian Duma elections
• A strategy of producing “victories” (offensives, fortress advances, or pressure/blocking affecting Odessa) to shape public opinion before elections
• Intensified mobilization after the election period
• A more serious autumn offensive unless peace occurs

---

Iran escalation and global economic consequences

The speaker connects the Iran situation to potential indirect effects on Ukraine:

• He argues Trump’s position toward Iran is constrained.
• He suggests escalation benefits certain geopolitical actors (implying Israel gains from U.S. involvement).
• He claims renewed crisis risk could trigger fuel/strait disruptions and global economic shocks, affecting shipping lanes and tanker routes—ultimately influencing Western populations and politics.
• He argues oil/gas disruptions create winners (oil corporations/traders) while ordinary citizens bear the costs.

---

Ukraine’s economic collapse and dependence on external funding

The speaker argues Ukraine effectively lacks a functioning national economy:

• reliance on printed or donor-linked currency flows
• major industries/strategic assets controlled by oligarchic/elite groups
• diversion of funds away from productive rebuilding into war, patronage, and procurement/corruption cycles

He points to inflation/devaluation pressures and argues that donor dollars/euros preserve currency stability more than they restore domestic economic production.

---

Overall conclusion: war continuation, regime fear, and likely reduced U.S. support

The speaker concludes that the current Ukrainian regime is focused on:

• control and repression
• managing and directing external aid fund flows

He suggests Trump will not prioritize Ukraine once Iran and broader global issues dominate, and expects anti-corruption exposures tied to foreign aid to become politically useful for Trump’s domestic narrative and campaigning.

---

Presenters / Contributors

• Maxim Goldar — main speaker/host in the subtitles