Самое интересное купе-кабриолет в бюджетном сегменте! - Renault Megane 2 CC #KEDRDR

Product reviewed

Renault Megane 2 Coupé-Cabriolet (2 CC / coupe-cabriolet) — “budget coupe‑cabriolet”

The discussion focuses mainly on the reviewers’ ownership experience and comparisons with other convertibles/engine/transmission setups.

Key features mentioned

• Retractable roof (coupe‑cabriolet) Electric roof + fabric/canvassing system. Mechanically described as “simple,” but it requires periodic lubrication of the rubber bands/roof mechanism (e.g., silicone grease).

• Panoramic roof option Mentioned as unusual/rare for this budget segment, and contributing to a more open cabin feel.

• Keyless entry / convenience features Early-2000s example discussed, including “convenience buttons” such as:

  • raising windows
  • disabling parking sensors

• Rear wind deflector (rare accessory) Improves comfort around 120–130 km/h when cruising with the roof open.

• Large trunk for a convertible Reviewers emphasize that the trunk remains fairly large even with the roof folded.

• Comfort & ergonomics

  • Seat heating is present.
  • Limited headroom: awkward for taller drivers (~185–190 cm and above).
  • Some interior storage is criticized (e.g., lack of rear cup holders / limited rear amenities).

Pros (as stated in the video)

• Very fun “summer” experience Convertible driving sensations are highlighted as the main reason to buy.

• Good openness and usability for the class

  • Roof-down cruising is enjoyable.
  • With the wind deflector, it’s less turbulent at speed.
  • Trunk size is described as “the biggest in its class” (as claimed), even versus other convertibles.

• Body corrosion resistance Claimed galvanization and low rust risk; a spare-wheel niche is described as non-rotting.

• Driving feel (roof up) Feels “collected” enough for a budget convertible. On uneven roads it’s less comfortable than sedans, but still acceptable.

• Engine choice praise (diesel)

  • The 2.0L diesel is described as particularly rare and “reliable for its time.”
  • Diesel is preferred for torque/driveability, with caveats about performance at low rpm.

• Owner satisfaction / value framing The reviewers present it as good value for pleasure compared to buying a similarly priced sedan/wagon.

Cons / problems mentioned (main ones)

1) Body rigidity / convertible nature

• Convertible rigidity is discussed as weaker than cars designed as convertibles from the start.
• Expect more twisting when driving without the roof.
• Some owners dislike the “softness” compared to sportier convertibles (indirectly compared to BMW Z4-style feel).

2) Common mechanical wear items

From ownership/inspection discussion:

• Rear suspension: coil springs and shocks Cracked spring(s) and need to replace rear components.

• Brakes and wheels/stance issues

  • Multiple comments about brake disc replacement.
  • Wheel/tire choices (e.g., 235 wide tires) contributed to a harder/rougher ride and increased bending risk on damaged roads.

• Lambda probe failure Noted as causing incorrect fueling/behavior.

• Frequent maintenance due to age “Age takes its toll,” even at decent mileage.

3) Specific high-risk transmission (biggest technical warning)

The video strongly criticizes DP0 automatic transmission:

• Described as fragile, prone to failure
• Issues include overheating and slow operation
• Clear recommendation: avoid DP0

While other models may pair diesel with better automatics, the reviewer emphasizes that the pairing matters for this specific car.

4) Cooling / engine bay maintenance complexity

• Convertible under-hood conditions and hard-to-service areas are mentioned.
• Cooling radiators and airflow blockage by debris are concerns.
• The reviewer used a stone protection mesh to help.

5) Convertible roof auxiliary components

• Roof leaks/rigging risks are discussed generally:
  • Correct geometry/safety is emphasized.
  • If the body was hit and repainted, safety systems may not be as designed.
• An emergency/manual procedure exists for roof operation, involving a bolt/locks, described as a useful safety feature.

6) Interior usability limits

• Tall drivers may struggle with headroom.
• Rear comfort/amenities are limited:
  • lack of some rear storage (e.g., rear cup holders)
  • rear ventilation is limited/none depending on configuration

Engine/transmission comparisons (important)

• Petrol vs Diesel

  • Petrol is described as less ideal for the reviewer’s use.
  • Discussion also mentions more vibration/noise linked to interactions between plastic/suspension components.
  • Diesel is praised as smoother and torquey when matched with the right gearing.

• Diesel 2.0L rarity The 2.0L diesel coupe‑cabriolet is called extremely rare in the market.

• Transmission recommendation

  • Manual / non‑DP0 versions are preferred.
  • DP0 automatic is repeatedly emphasized as the “no-go” choice.

User experience & ownership narrative (how it feels to live with)

• Roof operation

  • Windows roll down automatically first as part of the sequence.
  • Folding/unfolding is mostly automation-driven, but still requires correct handling (no items blocking the mechanism).

• Comfort at speed

  • Wind becomes significant with the roof open.
  • The deflector helps reduce turbulence.

• Maintenance burden

  • After purchase, multiple replacements are discussed (suspension, sensors, mechanical refresh).
  • Many issues are framed as age-related wear, not necessarily design defects.

Overall verdict / recommendation (based on the video)

Buy the Renault Megane 2 CC coupe‑cabriolet for driving pleasure/value—BUT only if you choose the right drivetrain and check the car very carefully.

The main “deal-breaker” is avoiding the DP0 automatic transmission. The reviewers also repeatedly warn that convertible body geometry and accident history can affect safety and roof operation.

Unique points mentioned (distinct items)

1. Roof mechanism needs periodic lubrication (silicone grease recommended).
2. Keyless entry + convenience buttons for windows/parking sensors.
3. Rare rear wind deflector improves comfort at speed with roof open.
4. Trunk remains large for a convertible.
5. Convertible rigidity/twisting is less than “true” convertibles designed from the start.
6. Possible risk from prior accidents/repainting: inspect body geometry and roof/safety readiness.
7. Common wear: rear springs/shocks, brake/discs, suspension bushings/silent blocks.
8. Lambda probe failure causes wrong fueling/drive behavior.
9. Tall-driver headroom limitation (~185–190 cm).
10. Limited rear amenities: storage/cup holders/ventilation constraints.
11. Roof emergency closing procedure exists (manual bolt/locks).
12. Roof-open cruising needs wind management (deflector or accept turbulence).
13. Engine bay serviceability is complicated; keep cooling clean from debris.
14. Strong warning against DP0 automatic (unreliable/overheats/breaks down).
15. Diesel praise: 2.0L diesel is rare and reliable when maintained; liked for torque/drive character.
16. Wheel/tire setup: wide tires affect ride harshness and can increase bending risk.
17. Diesel maintenance intervals emphasized (oil/filter schedules, service quality).
18. General reliability claim of galvanized body and low rust risk.

Speaker-specific views (grouped)

• Main owner/reviewer (technical + inspection + repair details)

  • Focuses on mechanical reliability, drivetrain choice (anti-DP0), roof mechanism care, and a long list of replacements.

• Co-reviewer(s) / friends (pricing + lifestyle + impressions)

  • Focuses on value comparisons, emotional/pleasure aspects, comfort impressions, and “summer car” fun.

• Comparison references in the discussion

  • Mentions other convertibles/coupe-cabriolets broadly (e.g., EOS/Focus/Cabrio variants) and general convertible engineering/rigidity concepts.

• Dealer/third-party referral comments

  • Mentions having the car checked via services/dealers for prior accident/condition verification.