This Sale Won't Last – 5 Stocks Worth Buying

Market thesis: “receipt vs. guess” (why weakness can be an opportunity)

The speaker argues that recent market weakness has created buying opportunities in companies “priced as if future/contracted cash receipts don’t exist.” The key idea is that some firms have large signed contract/backlog revenue that de-risks demand, yet the stock price is still behaving as though those receipts are uncertain or nonexistent.

They claim this disconnect between receipts/backlog and stock price can persist only briefly—i.e., “market on sale won’t stay open.”

---

Core framework: how the market values stocks

Most stocks trade on a “guess”

• Wall Street forecasts next-year sales and prices the stock on that expectation.
• When sentiment turns, stocks can fall even if fundamentals are intact.

Some stocks trade on a “receipt”

• These companies already have multi-year customer contracts/backlog that are signed.
• Because contracted revenue/backlog is booked before cash is collected, the market can temporarily re-price downward despite legally committed future payments.

Practical action approach (as described)

• Prefer buying high-quality businesses on weakness
• Use small staged entries (explicitly mentioned for several names)
• Perform risk checks around:
  • customer concentration
  • leverage
  • timing of cash flows (near-term vs. later)

---

Stocks and companies mentioned

1) Oracle (ORCL)

Thesis

Big contracted “receipt” is being ignored; the stock fell because the market over-interpreted the largest contract risk, then later discounted it.

Key numbers

• $638B in signed contracted revenue
• Stock is ~57% below its high
• Contracted books:
  • ~$138B a year ago
  • ~$638B now (>4x in one year)
• Speaker comparison framing: $638B ~ Nvidia’s market cap in 2021
• Contract concentration:
  • $300B supply agreement to supply computing power to OpenAI over 5 years (~$60B/year)
  • Speaker frames this as close to doubling Oracle’s scale (relative-context)
• Cash flow impact:
  • Construction spending: $6B/quarter (two years ago) → $16B/quarter now
  • ≈ $55B/year construction spending
  • Free cash flow flipped to about -$24B (“24B in the red”)
  • Described as ~$60B swing from two years prior
• Deal valuation shock:
  • Speaker notes the market added nearly $250B to Oracle’s value in a single day
• Drawdown rationale (speaker’s framing):
  • Market realized ~half the book leans on OpenAI
  • OpenAI losses + not yet public (counterparty/risk framing)
  • Borrowing to fund builds; cash flow negative

Recommendation / portfolio behavior

• “For my money, Oracle… I’m accumulating it slowly on weakness in small pieces” (staged buying)

Cautions / risks

• OpenAI is a major counterparty concentration concern (“only as good as that customer”)
• The stock fall is described as partly justified by leverage and cash flow timing vs. contract delivery

---

2) InnoData (ENO) — AI data labeling “shovel seller”

(Ticker shown as ENO. “Inodata/Eno data” appears in subtitles.)

Thesis

Neutral data engineering/data labeling provider benefits from the AI “gold rush,” with improving customer concentration—but priced richly and described as volatile.

Key numbers

• Company value: ~$2B
• Growth:
  • 58% revenue growth last quarter
  • 12th straight quarter of growth
  • Guidance: at least 40% full-year
• Customer concentration:
  • A year ago: one giant customer >50% of revenue
  • Now: that customer ~down to one-third
  • Other customers grew; second big tech customer to nearly one-third
• Valuation/trading:
  • Trades around 46x earnings
• Short interest:
  • ~14%, “climbing very fast”
• Insider selling:
  • Execs selling near highs; founder CEO cashing out ~$24M

Recommendation / portfolio sizing

• “ENO is the highest risk name on my entire list”
• Held as a very small position so a bad month won’t hurt much (expected volatility)

Cautions

• Still a small fast-moving AI name (“choppiest corner”)
• Stock can swing violently
• Insider selling into strength is a yellow flag
• Short sellers betting growth slows (fundamentals not necessarily broken)

---

3) Mayfair Gold Corporation (“Mayfair Gold”)

(No ticker provided in the subtitles. Exchange availability is implied.)

Key numbers

• Prefeasibility study for Finn Gibb project in the Trimman’s gold district:
  • After-tax value ~C$652M
  • 24% return
  • First production targeted for 2030
• Ownership/insiders:
  • Insiders ~35%
  • Institutions ~28%
  • HNW investors ~20%
  • Retail <20%
  • Insiders put ~$20M into stock in 2 years
  • CEO added ~400,000 shares
  • Carson Block’s Muddy Waters holds >17%
• Speaker note (disclosure-like framing):
  • Mayfair described as only pre-production gold stock held by Oaktree

“Buy” framing

• Presented as concentrated ownership + heavy insider buying + near-time producer

Cautions

• “Do your own due diligence.” (No further risk metrics provided)

Tickers / exchange mentions

• New York Stock Exchange mentioned (availability “on most every exchange” per subtitles)
• Specific ticker not provided

---

4) Sterling Infrastructure (STRL)

Thesis

A data-center groundworks builder with a large backlog (“receipt”) is punished for margin compression driven by an acquisition mix effect.

