Video summary

【melt最強ダメージケア】最新作『ディープ』タイプが登場！従来作「モイスト」「スムース」との比較＆お勧めシャンプー＆トリートメントまとめ【話題の炭酸パウダーも！】

Main summary

Key takeaways

Product Review

Product reviewed

Melt (Rapid Beauty Hair Care series) — Deep Shampoo & Deep Treatment (plus a related renewed accessory: Creamy Melt Powder)

Key features (Deep Shampoo)

  • Positioned as “damage reduction” within the Melt lineup; concept is between the “Moist” and “Smooth” cleansing styles.
  • Cleansing system blends:
    • Main cleansing ingredient: coil methyl taolin sodium (taolin-based)
    • Includes lauryl glucoside as a major second cleanser (instead of being the top cleanser like in Smooth) to avoid excessive stripping
    • Also includes build-up removal helpers aimed at clearing silicone/film and “hair buildup”, helping prevent hair from feeling heavy
  • Lactic acid is present in a very high concentration (claimed ~7x conventional), supporting repair/shine-related effects.
  • Repair + smoothness focus:
    • Multiple repair proteins/conditioning agents (e.g., hydrolyzed keratin/silk/collagen, etc.)
    • Polyquaternium-52 is highlighted for creating a smooth feel, with the claim that it’s doubled vs conventional
    • Additional repair/frizz-control ingredients and heat-activated repair components are mentioned
  • User feel goals:
    • Rich, bouncy lather
    • Mild on hands (no sting even during glove-less preliminary handling)
    • No lingering slimy residue after rinsing
    • Scent: water lily and wood, described as more subdued than previous Melt versions

Key features (Deep Treatment)

  • Presented as the most powerful/“best in series” option for softening + damage repair.
  • Texture/usage:
    • Small amount goes a long way
    • More effective if left on slightly longer than usual
  • High concentration claims:
    • Contains a high concentration acid ingredient (said to be ~3x the Moist treatment amount)
    • “Deep Repair Ingredient T” described as the largest amount in the Melt treatment line (many repair-related components listed)
    • Includes newer/supporting softening & heat-related flexibility components (e.g., gamadocosalactone, “heat-lipia” components mentioned)
    • Contains ceramide NG, said to be unique vs other Melt treatments/shampoos
    • More plant/mineral-type components compared to other Melt treatments, aiming for a softer feel
  • Result feel (during application):
    • Immediate penetration and increased smoothness/silkiness
    • Rinses off smooth and creamy, with slip that doesn’t linger too long

Comparisons made (within Melt)

  • Moist
    • More moisturizing, balanced feel; generally positioned as milder for sensitive users
  • Smooth
    • More refreshing and higher cleansing power
    • Specialized for taming frizz, though the reviewer previously had some concern about cleanser strength
  • Deep (this product)
    • Cleansing designed to sit between Moist and Smooth
    • Best choice for damage care, especially for people who have had perm/straightening or high-damage treatments

Pricing (numerical)

  • Melt Deep Shampoo: 480 mL / 1,760 yen (tax included)
  • Deep Treatment: 220 g / 1,760 yen (tax included)
  • Creamy Melt Powder: 10 × 1 g packets / 1,980 yen (tax included)

Related add-on product mentioned: “Creamy Melt Powder” (renewed carbonated powder)

  • The reviewer explains Melt’s original carbonated powder was mostly fun fizz but lacked meaningful benefits.
  • Renewed version (Creamy Melt Powder):
    • Main components: sodium bicarbonate + citric acid
    • Produces a thick, fluffy foam when mixed with water (neutralization reaction releasing CO₂)
    • Adds sodium thiosulfate to boost refreshing cleansing and, when used with shampoo, aims to enhance cleansing efficiency
    • Packaging redesigned:
      • Previous paper container got soaked in the bathroom
      • New container uses plastic + drainage holes, can be left in the bathroom
  • Experiment comparison described:
    • Deep shampoo + Creamy melt powder: claims better removal of coating/build-up and leads to a smoother, glossier finish
    • Treatment + shampoo-only: more “natural” look but lighter feel; powder side looks more polished

Pros (as stated)

  • Strong repair focus with very high concentration repair ingredients
  • Cleansing power balanced (less harsh than Smooth; stronger/cleaner than a purely moisturizing approach)
  • Excellent lather and pleasant user feel
  • Rinses clean without lingering slimy feeling
  • Deep Treatment delivers very high softening and silky results quickly
  • New carbonated powder adds more than “just fizz,” and packaging is more convenient

Cons / cautions (as mentioned)

  • The video doesn’t frame major “cons,” but it implies:
    • If you prefer even milder cleansing, choose Moist instead of Deep/Smooth
    • Indirectly: those who want only a very gentle experience may not want Deep’s stronger repair/cleaning balance

Overall user experience described

  • Shampoo
    • Transparent with pearly shimmer
    • Rich bouncy foam
    • Mild on skin
    • Smooth rinse
  • Treatment
    • Small amount is enough
    • Penetrates quickly
    • Rinses creamy and smooth
    • Results described as soft, silky, and easier to manage
  • With the powder add-on
    • Hair feels smoother/polished
    • Carbonation foam is “fun” during use

Overall verdict / recommendation

Recommended as the top Melt option for people prioritizing hair damage repair. If you want the strongest cleansing/refresh feeling, go Smooth; if you want maximum mildness, go Moist. But for damage preservation, the video concludes Deep is the best fit.

Unique points by speaker (only one main speaker in subtitles)

  • Kanosuke
    • Conducts all product analysis, ingredient breakdowns, experiment impressions, comparisons (Moist vs Smooth), and delivers price + recommendation conclusions
  • Mentions “Ringo-san”
    • Specifically in relation to an “amber-like” component and supporting notes, but no separate evaluation is provided beyond that mention

Original video