[국어영역 임은아선생님] 2026년 1학년 9월 국어 해설강의

Main ideas & lessons conveyed

1) Exam overview + goals for students

• The lecturer (a Korean language teacher) introduces a review of the top 15 CSAT/academic-test questions with the highest error rates.
• Students are urged to:
  • Check the questions they got wrong accurately.
  • Use the lecture to understand the grammar/literature/reading reasoning rather than guessing.

---

2) Speech & Writing (국어: 말하기/문법·표기 관련) — Error rate “Language” topics

A. Abbreviations (약어) usage and the problem of misuse

• The curriculum shift groups “speech and language” content; the lecture emphasizes grammar-focused exam items.
• Main concepts:
  • Abbreviations often arise by taking the first syllables to form a shortened form (neologisms).
  • Abbreviation usage can vary by:
    • Age, occupation, internet-use frequency
    • Regional/educational background
    • Community language norms
• Risks:
  • Indiscriminate abbreviation use can make communication difficult for people unfamiliar with it.
  • Using abbreviations in formal situations is considered inappropriate.

Practical takeaway

• Refrain from indiscriminate abbreviation use.
• Use abbreviations only when the target audience and situation match.

---

B. Spacing rules (띄어쓰기) — meaning changes with spacing

• Key idea: spacing can change the interpretation (number, case function, ambiguity).
• The lecturer tests five underlined spacing errors and explains the logic using parts of speech:
  • Particles/dependent morphemes attach to the preceding word.
  • Independent words stand alone.

Representative spacing logic taught

• Dependent morphemes: attached to the previous word (e.g., particles, auxiliary/grammatical elements).
• Ambiguity: removing spaces can create wrong meaning.
• Improper spacing can slow/hinder efficient communication or risk misunderstanding.

How the lecturer solves spacing questions (method)

• Identify each word’s part of speech:
  • pronoun/adverb/verb/noun vs.
  • particle/auxiliary particle/dependent noun
• Decide whether it is dependent (attach) or independent (separate).
• Choose the option where spacing matches grammar rules and intended meaning.

---

C. Honorifics (존대) — direct vs indirect honorifics

• The lecture explains:
  • Honorific grammar elements express respect toward the object being raised.
  • Distinguish:
    • Direct honorifics (elevate the person directly)
    • Indirect honorifics (elevate closely related possessions/body)
• Two ways direct honorifics can appear (illustrated through nominative particle and honoring marker usage).
• Examples are analyzed by sentence structure:
  • Identify which referent is elevated
  • Determine whether the honorific applies directly to the subject or indirectly through related body/possession nouns.
• Errors are identified in options by whether the honorific type matches the target being raised.

Practical takeaway

• First decide: Who is being elevated?
• Then match whether the honorific is direct or indirect based on the semantics (person vs body/possession).

---

D. Middle Korean grammar & sound/letter behavior

• The lecturer addresses high-error CSAT items about Middle Korean orthography/phonology:
  • Final consonants and their Modern Korean equivalents (e.g., “Hieut/cheyeon” type discussion).
  • Vowel harmony in Middle Korean and how it affects combined forms.
  • Rules of continuous writing (linking) and sound transfer between syllables.
  • Nominative case particle forms:
    • There are three forms depending on phonological context (consonant/vowel environment), and also special cases with dependent nouns.
• The lecture repeatedly emphasizes:
  • Determine the phonological environment before choosing the correct form.
  • Explain why tempting incorrect options fail (e.g., wrong vowel harmony behavior).

---

3) Reading (사회/법·지식재산/철학·윤리) — Error rate “integrated passage” reasoning

A. Topic 1: Monopoly regulation vs antitrust and patent rights

1) Ice cream market analogy

• If there is only one seller, it becomes a market monopoly.
• Monopoly leads to higher prices because it can set prices freely.
• When multiple firms compete:
  • prices fall via price/technology competition,
  • variety increases,
  • consumer welfare/happiness increases.

2) Antitrust / fair competition goal

• Antitrust laws aim to prevent monopoly/oligopoly harm.
• “Competition restricting effect” is explained:
  • excessive restriction eliminates competitors → reduces competition.

3) M&A (corporate combinations) under Fair Trade Act

• Corporate combinations can create efficiencies but may also:
  • restrict competition,
  • elevate market concentration (e.g., becoming top by combined market share).
• Therefore, companies must report in advance and the regulator reviews effects.

4) Patent / intellectual property system under competition law

• Patents grant exclusive use and can appear to conflict with antitrust goals.
• The lecture argues they are not truly conflicting because:
  • the patent system incentivizes innovation (reward mechanism),
  • antitrust addresses harm when patent rights are abused to restrict competition.

