The Grand Strategy Behind Everything Trump Is Doing | Michael Every

Michael Every’s Core Thesis: an Ideological Superstructure Is Collapsing “Everywhere All At Once”

Michael Every argues that a long-running global “ideological and intellectual superstructure”—built over roughly the last 45 years—is now collapsing simultaneously across:

• Economics
• Geopolitics
• Technology

This collapse forces a fundamentally new worldview. He frames today’s environment as a “gun on the table” moment, where outcomes depend on parallel, mutually reinforcing moves, rather than gradual, linear change.

The situation is not incremental—it’s strategic, multi-domain, and synchronized.

---

Everything Is “Rewired” at Once

Every compares the current environment to the end-of-era strategic challenges faced by the Soviet Union, implying that responses must occur “everywhere all at once.”

He also stresses that policy domains cannot be separated cleanly:

• Financial/economic policy is intertwined with hard commodities (notably diesel and refined products)
• It is further linked to military conflict and industrial capacity

---

Drivers of the “Tectonic Shifts”

1) AI Acceleration

Every references claims associated with OpenAI (relative to Anthropic) and the launching of an AGI system, described as potentially creating a “Manhattan Project moment”—an artificial system smarter than humans that could teach itself.

• He treats this as high-implication
• But notes the uncertainty over whether it’s hype

2) U.S. Global Strategy and Conflict Timing

Every suggests that Trump may announce pauses in the Iran war and references the possibility of South Korea sending forces to Hormuz. However, he argues the underlying pattern is more likely renewed escalation after political milestones such as midterms.

• He dismisses “peace” messaging as tactical, not structural

3) Energy Constraints as the Physical Bottleneck

A repeated theme is that shortages in:

• Diesel
• refined fuels

make inflation and logistics problems persist unless:

• refineries expand, or
• wars end decisively

He argues:

• Crude is abundant relative to refining capacity
• Refining expansion takes years
• Therefore, inflation may be structural, not merely cyclical

4) Industrial and Policy Disruptions in Europe and Elsewhere

Every points to European policy ideas—possibly including:

• weakening the euro
• capital controls
• tariffs
• arrangements resembling a “China Plaza”-type approach

He interprets these as market-shocking “outside the box” proposals, driven by desperation and strategic realignment rather than stable long-term assumptions.

---

Venezuela / “Dunro Doctrine”: Linkage Between Economic and Military Statecraft

Every argues that the Venezuela oil deal (and the broader strategy behind it) shows how economic and military statecraft can occur together—securing:

• energy
• influence
• as part of a “grand macro strategy”

For Iran, he argues it was always a target, accelerated by:

• battlefield dynamics
• the risk of Iran moving toward nuclear capability

(He frames this as controversial but motivating.)

---

A Block-Based World Order, Not a Simple West-vs-Rest Model

Every suggests countries increasingly act in blocs, rather than independently. He also argues that Trump’s actions are often misread as bilateral quarrels; instead, they reflect building an invited political “dinner party” inside a broader economic system that remains integrated.

---

Economic and Monetary Policy: High Risk, Potentially Manageable

Asked to assess the U.S. administration’s handling of monetary and financial policy, Every avoids a simple rating and offers a probabilistic framing:

• 2/3 chance of managing the transition successfully
• 1/3 chance of dramatic failure

He argues the challenge is not only interest rates, but coordinating:

• kinetics (war and coercion)
• with financing (e.g., yield-curve management)
• while maintaining productive investment rather than speculative flows

---

How the Fed/Financial System Would Have to Adapt

Every proposes a model where:

• long-term yields cannot spiral upward, because that would break financing for:
  • government
  • defense
• the U.S. leans toward short-end liquidity management
  • using Treasuries/T-bills as “insurance”
  • implying focus on the front end rather than the long end
• the Fed must encourage productive investment
  • not just financial market trading
  • so policy supports factories and the real economy

---

Stablecoins as a Potential “Rewiring” Mechanism

Every suggests stablecoins could be used to:

• reallocate dollar interest rates globally
• generate funding for U.S. needs
• strengthen dollar demand abroad

He claims statecraft could accelerate adoption by tying payments—especially for oil—to stablecoins, creating a “pro-quo” (a counterpart benefit) for U.S. strategic leverage.

He also acknowledges risk:

• success requires rapid scale
• and political backing
• not just market forces

---

Reindustrialization Timeline and Constraints

Every describes reindustrialization as:

• a multi-decade project
• at minimum ~10 years
• potentially requiring additional time beyond the first steps and possibly two more terms

He notes:

• vested interests and ideological resistance will fight the transition
• the limiting factor is largely physical capacity, including:
  • refineries
  • metals
  • electricity
  • industrial buildout
• capital availability is not the only constraint

---

China’s Leverage and Achilles’ Heels

Every argues China has major physical and industrial strength (energy and manufacturing), but also key internal vulnerabilities:

• worsening fiscal outlook (behind a “firewall”)
• weak home demand absorption due to:
  • automation
  • gig-work displacement
• reported profitability issues (he claims about one-third of Chinese companies lose money)

He argues the U.S. cannot rely solely on financial dominance, because financial tools may be constrained by geopolitical “ring-fencing.”

---

Forecast: Escalation Risk Dominates the Rest of the Year

Every expects escalation—especially after midterms—with particular involvement including:

• Iran
  • including potential strikes on desalination plants or oil assets
• Russia/Ukraine
  • including broader gray-zone actions
  • and even pressure near NATO borders

He highlights tail risk: multiple fronts escalating together could create a noisy end-of-year period.

Politically, he claims:

• Congress may be less able to restrain executive action
• therefore the administration may rely more on executive orders

---

Europe Outlook

Every portrays Europe as:

• structurally weaker
• less coordinated to handle shocks
• lacking the leverage to pressure China effectively

He flags an upcoming test:

• Europe’s October deadline to China to adjust trade policy

He warns:

• if Europe chooses tariffs/trade war
• it could trigger a cascading “avalanche”

---

Presenters / Contributors

• Michael Every (guest; strategist/analyst)
• Host / Interviewer: Unspecified in subtitles (referred to only indirectly, e.g., “Michael Every, welcome to the show”)