Iran War Reignites ‘Geopolitical Commodity Warfare’; Gold, Oil, Treasuries At Risk | Nomi Prins

Summary of Main Arguments and Analysis (Nomi Prins on Markets, Commodities, and Central Banking)

Central banks shifting reserves away from US Treasuries toward gold

Nomi Prins argues that central banks are downplaying how much they are buying US Treasuries, even though Treasuries were historically the dominant reserve asset. She claims that gold has surpassed Treasuries as the main reserve asset on central bank balance sheets, and that gold’s share continues to rise.

Bond market signaling: higher yields from weaker demand and more issuance

With the US 30-year yield nearing ~5%, Prins says bond markets are signaling two related dynamics:

1. Inflation dynamics remain in the background—yields had room to rise when inflation rose.
2. More Treasury issuance (including spending tied to conflict and the cost of servicing interest) is arriving at a time when central bank demand is weaker, contributing to lower prices and higher yields.

Oil and the Strait of Hormuz disruption: normalization, but volatility remains

Prins frames earlier commodity price spikes as driven by fear that about 20% of oil transit through the Strait of Hormuz would be disrupted. Strategic reserve releases eased panic, but she argues the market has since adjusted rather than solved the risk:

• Oil prices moved from around $100 toward the $70–$80 range.
• Other Middle East producers can return to output and refining, though toll/fee and rerouting costs may become a “new normal.”
• Volatility will persist due to ongoing uncertainty around supply flows and replenishment of strategic reserves.

“Artificial suppression of oil prices” is misframed

Prins rejects the idea that recent oil price suppression is mainly “artificial.” Instead, she says the observed price range reflects real logistics and substitution mechanisms, including:

• Supplies from other regions (e.g., the Americas)
• Middle East production and refining adjustments
• Time-delayed replenishment of strategic stocks

Consumer sentiment improves as oil’s inflation effect “passes through” less

Prins links a modest improvement in University of Michigan consumer sentiment to lower oil prices easing the “pinch at the pump.” She notes the Fed emphasizes “core” inflation measures that exclude energy, but argues that energy still matters for the broader inflation picture when oil prices fall—showing up in CPI/PPI.

Fed policy critique: don’t raise rates for optics; inflation is supply-driven

Prins argues the Fed’s stance should be essentially “wait” and avoid rate hikes motivated by headline inflation. Her key points include:

• Small hikes (e.g., 25–50 bps) won’t materially change inflation.
• Supply chain rerouting and commodity/energy shifts drive inflation more than monetary tweaks.
• She suggests the Fed may be “boxed in” by labor-market conditions and implies market “hawkishness” could be an overreaction to limited Fed signaling.

QE/QT: “QE in the background” via balance-sheet dynamics

She suggests that the Fed has continued a form of easing by letting the balance sheet remain higher—describing it as liquidity support in the backdrop, even if it is not labeled QE.

Global investment behavior: less long-term appetite for Treasuries

Prins argues non-US actors are increasingly using supply chains as geopolitical tools (rare earths, uranium, tungsten, etc.) rather than relying on US Treasuries as the main “safe” lever. She expects a divergence:

• Continued interest in US equities, often with currency hedging
• Structurally weaker demand for Treasuries going forward

Gold buying persists; some central banks reduce Treasuries but still hold some

Prins cites several examples:

• China’s Treasury holdings fall materially (down to hundreds of billions), while gold allocation remains small in percentage terms but continues to rise.
• Turkey as an example of monetizing prior gold purchases at higher prices (selling gold accumulated earlier).
• A broader forecast that some central banks may eventually hold only a small “float” of Treasuries, allocating more to gold and other currencies.

Toward an “implicit” gold-collateral system (not necessarily a classic gold standard)

Even without instant convertibility, rising gold holdings could produce an “implicit” gold-backed environment that supports credit, settlement, and trade arrangements—effectively resembling a gold-relative collateral regime.

Supply-chain “resilience” and export controls raise costs anyway

Prins argues that countries will accept higher costs for resilience, but consumers will still pay—either through:

• Domestic restructuring costs, or
• External restrictions (export controls) that raise prices along the supply chain

Investment opportunities created by distortions (commodity-focused)

Silver market distortions

Prins claims silver has been hit more than gold due to paper-trading/ETF mechanics. She references a Sprott-style silver ETF contract that reportedly traded far above its average during periods, with headline-driven moves causing sharp drops—creating opportunities for investors willing to be selective.

Copper

She highlights copper as structurally important and claims China restricted certain inputs (e.g., sulfuric acid used in processing), suggesting upside in particular junior developers that are less dependent on those restricted inputs.

Rare earths and other strategic “hard” minerals

Prins recommends watching less-covered markets such as rare earths, tungsten, antimony, graphite, and gallium. She frames these as potential beneficiaries of reopening and realigning supply chains under “geopolitical commodity warfare.”

---

Presenters / Contributors

• David (host / interviewer)
• Nomi Prins (geoeconomist, author)