5) When patent exercise becomes a Fair Trade Act issue

• Examples include:
  • unfair differential licensing fees,
  • imposing unreasonable conditions on implementation rights (e.g., bundling/conditions not directly needed),
  • restricting scope discriminatorily in ways that exceed legitimate rights.
• The key test repeated:
  • Does exercising rights produce an anti-competitive restriction effect beyond the “efficiency-enhancing” justification?
  • Is the conduct unfair per regulator criteria?

Applied answering method used

• Match each option to:
  • legitimacy of patent rights vs
  • “exceeding scope” / “unfair conditions” vs
  • presence of competition restriction effect.

---

B. Topic 2: Philosophy reading on Kant and Hegel (freedom)

• The lecturer compares:
  • Kant:
    • Freedom is not in the phenomenal causal realm (where events are determined).
    • Freedom relates to moral law grounded in reason.
    • Universality of maxims → moral law → conscious freedom.
  • Hegel:
    • Freedom exists through social institutions.
    • Critiques “abstract freedom” as individual choice without considering institutional constraints.
    • True freedom is “concrete,” achieved through harmony between individual freedom and community order.

Answering method

• For multiple-choice, do not use elimination.
• Use passage context to determine whether the option matches:
  • Kant’s internal moral law vs
  • Hegel’s institutional/social freedom framework.

---

C. Topic 3: Public interest whistleblowing case (law vs ethics)

• Scenario: a patent-holder/employee leaks/attempts to expose trade-tech information.
• Kant/Hegel frameworks are applied:
  • Kant: actions are judged by moral law universality; illegal procedure for exposure is problematic.
  • Hegel: focuses on legal procedure as an external restraint that stabilizes social harmony; ignoring procedure may cause social destruction.
• The correct option logic (as explained):
  • Under the Public Interest Whistleblowing Protection Act,
  • legally-protected reporting aligns with concrete freedom and solution-oriented action.

---

D. Topic 4: Argumentative writing & public deliberation

• The lecture explains how to read argumentative passages:

  • Identify claim (주장), grounds (근거/이유), counterargument (반론), refutation (재반박) structure.

• Specific concept:

  • Public deliberation (공론/공적 숙의) forms public opinion aligned with public interest.

• How it helps democracy:

  • enables equal consideration of stakeholder views,
  • exchanges information and verifies facts,
  • reaches consensus refined toward public interest.

• Another passage:

  • “Policy revival” and how to prevent it:
    • analyze causes of failure (e.g., target suspicions about objectives/means),
    • use persuasive expert information to establish means→effect authorization relations,
    • clarify content in a target-friendly way.

---

E. Topic 5: Literature—classical works interpretation (multiple poems/essays/novels)

• The lecturer repeatedly emphasizes:
  • In classical literature CSAT questions, start from the title, then interpret based on textual cues.
  • Identify rhetorical features: personification, paradoxical expression, repetition/syntactic parallelism, dialogue structure, and historical references.
• Examples covered include:
  • A poem about poverty with a “ghost/personification” of poverty, using dialogue to show emotional transformation and self-soothing.
  • A classical essay about seclusion and preserving oneself, with internal debate about “hiding” as a flawed method vs self-discipline/standards.
  • A modern-era novel setting (1970s urban industrialization, marginal class, corruption through in-kind ration manipulation).
• For multiple-choice:
  • Avoid overinterpretation; choose answers supported by the passage and rhetorical description.

---

4) Final administrative guidance

• The lecturer ends by advising students to:
  • use this lecture’s methods to handle school midterms,
  • reference supporting materials (PDF/course),
  • solve incorrect items independently first,
  • use answer keys only as last resort,
  • manage time in mock exams and maintain focus until the end.

---

Speaker / sources featured (as stated or clearly identifiable)

• Lee Moon-ha (임은아선생님) / “This is Lee Moon-ha, Listening Korean.” (primary lecturer)
• Unnamed students/examinees (audience; not distinct speakers)
• Kant (philosopher discussed)
• Hegel (philosopher discussed)
• The CSAT / school exams (institutional source of question content)
• Specific Korean classical authors/figures mentioned
  • Park Ji-won (박지원)
  • Jeong Yak-yong (정약용) (mentioned via context)
  • Confucius (공자) and disciples including Yan Hui/안회
  • Zengzi (증자)
  • Jang Jung-geo (장중거)
  • Jang Seok-jo / Ko Young-man / others (characters in the modern novel passage discussed)
• Legal frameworks / institutions discussed
  • Fair Trade Act / Fair Trade Commission (공정거래 관련)
  • Monopoly Regulation and Fair Trade (독점규제 및 공정거래 관련)
  • Public Interest Whistleblowing Protection Act (공익신고자보호법)