Video summary

Meeting 2 Basic Concept of Translation

Main summary

Key takeaways

Educational

Main ideas & concepts covered (Meeting 2: Basic Concept of Translation)

1) Fundamental “terms in translation”

Translation (process)

  • Refers to an intangible, internal mental process that happens in the translator’s brain.
  • It cannot be directly observed from the outside.
  • In the video, this is contrasted with observable actions during translation.

Translating (activity/process you can see)

  • Refers to the tangible, observable activity of translating a text.
  • Examples mentioned:
    • looking up a dictionary
    • searching/glossing (e.g., Googling)
    • writing the translated output by hand or typing on a laptop

A translation (product)

  • Refers to the result/product of translation activities.
  • Examples of translation products:
    • subtitles for films
    • translated novels
    • translated songs
    • translated books

Translator / types of translator

  • A translator performs translation work.
  • The video also mentions there are different roles (e.g., interpreters, subtitlers).

Key labels in translation direction

  • SL (Source Language) / ST (Source Text)

    • The original language/text
    • Example: English → Indonesian
      • SL = English, ST = English text
  • TL (Target Language) / TT (Target Text)

    • The language/text you translate into
    • Example: English → Indonesian
      • TL = Indonesian, TT = Indonesian text
  • Reversal example: Indonesian → English

    • SL = Indonesian, TL = English (and corresponding ST/TT switch)

Target readers

  • Translation must consider who will read/use the translation.
  • Example idea:
    • If translating a children’s storytelling book, the language and word choices should match children’s reading experience and comprehension.
  • The example highlights that word choice may change depending on the audience (children vs. teenagers/adults).

Equivalence (matching meaning)

  • The translated output should be equivalent/commensurate:
    • what is said in the source text should match the meaning conveyed in the target text.

Translator competence

  • Translators need skills/competence.
  • Examples of competence types mentioned:
    • cultural competence
    • language competence
    • (and others later)

Untranslatability

  • Some terms/expressions may not be directly translatable.
  • Examples referenced (culture-specific items):
    • “Midodareni”
    • “Suronan”
  • The video notes that techniques for untranslatable terms will be discussed later.

Quality criteria for good translation

  • Accuracy (correctness)
  • Acceptability (natural/appropriate in the target language context)
  • Readability (how readable the text is)
  • Also mentioned: Comprehensibility (understanding from the human side)
  • These are framed as the main criteria for assessing translation quality.

2) Definitions of translation (scholars mentioned)

Larson’s definition

  • Translation = transferring the source language into the target language.
  • What is transferred is primarily the meaning of the text,
  • in a way intended by the author.

Another scholar’s definition (content and style)

  • Translation is an activity that transfers:
    • content and style
    • from the source text to the target text.
  • Emphasis example:
    • If the target text is academic (e.g., an abstract), the style must be academic, not casual.

Brislin’s definition

  • Translation = a general term for transferring:
    • thoughts and ideas
  • From one language to another language/text.
  • Can be:
    • written or spoken
    • even if languages have or do not have standard orthographies
    • even if one/both languages are based on science language / includes mention of sign language
  • Key recap idea:
    • Brislin’s “thoughts and ideas” aligns with Larson’s “meaning” (treated as conceptually the same).

Instructor recap: what must be conveyed

  • Most important transferable element: meaning
    • Both scholars point to conveying the content/ideas meaning.
  • Form may differ
    • Sentence structure may change,
    • but the grammatical meaning / intended meaning should remain.

3) Types of translation

A) Types according to Jakobson

  1. Intralingual translation (within the same language)

    • Interpretation of verbal signs using other signs within the same language.
    • Examples:
      • explaining a difficult topic using easier wording
      • simplifying/rewording a complex legal document or academic paper
      • rewriting classic/old texts into contemporary language
      • paraphrasing: expressing the same idea in different words
  2. Interlingual translation (“translation proper”)

    • Translation between different languages
    • Involves source text and target text.
  3. Intersemiotic translation (transmutation)

    • Transfer from a verbal source into a nonverbal form.
    • Examples mentioned:
      • short story adapted into dance
      • stories like Ramayana / Mahabharata adapted into films or other media

B) Types according to media

  • Written translation
    • translation of documents written in text form
  • Interpreting
    • spoken/oral translation
  • Audio-visual translation
    • examples:
      • translating songs (with screen/display context)
      • video games

4) “The translator” (who the translator is and requirements)

Becoming a translator

  • The video asks: if you translate a text, do you suddenly become a translator?
  • Answer: No—to be a translator requires requirements and competence.

Requirements/roles described

  1. Has translation competence

    • Translators must have the necessary skills, not only bilingual ability.
  2. Communication bridge

    • Translators/interpreters act as a bridge between parties who do not share the same language.
    • Example:
      • one person can’t speak English
      • the other can’t speak Indonesian
      • the translator mediates between them

Translation competence (Newbert’s framework; five sub-competencies)

  • 1) Language subcompetence

    • knowledge of grammar/linguistics in English and Indonesian
  • 2) Textual subcompetence

    • ability to handle different text types, e.g.:
      • agreement letters
      • academic texts
      • newspapers
      • various genres
  • 3) Cultural subcompetence

    • ability to mediate across cultural differences.
    • Examples:
      • “breakfast” differences between Australia/Sydney vs. Indonesia
      • handling cultural concepts like “salad” and how meaning may map differently in Indonesian contexts
  • 4) Subject subcompetence

    • familiarity with a specific domain/field of knowledge needed for the text.
    • Examples:
      • biological texts → know biology
      • law documents → know legal domain
      • math documents → be familiar with mathematics terminology
  • 5) Transfer subcompetence / strategic competence

    • ability to use strategies during translation.
    • Strategies will be taught later (strategic transfers and types).

5) Closing activity / lesson takeaway

  • Students are asked to create a mind map of the lesson.
  • They can upload it to Google Classroom (optional) or share via class methods.
  • The mind map is recommended to support easier practice in the next session.

Speakers / sources featured

  • Miss Lili Istiqomah (course instructor/narrator)
  • Larson (definition of translation)
  • Brislin (definition of translation)
  • Jakobson (types of translation)
  • Newbert (mentioned as “new bird” in subtitles) — five competencies for translation competence framework

Original video