Key numbers

• Backlog:
  • >$5.5B
  • Grew by half again in one year (≈ 1.5x-ish)
• Revenue:
  • “nearly doubled last quarter”
• Balance sheet/profitability:
  • No net debt
  • Return on equity ~40%
• Acquisition/margin issue:
  • Acquired an electrical contractor (wiring/groundwork together)
  • Electrical work has thinner margin
  • Consolidated operating margin slipped ~4 points
• Valuation/outlook:
  • Trades about 46% below its high
  • Still around nearly 40x earnings
  • Growth expected to cool:
    • from ~60% this year
    • toward low 20s next year

Recommendation

• Speaker holds with more conviction than most on the list, despite not being “statistically cheap”

Cautions

• Margin dip from acquisition created sell-off
• Growth normalization is a real factor
• Emphasizes: backlog (“receipt”) grew by half even as margins ticked down

---

5) MasTec (MASTEC)

Thesis

Power/grid buildout backlog is huge and contracted, but the stock fell mainly due to a different segment (cell towers/telecom) temporarily slowing.

Key numbers

• Backlog / contracts:
  • >$21B backlog (all-time record)
  • Backlog grew 30% in a single year
• Timing/contract certainty framing:
  • “record backlog is scheduled for next year”
• Guidance:
  • Latest quarter: beat and raised
• Power demand macro:
  • U.S. power demand “roughly triples by the end of the decade”
• Stock drawdown:
  • Down nearly 40% from its high
• Debt risk:
  • Speaker contrasts with STRL: this one “carries real debt”
• Segment catalyst:
  • Cell towers/telecom segment had an “air pocket”
  • “couple of really big carriers” slowed spending

Recommendation

• “On MasTec, I’m waiting… start small and add it on weaknesses”

Cautions

• Cash timing and debt: “best cash… doesn’t even land until the back half of this year”
• Headline risk from telecom slowdown even if power business is booming

---

6) AppLovin (APP / AppLovin)

Thesis

High operating-margin ad-tech software fell >50% due to SEC/investigation fears plus a guidance miss. Speaker argues regulatory risk is effectively resolved, and the market overreacted to the softer guidance.

Key numbers

• Drawdown:
  • Down more than 50% from its high
  • After drop: paying about ~21x next year’s earnings
• Profitability:
  • ~80 cents of operating profit per $1 revenue (operating margin ~80% per speaker)
  • Speaker compares to Visa’s “mid-60s” operating margin
• Growth:
  • Revenue “almost 53% last quarter”
  • Guided next quarter to something like ~47% growth (slower than street wanted)
• Regulatory overhang:
  • For more than a year, under cloud from short seller reports about “shady data practices”
  • SEC investigation opened
  • On earnings day: disclosed SEC closed investigation with no action/no wrongdoing found
  • Stock still dropped around 20% that day due to growth slightly below plan
• Valuation context:
  • Speaker notes a multiple not carried back when the stock was the market’s darling

Recommendation

• Speaker says it’s already owned “a lot of it” and will continue to buy more after it “hit the floor,” expecting technicals to catch up

Cautions / risks

• Growth cooling off vs “perfection expectations”
• “Volatile stage”: stock can stay cheap longer due to technical/momentum effects
• Open question marks around an e-commerce ads business opened to everyone “this summer” (scaling uncertainty)

---

Instruments/assets/sectors/macros explicitly referenced

• Sectors/industries
  • Oracle: database/enterprise software
  • ENO: AI data labeling
  • Mayfair Gold: gold mining
  • STRL: data-center construction/infrastructure
  • MasTec: power grid/transmission
  • AppLovin: ad-tech / AI software
• AI/data center buildout macro
  • AI drives data-center demand
  • U.S. power demand projected to roughly triple by end of decade
• OpenAI
  • Counterparty/customer risk for Oracle; also buyer of computing power
• Telecom carriers
  • Generic slowing contributed to MasTec’s telecom/cell-tower segment weakness
• Comparables
  • Nvidia used for scale comparison
  • Visa used for operating-margin comparison
• Other named entities
  • Meta/Scale AI deal mentioned (as part of context)

---

Disclosures / disclaimers

“I’m not a financial adviser and I do this for educational purposes.”

---

Presenter / sources mentioned

• Presenter/host: Brian
  • Retired after a corporate career with Target and Amazon
• Investors/sources mentioned:
  • Howard Marx (investor; associated with Oaktree Capital reading)
  • Oaktree Capital (owns ~4.5 million shares of Mayfair per subtitles)
  • Carson Block / Muddy Waters (holds north of 17% of Mayfair)
  • SEC (AppLovin investigation; later closed with no action)
  • Meta (deal with Scale AI referenced)
  • Muddy Waters / short sellers referenced regarding AppLovin allegations